User talk:Reyk: Difference between revisions
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
|align=right}} |
|align=right}} |
||
Hello and welcome to my talk page. I'll respond to your comments here, unless you ask me to reply on your talk page. If I've left you a message on your talk page and you reply there, there's no need for you to come here and tell me; if I expect a reply I'll be watching your talk page so I'll find out about it anyway. Cheers! |
Hello and welcome to my talk page. I'll respond to your comments here, unless you ask me to reply on your talk page. If I've left you a message on your talk page and you reply there, there's no need for you to come here and tell me; if I expect a reply I'll be watching your talk page so I'll find out about it anyway. Cheers! |
||
== ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message == |
|||
<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;"> |
|||
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2021|2021 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2021#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. |
|||
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. |
|||
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2021/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small> |
|||
</td></tr> |
|||
</table> |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2021/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1056562944 --> |
|||
== June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive == |
== June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive == |
||
Revision as of 23:31, 14 July 2022
|
||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Prior to Oct 2017, I hand-archived.
These are the old archives:
- Archive 1 (21/9/05 - 13/1/06)
- Archive 2 (13/1/06 - 6/5/06)
- Archive 3 (6/5/06 - 30/6/08)
- Archive 4 (4/7/08 - 24/9/08)
- Archive 5 (24/9/08 - 9/1/09)
- Archive 6 (10/1/09 - 18/4/09)
- Archive 7 (20/4/09 - 18/1/10)
- Archive 8 (25/1/10 - 7/6/10)
- Archive 9 (16/6/10 - 10/10/10)
- Archive 10 (11/10/10 - 19/01/11)
- Archive 11 (23/1/11 - 27/01/12)
- Archive 12 (1/2/12 - 4/9/12)
- Archive 13 (22/10/2012 - 2/9/2015)
Hello and welcome to my talk page. I'll respond to your comments here, unless you ask me to reply on your talk page. If I've left you a message on your talk page and you reply there, there's no need for you to come here and tell me; if I expect a reply I'll be watching your talk page so I'll find out about it anyway. Cheers!
June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive
| Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive | |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. | |
ANI
At ANI one editor has essentially said that I should be indefenitely blocked from editing Wikipedia because in the last 2 weeks when there was an ANI against Lugnuts for uncivility attacking me for nominating some of the 93,547 articles he created for deletion, I have nominated 2 of that huge number of articles for deletion. So this seems to me to say that A-an ANI that has not been closed, and where it seems highly unlikely to close, is still binding on people and so I must abide by it, or be driven forever from Wikipedia. This is very much frustrating me. You and a few other editos expicitly said I had done nothing wrong. I have not tried specifically to target Lugnuts. Most of the AfDs I have started during this time frame have actually involved other editors. This whole process makes no sense to me. Lugnuts falsely accuses me of targeting him. On what grounds does this, because someone found his language objectionable enough to bring to ANI, then become grounds to bar me from nominating any of the 93,547 articles he creted for deletion. Especailly if it applies to the during of the ANI, which has now run over 2 weeks. This is very frustrating. Even more frustrating is the claim that I should be indefinately blocked from editing Wikipedia period for doing this. So Lugnuts can be rude to me, and as a result I have to stop nominating any articles he created for AfD? Where is this even policy.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:22, 17 June 2022 (UTC)