User talk:Sankarrukku

Iyers

Hullo sir, how do u do? this is with regard to 'Iyers' Wikipedia article. I've just included a reference to the general belief that Iyers migrated to the south from other parts of India. I hope you dont mind. Besides, I also feel that Migrations to Tamil Nadu are more of a legendary character and might be included in 'Origins' rather than 'Migrations'.Also, I dont think references to Mulukanadu are relevant to 'Migrations to Tamil Nadu'.True, a number of Mulukanadu Brahmins have migrated to Tamil Nadu from time to time and are designated as 'Iyers' but then, Mulukanadu Brahmins of Andhra Pradesh like V.V.S.Laxman,etc. are also referred to as Iyers. See List of Iyers.Regards :-) -Ravichandar84 03:42, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Unfortunately this is only a belief. Many Tamil Brahmins would like to believe this as it gives them a common root with the so called Aryans of North India. Such claims are made by Namboothiris also. I have been searching for some clue or even collective memory about this migration for more than a decade with no success.

The article in Chennai on line is not an authority. This article talks about Gurukkal being the older brahmins. Gurukkals are followers of Saiva Siddhanta which originated in Kashmir in first century B.C. Most of the non-Brahmin forward castes in Tamil Nadu follow Saiva Siddhanta. They can also legitimately claim Kashmiri origin.

Articles in popular especially on line journals and web sites are seldom based on any research. Having evaluated thousands of sites as editor in ODP I am aware of this. For example the web site Kerala Iyers.com has completley ignored the Pandi Iyers.

Please revert to what I had stated. That avoids the inter caste/racial conflicts. Thanks.

About migrations it is a tricky problem. The Tamil Brahmins from Thirunelveli migrated to Nanjil Nadu (present Knayakumari district). When they came in it was Venadu which later became Travancore. Now it is part of Tamil Nadu. So are they migrants? Again how can you migrate to Kerala in 1600 when Kerala was formed only in 1956.

--Sankarrukku 06:44, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Devi Mahatmya

Busy in real life. will let you know.--Redtigerxyz 14:34, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Frankly speakly at this stage the article is hardly a B class article. Many things to do.--Redtigerxyz 05:56, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

I only reviewed the lead. I think there is a lot of work to be done. Why did you already archive the peer review? – Ilse@ 07:16, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Hello!

Hi Sankarukku! I just saw your wonderful work on Devi Mahatmya. I think if a few more sources dd added to the sourceless sections and if someone gives it a solid copyedit, it will be very close to an FA. Also, when you have the time can please take a look at Hinduism and Ganesha which are the other Hinduism articles that are close to FA. Thanks! Gizza^{Discuss ©} 04:00, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. I have revised some of the sections and standardized the references as suggested.--Sankarrukku 13:04, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Devanagari Font

Hi ! I wanted to ask you which devanagari font you used in Devi Mahatmya?? Thanks. --Redtigerxyz 09:41, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks.--Redtigerxyz 10:31, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Shanti Mantra

Thanks alot for your help in inproving Shanti Mantra article.

Lokesh 2000 04:50, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Mahakali and Chandi

As long as you ref matter, i am ok with its inclusion. Plz include this ref in Chandi too. Also, i think you can help in expanding the Mahakali article. --Redtigerxyz (talk) 05:02, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Please do not misunderstand. WP says that something that can be challenged should be referenced. It is not a well-known fact that Mahalakshmi temple is dedicated to the Mahalakshmi of the devi mahatmya, but it is supposed that it is dedicated to Lakshmi. see mention of temple in the article Lakshmi, even the Mahalaxmi temple (Kolhapur) link says so and The reason may be the association with Venkateshwara.--Redtigerxyz (talk) 04:58, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Iyer

An article that you have been involved in editing, Iyer has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments here . If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article.

Thanks

Thanks for your valuable input into the Hinduism discussion. Thanks Again --Sikh-History 22:06, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

About my changes that you reverted in the Iyer page.

As you reverted my changes regarding the fact "iyengars ranked above iyers" , citing errors in the book ,i can show you numerous errors in Edgar Thurston's "Caste & Tribes" book.

01. Thurston & Rangachari mention a one tummangutta vaishnavas . There is no such caste among iyengars .

02. Nowhere in this page had it ever been mentioned that these are the authors' own imaginative theories ,but have rather uploaded them as authentic facts .

03. The Kathleen Gough article mentions "smartha or Saivites". This need not neccessarily mean that she is equating smartha & shaivites as one.

04. If Kathleen's article is prone to deletion from being a reference, then all references given from "Caste & tribes" are to be deleted ,as the book is not uploaded for free viewing in google books, nor have anyone provided the isbn numbers for it.

05. If anything is irrelevant ,delete all references made from "Caste & Tribes..." first.

I'm sorry . But my change which you wrongly reverted still falls as valid under wiki norms, & i'm restoring it. I know that the irrelevance regarding continuity from the previuos line is true, as you stated . But if u r deleting it , i can still remove all references made from "Caste & Tribes". The thurston , Rangachari book has no free viewing at all in the internet ,& none from this community had ever provided any ISBN number for the book. Also the book has numerous errors in itself.

Adi Shankara's caste does have relevance. It gives an idea as to what the iyers were, before getting into Shankara sampradayam . Also ,one cannot rule out the namboodari admixture in the iyer population. By the way the namboodari origin of shankara is a fact ,and not an allegation from any author.

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Kanyakumari1.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Kanyakumari1.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kelly ^hi! 18:52, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Tenth Anniversary of Wikipedia Meetup announced

Wikipedia–Wikimedia Meetup
Kolkata, India

(view · edit · changes)

Please spread this news many people as you know. Thank in Advance. -- Jayanta Nath ^{(Talk|Contrb)} 16:39, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Smartism

It really depends on what region of India. According to an old 1920 reference (University of Michigan) (http://books.google.com/books?id=wRMaAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA293&dq=smarta&hl=en&ei=gIg_TZQcxZKBB6LplI8D&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CDQQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=smarta&f=false ) in the south, smarta= Advaita while in the North India, a smarta follower can belong to any of the six systems of Hindu philosphy. Raj2004 (talk) 02:39, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Sankarrukku. You have new messages at [[User talk:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mahasaraswati.jpg|User talk:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mahasaraswati.jpg]].
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Kiran Gopi (talk) 03:46, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

I had clearly stated that this is a Photograph by self of a painting in Vajreswari temple, Kangra, India. Taken with a 35 mm film camera. Print was scanned and converted to jpg image. The painting is more than 100 years old. I have clarified the position here. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Mahasaraswati.jpg Sankarrukku (talk) 05:55, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Kalighat Temple.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Kalighat Temple.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 02:19, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Invite to WikiConference India 2011

Hi Sankarrukku, The First WikiConference India is being organized in Mumbai and will take place on 18-20 November 2011. You can see our Official website, the Facebook event and our Scholarship form. But the activities start now with the 100 day long WikiOutreach. As you are part of WikiProject India community we invite you to be there for conference and share your experience. Thank you for your contributions.--Vythiri (talk) 06:44, 16 September 2011 (UTC) We look forward to see you at Mumbai on 18-20 November 2011

Warning

Please refrain from making reverts in Kerala Iyer article. You can utilize the talk page for discussions, and arrive at a consensus before making change in the article. If you continue reverts, you may get blocked. Thank you,--Vythiri (talk) 06:50, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

I started the discussion of this article in 2007. You should have joined the discussions before making any changes in the article. You failed to do so. Do so now. I have also posted in your talk page.Sankarrukku (talk) 07:39, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Smartism

Thanks for catching that. You are correct that Smarta brahmins are not exclusively Advaita.

Raj2004 (talk) 15:02, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Sankarrukku. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Editor assistance/Requests.
Message added 16:48, 24 September 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

About 3R rule

Dear user,

Please be aware that there are several dispute resolution methods in wikipedia. If you violate the WP:3R, you may get blocked. Please discuss in the talk page of Kerala Iyers before you make further reverts in the article. Thank you, --Chektomate (talk) 04:01, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Editor_assistance/Requests#My_edits_keep_getting_reverted._What_should_I_do.3F

Sankarrukku (talk) 04:21, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Warning for reverts

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively.

Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:

1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.--Chektomate (talk) 05:41, 26 September 2011 (UTC)