User talk:RobinK: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Nomination of List of important publications in cryptography for deletion at AfD |
|||
| (14 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
{{Usertalksuper}} |
{{Usertalksuper}} |
||
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:List of important publications in cryptography]] == |
|||
== I have marked you as a reviewer == |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]] |
|||
The article [[:List of important publications in cryptography]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]] because of the following concern: |
|||
I have added the "reviewers" property to your user account. This property is related to the [[Wikipedia:Pending changes|Pending changes]] system that is currently being tried. This system loosens page protection by allowing anonymous users to make "pending" changes which don't become "live" until they're "reviewed". However, logged-in users always see the very latest version of each page with no delay. A good explanation of the system is given in [http://myrandomnode.dyndns.org:8080/~gmaxwell/flagged_protection3.png this image]. The system is only being used for pages that would otherwise be protected from editing. |
|||
<blockquote>'''[[WP:NOTDATABASE]]'''</blockquote> |
|||
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]]. |
|||
If there are "pending" (unreviewed) edits for a page, they will be apparent in a page's history screen; you do not have to go looking for them. There is, however, a list of all articles with changes awaiting review at [[Special:OldReviewedPages]]. Because there are so few pages in the trial so far, the latter list is almost always empty. The list of all pages in the pending review system is at [[Special:StablePages]]. |
|||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:List of important publications in cryptography|the article's talk page]]. |
|||
To use the system, you can simply edit the page as you normally would, but you should also mark the latest revision as "reviewed" if you have looked at it to ensure it isn't problematic. Edits should generally be accepted if you wouldn't undo them in normal editing: they don't have obvious vandalism, personal attacks, etc. If an edit is problematic, you can fix it by editing or undoing it, just like normal. You are permitted to mark your own changes as reviewed. |
|||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> |
|||
The "reviewers" property does not obligate you to do any additional work, and if you like you can simply ignore it. The expectation is that many users will have this property, so that they can review pending revisions in the course of normal editing. However, if you explicitly want to decline the "reviewer" property, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. — Carl <small>([[User:CBM|CBM]] · [[User talk:CBM|talk]])</small> 12:33, 18 June 2010 (UTC) — Carl <small>([[User:CBM|CBM]] · [[User talk:CBM|talk]])</small> 13:00, 18 June 2010 (UTC) |
|||
'''<span style="color: red;">This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the [[Help:Introduction to navigating Wikipedia/4|history]] of each individual page for details.</span>''' Thanks, [[User:FastilyBot|FastilyBot]] ([[User talk:FastilyBot|talk]]) 09:01, 16 August 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:Alright, thanks. --[[User:RobinK|Robin]] ([[User talk:RobinK#top|talk]]) 13:36, 18 June 2010 (UTC) |
|||
== Nomination of [[:List of important publications in theoretical computer science]] for deletion == |
|||
<div class="afd-notice"> |
|||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article '''[[:List of important publications in theoretical computer science]]''' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]]. |
|||
The article will be discussed at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of important publications in theoretical computer science  (2nd nomination)]] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. |
|||
== [[Quantum phase estimation algorithm]] == |
|||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. |
|||
H Robin. Thanks for having a go at improving this article. However in doing so you have inadvertantly reverted some of my encyclopedic tone edits. Please restore these if you can in order to avoid the use of personal pronouns such as ''you'' and ''we'' and phrases that could be considered to be the opinion of the author: (<nowiki> {{cn}}</nowiki> tags). Thanks. --[[User:Kudpung|Kudpung]] ([[User talk:Kudpung|talk]]) 04:10, 25 September 2010 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User talk:Piotrus|<span style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> reply here</span>]]</sub> 10:16, 31 January 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:Ok, I got rid of the "we" in the lead. I did not remove any of your <nowiki> {{cn}}</nowiki> tags, only a <nowiki> {{whom}}</nowiki> tag, because the previous line proves the assertion. --[[User:RobinK|Robin]] ([[User talk:RobinK#top|talk]]) 04:22, 25 September 2010 (UTC) |
|||
== File:Decision Problem.png listed for deletion == |
|||
A file that you uploaded or altered, [[:File:Decision Problem.png]], has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Files for deletion]]. Please see the [[Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 January 2#File:Decision Problem.png|'''discussion''']] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> <span style="text-shadow:#808080 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em" class="texhtml">[[User:Hazmat2|The Haz]] <sub>[[User talk:Hazmat2|<font color="black">talk</font>]]</sub></span> 04:10, 2 January 2012 (UTC) |
|||
== Nomination of [[:List of important publications in cryptography]] for deletion == |
|||
== [[Simon's algorithm]] == |
|||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article [[:List of important publications in cryptography]], to which you have [https://xtools.wmflabs.org/authorship/en.wikipedia.org/List_of_important_publications_in_cryptography significantly contributed], is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or if it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]]. |
|||
The discussion will take place at '''[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of important publications in cryptography]]''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. |
|||
:''We have a [[random oracle]] relative to which [[Bounded-error probabilistic polynomial|BPP]] and [[BQP]] are separated. This is an improvement over the [[Deutsch-Jozsa algorithm]] separating [[P (complexity)|P]] from EQP. The oracle needs to be quantum and [[decoherence|nondecohering]].'' |
|||
I think what this is saying is that given a quantum oracle (running in [[BQP]] time?), the classic algorithm can't solve the problem as efficiently as quantum algorithm. It's a stronger example of the power of QC than the Deutsch-Jozsa algorithm. I don't quite understand the sentence either, but if you have another idea about how to capture this concept, it would be helpful. I don't know enough about quantum complexity to craft a sentence myself. [[User:Skippydo|Skippydo]] ([[User talk:Skippydo|talk]]) 14:43, 19 August 2012 (UTC) |
|||
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit [[User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier|the configuration page]]. Delivered by ''[[User:SDZeroBot|SDZeroBot]]'' ([[User talk:SDZeroBot|talk]]) 01:02, 8 June 2024 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template --> |
|||
::The first sentence is vague, but a fairly common interpretation of it would be that there is a random oracle separation between BQP and BPP. This is not known to be true, and conjectured to be false. The second sentence is OK, so I didn't remove it -- although I'll try to reword it to make it clearer. The last one about the oracle being quantum and decohering makes very little sense to me. If it just means that the oracle has to allow the quantum computer to make queries in quantum superposition, then that's part of the definition of what it means to give BQP oracle access. --[[User:RobinK|Robin]] ([[User talk:RobinK#top|talk]]) 15:07, 19 August 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:::Thank you for the explanation and the edits. You've been very helpful. [[User:Skippydo|Skippydo]] ([[User talk:Skippydo|talk]]) 20:29, 19 August 2012 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 01:02, 8 June 2024
| This is RobinK's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
 | Welcome to my talk page. Please adhere to the talk page guidelines and particularly the following:
|
The article List of important publications in cryptography has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:01, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of List of important publications in theoretical computer science for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of important publications in theoretical computer science (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:16, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of List of important publications in cryptography for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of important publications in cryptography, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of important publications in cryptography until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 8 June 2024 (UTC)