User talk:Signedzzz

Big improvement on the neutrality od the Boko Haram background section. Thanks! 173.74.85.245 (talk) 15:57, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

How do you mean exactly? zzz (talk) 16:11, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Your welcome, I guess zzz (talk) 17:03, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

The edit to remove the section that was not well written. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boko_Haram&diff=632424781&oldid=632377590 173.74.85.245 (talk) 17:23, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Thanks.zzz (talk) 17:49, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

November 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Operation Onymous may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[Agora (online marketplace)|Agora]], [[Evolution (online marketplace)|Evolution]] and [[Andromeda (online marketplace|Andromeda]].<ref name=crypto/> Agora already offered more listings than Silk

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:10, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

2014 Hong Kong protest

If you find one of sources used in the article unreliable, go to Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard and ask about it. (That's someone else's suggestion, by the way.) --George Ho (talk) 06:19, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Do not suppress different opinions and remove contents without due justification. You will be reported to administrator if continuing to do so.

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Recreational drug use

added links pointing to DMT and Synthesize

Operation Onymous

added a link pointing to Tweet

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Can you please revert your edit

You recently made changes to the article Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant in this edit. I was notified of the situation by a fellow editor who correctly noted that the content had been decided on by the careful seeking of consensus as you will see through reference at Talk:ISIL. Please can you revert the edit. Gregkaye ✍♪ 14:23, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

I think my edit improves the article immensely, so I can't revert the edit. I explained the reasons in the edit summary. Sometimes editors get too attached to excess verbiage, and it requires someone else who hasn't been involved in its production to see what needs to go. The lead is clearly too long, and I identified the bits that just aren't worthwhile. I can only suggest you seek another opinion from another fresh pair of eyes. I believe the article is much better with the edit - I'm either right or wrong, I guess! If you want to add back

• the supposed "claims and aims" (According to who? when? depending on what? who thinks/believes any of this? etc) in the lead, and then finish with
• "The group's actions, authority and theological interpretations have been widely criticized around the world and notably within the Muslim community." (Why would you think that anyone needs to read that, exactly? What information does that impart? Etc...)

then I suggest you think of a reason for doing so. (Better than "that's what *we* decided")! zzz (talk) 16:37, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Disruptive editing at ISIL

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Myopia123 (talk) 21:36, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

Community sanctions block

To enforce a community decision, and for violating WP:1RR on the page Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, as described at WP:GS/SCW,

you have been blocked from editing for 48 hours. You are welcome to make useful contributions once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block. Your ability to edit this talk page has also been revoked. If you would like to be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-appeals-enlists.wikimedia.org. Bbb23 (talk) 01:34, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

---

Reminder to administrators:
Community sanctions are enacted by community consensus. In order to overturn this block, you must either receive the approval of the blocking administrator or seek consensus at a community noticeboard.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. again

General sanctions: Syrian Civil War and Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant

Please read this notification carefully:
A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date. PBS (talk) 15:49, 20 November 2014 (UTC)