Jump to content

User talk:NovaSkola: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎WP:ANI thread: new section
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 242: Line 242:


Please note that [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#NovaSkola a thread] has been opened at [[WP:ANI]] which discusses your activity in the project. Please participate in the discussion there.--[[User:Ymblanter|Ymblanter]] ([[User talk:Ymblanter|talk]]) 13:57, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
Please note that [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#NovaSkola a thread] has been opened at [[WP:ANI]] which discusses your activity in the project. Please participate in the discussion there.--[[User:Ymblanter|Ymblanter]] ([[User talk:Ymblanter|talk]]) 13:57, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

==Edit war on [[Khojaly Massacre ]]==
Hello. You appear to be involved in an [[WP:EW|edit war]] on [[Khojaly Massacre ]].

While [[WP:3RR|the three-revert rule]] is hard and fast, please be aware that you can be blocked for edit warring without making 3 reverts to an article in 24 hours. You are not entitled to 3 reverts and edit wars may be slow-moving, spanning weeks or months. Edit wars are not limited to 24 hours.

If you are unclear how to resolve a content dispute, please see [[WP:DR|dispute resolution]]. You are expected to cooperatively engage other editors on talk pages rather than reverting their edits. Note that posting your thoughts on the talk page alone is not a license to continue reverting. You must reach consensus.

If you feel your edits might qualify as one of [[WP:3RRNO|the small list of exceptions]], please apply them with caution and ensure that anyone looking at your edits will come to the same conclusion. If you are uncertain, seek clarification before continuing. Quite a few editors have found themselves blocked for misunderstanding and/or misapplying these exceptions. Often times, requesting [[WP:RFPP|page protection]] or [[WP:SPI|a sockppuppet investigation]] is a much better course of action.

''Continued edit warring on [[Khojaly Massacre ]] or any other article may cause you to be blocked without further notice.'' [[User:Toddst1|Toddst1]] <small>([[User talk: Toddst1|talk]])</small> 18:45, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
==Notice of AA2==
You are now notified of the discretionary sanctions provisions of the [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2|''Armenia-Azerbaijan 2'' (AA) arbitration case]]:

{{quotation|[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] The [[WP:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] has permitted [[WP:Administrators|administrators]] to impose, at their own discretion, [[Wikipedia:General sanctions|sanctions]] on any editor working on pages broadly related to [[Armenia]]-[[Azerbaijan]] and related conflicts if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], any expected [[Wikipedia:Etiquette|standards of behavior]], or any [[Wikipedia:List of policies|normal editorial process]]. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2#Final decision]]. <!-- Template:uw-sanctions - {{{topic|{{{t}}}}}} -->
}}

In future, please take care to edit constructively on contested topic areas. When in disagreement with an editor over an aspect of article content, take the dispute to the talk page or to [[WP:dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]; do ''not'' use the revert function to repeatedly force through your preferred version of the page.
[[User:Toddst1|Toddst1]] <small>([[User talk: Toddst1|talk]])</small> 18:47, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:47, 31 December 2012

Arbcomm

You have been mentioned here as a party [1] --Khodabandeh14 (talk) 03:06, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation


Hello NovaSkola! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you  have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to  know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation  also appears on other accounts you  may  have, please complete the  survey  once only. 
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.


You are receiving this invitation because you  have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 12:37, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Guba Article

How is it vandalism when i am posting the Armenian side of the event? You claim the info i posted is one sided, have you read the article? There is no evidence in the article which proves Armenians were responsible and yet it claims Armenians were responsible. Like i stated in the summary of my revision the Armenian Genocide has a denial section because some people dont believe it took place so this article should have its own denial section as most people dont believe it happened. So you deleting it because you dont like it is an act of vandalism so i am giving you a warning here, if you keep deleting it i will report you. Ninetoyadome (talk) 18:57, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Area and population of Azerbaijan Democratic Republic

Hello, NovaSkola. You re-added area and population in the article Azerbaijan Democratic Republic. I think information like should not be based on partisan sources. Can you please explain your point in the talk page? Thank you. --vacio 13:01, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Произношение слово Bakı

Добрый вечер NovaSkola! Хотел бы спросить, правильное ли произношение слово Bakı здесь? hu.forvo.com/word/bak%C4%B1/#az Один мужчина из Турции, другой живёт в Бакы и говорят по разному. Хочу использовать на hu.wikipedia. Спасибо заранее. --Ilya Zhitomirsky (talk) 19:44, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Доброго дня. На английском как и на русском название города идет как Баку, а на Азербайджанском Бакы, на турецком идет как Бакю. Поетому для универсального использование юзать надо Баку, а если вы пользуйтесь оригинальное название города то Бакы. Надеюсь помог.--NovaSkola (talk) 01:12, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could all Azeri users check User:Yerevanci's relentless POV additions, lately in the Azerbaijan article.

Could all Azeri users check User:Yerevanci's relentless POV additions, lately in the Azerbaijan article.

This user constantly puts an inaccurate map about ethnic groups in Azerbaijan. Other users correctly remove it, but he puts it back. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.224.134.52 (talk) 17:55, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Valley of the Wolves: Karabakh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Valley of the Wolves: Karabakh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valley of the Wolves: Karabakh until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. BOVINEBOY2008 05:24, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could all Azeri users check User:Yerevanci's and User:Nocturnal781's relentless POV additions, lately in the Ermenikend article.

Could all Azeri users check User:Yerevanci's and User:Nocturnal781's relentless POV additions, lately in the Ermenikend article.

These users constantly change the correct article name of Ermenikend into the incorrect name of "Armenikend". Could all Azeri users prevent the taking over of articles about Azerbaijan by Armenian users with their biased nationalistic POV agenda. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.224.158.240 (talk) 12:01, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Eurovision: Discussion on the use of navigation templates

Hello,

There is currently a discussion ongoing at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision#Template duplications on the future use of navigation templates (navboxes) within Eurovision articles. The consequences of this discussion could have a large impact on how these templates are organized, named, and used in future, so all project members are invited to participate in the discussion.

You are receiving this message since you are listed as a member of WikiProject Eurovision. If you are no longer interested in contributing to Eurovision articles, please remove your username from this page.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Eurovision at 15:27, 11 March 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited 2012–13 Azerbaijan Premier League, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Gabala and Tovuz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link in article 'Faiq Hasanov'

Hi. The article 'Faiq Hasanov' has a dead link that could not be repaired automatically. Can you help fix it?


Dead: http://www.turneulregilor.ro/index1.php?lng=en&id=013

  • You added this in February 2010.
  • The bot tested this link on 17 April, 19 April and today, but it never worked.
  • The bot checked The Wayback Machine and WebCite but couldn't find a suitable replacement.

This link is marked with {{Dead link}} in the article. Please take a look at that article and fix what you can. Thank you!


PS- you can opt-out of these notifications by adding {{Bots |deny=BlevintronBot}} to your user page or user talk page. BlevintronBot (talk) 18:35, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Eurovision: Discussion on recategorizing

Hello,

There is currently a discussion ongoing at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision#Recategorising on the proposal of recategorising following the rollout exercise of the new navigation templates (navboxes) within Eurovision articles. The consequences of this discussion could have a large impact on how articles are reorganized in future to provide an easier index system, so all project members are invited to participate in the discussion.

You are receiving this message since you are listed as a member of WikiProject Eurovision. If you are no longer interested in contributing to Eurovision articles, please remove your username from this page.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Eurovision at 22:25, 24 April 2012 (UTC).[reply]


Mammadov & Yunisoğlu leaving Gabala

Hi,

Do you have a source for theses players leaving? I ask as both featured in the squad against Khazar Lankaran[1].

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - June 2012

Note: the Newsletter is "collapsed" for convenience. To see the full letter, click on the "show" button at the right end of the blue bar.

This Newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 00:17, 30 May 2012 (UTC). If you are no longer interested in WikiProject Eurovision then please remove your name from this list. [reply]

Project Eurovision RFC discussion reminder

WikiProject Eurovision: This is a reminder to all members of Project Eurovision, that there is still an ongoing RfC discussion taking place at the project talk page. It is vital that everyone participates in this discussion, as it concerns the future manual of style and article layout in regards to Eurovision Song Contest by Year and Junior Eurovision Song Contest by Year articles. This is your ideal opportunity to contribute suggestions and ideas on a major issue, which will reflect on the way these articles will be written in future. Thank You! EdwardsBot (talk) 14:12, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Simurq PFC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ukrainian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:22, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Warning: In the Azerbaijan article, the map of Azerbaijan showing its de-jure borders is relentlessly being replaced with map which shows Nagorno-Karabakh as a legitimate entity

User:MauriManya is relentlessly replacing in the infobox of the Azerbaijan article, the map "Azerbaijan (orthographic projection).svg" which shows Azerbaijan with its de-jure borders and is replacing it with the map "Azerbaijan with Nagorno Karabakh and region.svg" which shows Nagorno-Karabakh as a legitimate entity. The user is not impartial and neutral and is only and relentlessly doing this unilateral map replacement in the Azerbaijan article, but interstingly enough not in other articles of countries which are in the same situation as Azerbaijan. Could you watch this user and revert his unilateral map replacements of Azerbaijan in the country article. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.224.142.52 (talk) 08:53, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Azerbaijan Premier League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Champions League (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:03, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012–13 Azerbaijan First Division, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neftchala (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discusion on an article you editted

An article you edited is being considered for deletion. Please see the discussion at: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of football referees
Jrcrin001 (talk) 17:05, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Justice for Khojaly

It is not called the Nagorno Karabakh Oblast, it is considered "Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Region." Ninetoyadome (talk) 06:56, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Read the history of that event, it was oblast back then and stop arguing.--NovaSkola (talk) 07:00, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It's talking about the present time "Khojaly is a medium sized city in Nagorno Karabakh". Presently it is not called an oblast, it is called an Autonomous Region. If you want to talk about the past then change the sentence to "Khojaly was a medium sized city in Nagorno Karabakh Oblast". Ninetoyadome (talk) 07:05, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI thread

Please note that a thread has been opened at WP:ANI which discusses your activity in the project. Please participate in the discussion there.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:57, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war on Khojaly Massacre

Hello. You appear to be involved in an edit war on Khojaly Massacre .

While the three-revert rule is hard and fast, please be aware that you can be blocked for edit warring without making 3 reverts to an article in 24 hours. You are not entitled to 3 reverts and edit wars may be slow-moving, spanning weeks or months. Edit wars are not limited to 24 hours.

If you are unclear how to resolve a content dispute, please see dispute resolution. You are expected to cooperatively engage other editors on talk pages rather than reverting their edits. Note that posting your thoughts on the talk page alone is not a license to continue reverting. You must reach consensus.

If you feel your edits might qualify as one of the small list of exceptions, please apply them with caution and ensure that anyone looking at your edits will come to the same conclusion. If you are uncertain, seek clarification before continuing. Quite a few editors have found themselves blocked for misunderstanding and/or misapplying these exceptions. Often times, requesting page protection or a sockppuppet investigation is a much better course of action.

Continued edit warring on Khojaly Massacre or any other article may cause you to be blocked without further notice. Toddst1 (talk) 18:45, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of AA2

You are now notified of the discretionary sanctions provisions of the Armenia-Azerbaijan 2 (AA) arbitration case:

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose, at their own discretion, sanctions on any editor working on pages broadly related to Armenia-Azerbaijan and related conflicts if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2#Final decision.

In future, please take care to edit constructively on contested topic areas. When in disagreement with an editor over an aspect of article content, take the dispute to the talk page or to dispute resolution; do not use the revert function to repeatedly force through your preferred version of the page. Toddst1 (talk) 18:47, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]