User talk:208.107.26.26: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 06:55, 2 October 2011

October 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Miz, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —Darkwind (talk) 20:02, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

What was "non-constructive" about it? That I didn't further explain the 'undo'? I see changes and undos' made to this particular page (The Miz) all the time without further explanation. I figured my changes were pretty self-explanatory. I also don't see which change has been "reverted or removed". 208.107.26.26 (talk) 20:13, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring after a review of the reverts you have made on The Miz. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively.

Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.NJZombie (talk) 06:55, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 What was "non-constructive" about it? That I didn't further explain the 'undo'? I see changes and
 undos' made to this particular page (The Miz) all the time without further explanation. I figured my changes were pretty self-explanatory. I also don't see which change has been "reverted or removed". [[Special:Contributions/208.107.26.26|208.107.26.26]] ([[User talk:208.107.26.26#top|talk]]) 20:13, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
+[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=|link=]] Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]]&#32; after a review of the reverts you have made on [[:The Miz]]. Users are expected to [[Wikipedia:Consensus#Consensus-building in talk pages|collaborate and discuss]] with others and avoid editing [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptively]].<br>
+Please be particularly aware, the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] states that:
+# '''Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.'''
+# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.'''
+If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. You can post a request for help at an [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|appropriate noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing without further notice.'''<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->[[User:NJZombie|NJZombie]] ([[User talk:NJZombie|talk]]) 06:55, 2 October 2011 (UTC)