Jump to content

User talk:Albertaont: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
DPL bot (talk | contribs)
dablink notification message (see the FAQ)
→‎Notification: new section
Line 21: Line 21:


It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 09:29, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 09:29, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

== Notification ==

[[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement]]. [[User:FDW777|FDW777]] ([[User talk:FDW777|talk]]) 16:49, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:49, 14 September 2020

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Albertaont, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! - Ahunt (talk) 14:59, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sinovac Ph II results

On my talk page, you said: could you provide an fuller rationale as to why you deleted my edit re "not independent journal report; the company controlled what it released to Reuters; needs to be a journal publication". Is it because the news was reported in Reuters (a non-scientific journal), or is it because you didn't believe the company actually released the pre-print Phase II results? Either way, i have attached the pre-print from medRxiv. Is this what you were looking for?

Note that the medRxiv source the study has not yet been peer-reviewed. Neither Reuters nor this source would qualify as "final" results for the Phase II trial. Let's wait for the full peer-reviewed publication. Thanks. Zefr (talk) 00:03, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Killing of Daniel Prude, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dansville. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. FDW777 (talk) 16:49, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]