User talk:Bytemeh: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Only warning: Vandalism on Flip's Twisted World. (TW) |
leaving note |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== November 2010 == |
== November 2010 == |
||
[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px]] This is your '''only warning'''. If you [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalize]] Wikipedia again, as you did at [[:Flip's Twisted World]], you may be '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]] without further notice'''. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism4im --> [[User:VQuakr|VQuakr]] ([[User talk:VQuakr|talk]]) 06:31, 9 November 2010 (UTC) |
[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px]] This is your '''only warning'''. If you [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalize]] Wikipedia again, as you did at [[:Flip's Twisted World]], you may be '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]] without further notice'''. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism4im --> [[User:VQuakr|VQuakr]] ([[User talk:VQuakr|talk]]) 06:31, 9 November 2010 (UTC) |
||
:A lot of people have spent a lot of time trying to help "fans" of Emily Schooley with the article on her. It's a shame that she does not yet have the coverage to support an article, but many editors, myself included, spent time looking for sources and reviewing the article to give pointers on where it might be improved. It's a shame that effort has not resulted in an appropriate article and that one or two of the editors involved have resorted to petty vandalism, when patience would have been a more effective tool - if Schooley has a successful career she will eventually get the coverage required for an article, whilst I doubt a wikipedia page is that useful as a promotional tool. As a way to thank others for their efforts, pointlessly vandalising articles is an odd gesture, whilst revenge is not a dish best served via Wikipedia. [[User:Bigger digger|Bigger digger]] ([[User talk:Bigger digger|talk]]) 10:31, 9 November 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 10:31, 9 November 2010
Could really care less about angry nerds on the internet. Oh noes!
Bye.
November 2010
- A lot of people have spent a lot of time trying to help "fans" of Emily Schooley with the article on her. It's a shame that she does not yet have the coverage to support an article, but many editors, myself included, spent time looking for sources and reviewing the article to give pointers on where it might be improved. It's a shame that effort has not resulted in an appropriate article and that one or two of the editors involved have resorted to petty vandalism, when patience would have been a more effective tool - if Schooley has a successful career she will eventually get the coverage required for an article, whilst I doubt a wikipedia page is that useful as a promotional tool. As a way to thank others for their efforts, pointlessly vandalising articles is an odd gesture, whilst revenge is not a dish best served via Wikipedia. Bigger digger (talk) 10:31, 9 November 2010 (UTC)