User talk:Perelada: Difference between revisions
BobaFett85 (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Because the article as it is was getting to large. Several editors besides me, including Mike McGregor (Can) and Jezarnold, expressed their concern about this before. I agreed with them. I asked them if they agree with my edit and they did so I moved the names, units and causes of death to the new article. The article coalition casualties in Afghanistan should be a short overview article in any case. You can easily now edit the new article. The additions of German, Canadian and UK casualties were also unnecesary since they have their own articles as well. You can adapt the new article as much as you want, the new article also includes a number of deaths you missed. But now your help is needed. The new article has been nominated for deletion. Your help to keep it and develope it even further would be apreciated.[[User:BobaFett85|BobaFett85]] ([[User talk:BobaFett85|talk]]) 10:07, 30 March 2009 (UTC) |
Because the article as it is was getting to large. Several editors besides me, including Mike McGregor (Can) and Jezarnold, expressed their concern about this before. I agreed with them. I asked them if they agree with my edit and they did so I moved the names, units and causes of death to the new article. The article coalition casualties in Afghanistan should be a short overview article in any case. You can easily now edit the new article. The additions of German, Canadian and UK casualties were also unnecesary since they have their own articles as well. You can adapt the new article as much as you want, the new article also includes a number of deaths you missed. But now your help is needed. The new article has been nominated for deletion. Your help to keep it and develope it even further would be apreciated.[[User:BobaFett85|BobaFett85]] ([[User talk:BobaFett85|talk]]) 10:07, 30 March 2009 (UTC) |
||
Listen I see you have gotten a bit too much worried. So I will try and help you feel better. All your data, everything you did to the article is not lost. You can always revert my edits and recover the data. No age or hometown was added on the new list because I created the article only a week ago and took the time to list the soldiers and circumstances first before doing anything else. We can add if you want their age and hometown to the article very easy. But we have to deal with this new problem now. I think you agree with me the list is needed. So let's try and keep the article from deletion. I already sent messages to three other editors who agree with us the list is needed so they can help us, I am confident they will respond when they get the messages. What you can do is to say at the discussion that you want the article to be keept. If we manage to keep it we will expand the article even further with their age and hometowns and even maybe go deeper into the circumstanes of their deaths. If they delete the article then we will return the information to the old article. Ok?[[User:BobaFett85|BobaFett85]] ([[User talk:BobaFett85|talk]]) 11:45, 30 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Personal attacks == |
== Personal attacks == |
||
Revision as of 11:47, 30 March 2009
Welcome!
Hello, Perelada, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Kingturtle (talk) 17:15, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Coalition casualties in in Afghanistan
Since you are a regular contributor to this article I would like to tell you that most of the content with the names and specific incidents of soldiers killed has been moved to other articles. A new article American Forces casualties in the war in Afghanistan has been created where all American soldiers killed will be listed from now on. Also the British, Canadian, Australian and German soldiers killed also have their own lists in their respectiv articles. Hope you contribute to them as well.BobaFett85 (talk) 07:26, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
Because the article as it is was getting to large. Several editors besides me, including Mike McGregor (Can) and Jezarnold, expressed their concern about this before. I agreed with them. I asked them if they agree with my edit and they did so I moved the names, units and causes of death to the new article. The article coalition casualties in Afghanistan should be a short overview article in any case. You can easily now edit the new article. The additions of German, Canadian and UK casualties were also unnecesary since they have their own articles as well. You can adapt the new article as much as you want, the new article also includes a number of deaths you missed. But now your help is needed. The new article has been nominated for deletion. Your help to keep it and develope it even further would be apreciated.BobaFett85 (talk) 10:07, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Listen I see you have gotten a bit too much worried. So I will try and help you feel better. All your data, everything you did to the article is not lost. You can always revert my edits and recover the data. No age or hometown was added on the new list because I created the article only a week ago and took the time to list the soldiers and circumstances first before doing anything else. We can add if you want their age and hometown to the article very easy. But we have to deal with this new problem now. I think you agree with me the list is needed. So let's try and keep the article from deletion. I already sent messages to three other editors who agree with us the list is needed so they can help us, I am confident they will respond when they get the messages. What you can do is to say at the discussion that you want the article to be keept. If we manage to keep it we will expand the article even further with their age and hometowns and even maybe go deeper into the circumstanes of their deaths. If they delete the article then we will return the information to the old article. Ok?BobaFett85 (talk) 11:45, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Personal attacks
Regarding your note, you seem to be arguing that there should be more, rather than less, information about the casualties - I would refer you to WP:NOT#MEMORIAL, which explicitly forbids us from including such information. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia; the sort of information you'd like to include would probably be better on another site. Incidentally, I'm not American, although I have served in my own country's armed forces and have great respect for my "brothers in arms" of whatever nationality. My nominating the article for deletion was purely an editorial policy decision, and I take the same view about any similar articles. EyeSerenetalk 11:17, 30 March 2009 (UTC)