User talk:192.100.124.219

Hi. Dear Antonio garcia perez, Wikipedia is not a webhosting for resumees. We won't offer you a job. I just deleted the entry --Chris 73 Talk 10:53, Feb 7, 2005 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including:

• The use of a username of your choice
• The ability to view all your contributions via a "My contributions" link
• Your own user page
• Your own talk page which, if you choose, also allows users to send you messages without knowing your e-mail address
• The use of your own personal watchlist to which you can add articles that interest you
• The ability to rename pages
• The ability to upload images
• The ability to customize the appearance and behavior of the website
• The eligibility to become an administrator
• The right to be heard in votes and elections
• Your IP address will no longer be visible to other users.

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. We hope you enjoy your time here on Wikipedia as a Wikipedian! Thanks, Alphax ^τεχ 10:58, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

Esoteric language Magik

Your edit [1] was reverted. While Magik may not be the most knwon and popular tool it is actually used and quite sucessfull in its area. Nothing supports placing it among Esoteric programming language. Pavel Vozenilek 21:05, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

April 2006

Thanks for experimenting with the page Google economy on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. MD87 13:25, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

"Minor" edits

You seem to have tried to pass of a recent edit of Scandinavia as minor, though it was anything but minor. You removed plenty of wording that was essential and clearly POV:ed some of the map captions. You also added more info in the dablink, which is inappropriate and was reverted by me just a few edits ago. I reverted a lot of it, though not all. The changes you made to the lead just blurred the concept and removed minor, but very important wording. I kept the ones you made about the Fennoman movement and below.

Scandinavia has been through some disputes lately, so I would appreciate if you took more care to not sneak through edits by trying to label with dubious "(m)"s and, more importantly, that you motivate your changes at the talkpage.

Peter ^Isotalo 13:47, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Your editing habits don't seem to be particularly constructive at the moment. Try to make use of proper edit summaries and bring up any criticism you have on the talkpage. If you want to insert certain views, you should show that these are widely held by citing sources. The views of Wikipedia editors is really never a valid reason to change article content.

Peter ^Isotalo 13:25, 12 April 2006 (UTC)