User talk:174.3.155.181: Difference between revisions
→and the commons yelled...: new section |
just asking if i will be banned again if i request arbitration (due process) wrt baseless reversions (w/ no substantive defense) of my edits that showed James Gregory influenced Isaac Barrow "bigly" lol ("it's true, it's damn true"-Kurt Angle) |
||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
they said |
they said |
||
== asking if i'll be banned for asking for arbitration on a reasonable topic -- |
|||
{{Ping|Bbb23}} are you going to ban me again if i ask for arbitration upon expiration of the current ban? |
|||
Revision as of 21:40, 30 June 2017
 Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your host, To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. Review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.
 Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format. |
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. July 2016
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN talk to me 17:40, 26 July 2016 (UTC)- If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
misc
@David Eppstein: i think it's safe to say that @Ohnoitsjamie and NeilN: are the most fun to be around lol ;) lighten up guys wow. i didn't think using remaining space of my edit summary to share an INTERNAL (not EXTERNAL) link to The Last Waltz would get you so upset User:Ohnoitsjamie.
- your original request asked that i not waste the entire summary with lyrics, which was fair because i originally wasn't even summarising the content of my insertion which is bad. however i did summarise my edit and used the remaining space to share some good stuff, what's the harm in that? whatever lol 174.3.155.181 (talk) 21:43, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.
OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:46, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Note the editor currently using this IP has been blocked indefinitely. [1] --NeilN talk to me 23:49, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Hudson Hoagland
Hello, 174.3.155.181. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Hudson Hoagland".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 05:30, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:David Ingvar
Hello, 174.3.155.181. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "David Ingvar".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 07:52, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
and the commons yelled...
"... RELEASE THY BEAST"
they said
== asking if i'll be banned for asking for arbitration on a reasonable topic -- @Bbb23: are you going to ban me again if i ask for arbitration upon expiration of the current ban?