User talk:RobinK: Difference between revisions
Nomination of List of important publications in cryptography for deletion at AfD |
|||
| (37 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
{{Usertalksuper}} |
{{Usertalksuper}} |
||
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:List of important publications in cryptography]] == |
|||
== Mathematicians == |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]] |
|||
The article [[:List of important publications in cryptography]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]] because of the following concern: |
|||
This is one of the reasons that the term "priority" is better than "importance", which sounds much more judgmental. I don't have any sound way of determining priority for mathematician biographies, since I have only had to rate a handful of them at most. But my general opinion would be to look at the awards the person has received. So a Fields medalist is probably going to be a high-priority article, and someone who is well known in his or her area but not well-known among mathematicians in general would be low priority. |
|||
<blockquote>'''[[WP:NOTDATABASE]]'''</blockquote> |
|||
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]]. |
|||
On the other hand, I try not to worry too much about making perfect assessments. The overall idea is that other people can correct the ratings, os that over time the settle into the correct values. — Carl <small>([[User:CBM|CBM]] · [[User talk:CBM|talk]])</small> 02:51, 4 January 2010 (UTC) |
|||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:List of important publications in cryptography|the article's talk page]]. |
|||
== Project Recognized Content & A-Class Articles == |
|||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> |
|||
You had asked about adding support for A-Class articles in my bot. It was a popular request and I finally implemented it as I was able to allocate some time. I added a new content type parameter that allows you to specify a category for A-Class articles. See the [[User:JL-Bot/Project content|template]] for how to use. If there are any questions or issues with the results, let me know. --[[User:JLaTondre| JLaTondre]] ([[User talk:JLaTondre#top|talk]]) 00:20, 8 January 2010 (UTC) |
|||
'''<span style="color: red;">This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the [[Help:Introduction to navigating Wikipedia/4|history]] of each individual page for details.</span>''' Thanks, [[User:FastilyBot|FastilyBot]] ([[User talk:FastilyBot|talk]]) 09:01, 16 August 2022 (UTC) |
|||
== ratemath and empty talk pages == |
|||
== Nomination of [[:List of important publications in theoretical computer science]] for deletion == |
|||
<div class="afd-notice"> |
|||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article '''[[:List of important publications in theoretical computer science]]''' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]]. |
|||
The article will be discussed at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of important publications in theoretical computer science  (2nd nomination)]] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. |
|||
The problem with ratemath and empty talk pages has been fixed, thanks to help from AzaToth. [[MediaWiki_talk:Newarticletext#WARNING:_double-check_XHTML_validity_when_you_edit_the_page|This]] was what caused it – you can see why I was confused about what was wrong with my code. — Carl <small>([[User:CBM|CBM]] · [[User talk:CBM|talk]])</small> 19:54, 9 January 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:Nice, thanks. Works fine now. --[[User:RobinK|Robin]] ([[User talk:RobinK#top|talk]]) 21:39, 9 January 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. |
|||
== Additional; WoRC Request == |
|||
<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User talk:Piotrus|<span style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> reply here</span>]]</sub> 10:16, 31 January 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== Nomination of [[:List of important publications in cryptography]] for deletion == |
|||
I've received an additional request for the WoRC bot task. I'd like to get some additional input before implementing. If you wish, please comment at [[User talk:JL-Bot#Bolding items which have appeared on the Main page|this discussion]]. --[[User:JLaTondre| JLaTondre]] ([[User talk:JLaTondre#top|talk]]) 22:22, 11 January 2010 (UTC) |
|||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article [[:List of important publications in cryptography]], to which you have [https://xtools.wmflabs.org/authorship/en.wikipedia.org/List_of_important_publications_in_cryptography significantly contributed], is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or if it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]]. |
|||
The discussion will take place at '''[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of important publications in cryptography]]''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. |
|||
== Computational complexity of mathematical operations == |
|||
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit [[User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier|the configuration page]]. Delivered by ''[[User:SDZeroBot|SDZeroBot]]'' ([[User talk:SDZeroBot|talk]]) 01:02, 8 June 2024 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template --> |
|||
re: recent revert. I overlooked the definition of M(n) because it's buried in a specific table, yet used throughout the article. Maybe it should be moved out of the table in question? [[User:Pdokj|-kj]] ([[User talk:Pdokj|talk]]) 18:38, 30 January 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:Yes, feel free to do so. I just reverted because what you wrote was incorrect; I don't object to changing the placement of that text. --[[User:RobinK|Robin]] ([[User talk:RobinK#top|talk]]) 23:34, 30 January 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 01:02, 8 June 2024
| This is RobinK's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
 | Welcome to my talk page. Please adhere to the talk page guidelines and particularly the following:
|
The article List of important publications in cryptography has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:01, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of List of important publications in theoretical computer science for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of important publications in theoretical computer science (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:16, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of List of important publications in cryptography for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of important publications in cryptography, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of important publications in cryptography until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 8 June 2024 (UTC)