User talk:RobinK: Difference between revisions
Nomination of List of important publications in cryptography for deletion at AfD |
|||
(26 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown) | |||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
{{Usertalksuper}} |
{{Usertalksuper}} |
||
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:List of important publications in cryptography]] == |
|||
== DSPACE, etc. == |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]] |
|||
The article [[:List of important publications in cryptography]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]] because of the following concern: |
|||
Thanks for several corrections and a {{t1|dn}} fix. I don't know why I didn't see [[Alternation (complexity)]]... |
|||
<blockquote>'''[[WP:NOTDATABASE]]'''</blockquote> |
|||
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]]. |
|||
[[User:CRGreathouse|CRGreathouse]]<small> ([[User talk:CRGreathouse|t]] | [[Special:Contributions/CRGreathouse|c]])</small> 05:56, 5 March 2010 (UTC) |
|||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:List of important publications in cryptography|the article's talk page]]. |
|||
:No problem. You didn't see it because I fixed the disambiguation page for Alternation to list [[Alternation (complexity)]] instead of (algorithms), and created a redirect from (complexity) -> Alternating TM, after you were done disambiguating. --[[User:RobinK|Robin]] ([[User talk:RobinK#top|talk]]) 13:54, 5 March 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> |
|||
== AM,MA == |
|||
'''<span style="color: red;">This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the [[Help:Introduction to navigating Wikipedia/4|history]] of each individual page for details.</span>''' Thanks, [[User:FastilyBot|FastilyBot]] ([[User talk:FastilyBot|talk]]) 09:01, 16 August 2022 (UTC) |
|||
Hi Robin, thanks for the fix in [[Arthur–Merlin_protocol]]. I saw that the current condition for AM reads as follows (and is correct) |
|||
== Nomination of [[:List of important publications in theoretical computer science]] for deletion == |
|||
<div class="afd-notice"> |
|||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article '''[[:List of important publications in theoretical computer science]]''' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]]. |
|||
The article will be discussed at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of important publications in theoretical computer science  (2nd nomination)]] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. |
|||
*if ''x'' is not in ''L'', then <math>\Pr\nolimits_{y\in\{0,1\}^{p(n)}}(\forall z\in\{0,1\}^{q(n)}\,M(x,y,z)=0)\ge2/3.</math> |
|||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. |
|||
I wanted to note that it can be equally written as |
|||
<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User talk:Piotrus|<span style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> reply here</span>]]</sub> 10:16, 31 January 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== Nomination of [[:List of important publications in cryptography]] for deletion == |
|||
*if ''x'' is not in ''L'', then <math>\Pr\nolimits_{y\in\{0,1\}^{p(n)}}(\exists z\in\{0,1\}^{q(n)}\,M(x,y,z)=1)\le1/3.</math> |
|||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article [[:List of important publications in cryptography]], to which you have [https://xtools.wmflabs.org/authorship/en.wikipedia.org/List_of_important_publications_in_cryptography significantly contributed], is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or if it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]]. |
|||
The discussion will take place at '''[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of important publications in cryptography]]''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. |
|||
However, the second condition seems to go well together with the ''x'' is in ''L'' condition, as 2/3 and 1/3 add up to 1. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Sg313d|Sg313d]] ([[User talk:Sg313d|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sg313d|contribs]]) 07:37, 2 June 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit [[User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier|the configuration page]]. Delivered by ''[[User:SDZeroBot|SDZeroBot]]'' ([[User talk:SDZeroBot|talk]]) 01:02, 8 June 2024 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template --> |
|||
:I felt the first one contrasts better with the condition for ''x'' in ''L'', since for ''x'' in ''L'', the condition says that "there exists" something, I felt the condition for ''x'' not in ''L'' would look better if it said something like "for all". Both are correct though, and I wouldn't mind changing to the other definition if that seems clearer. Also, this way it looks similar to the definition of MA. --[[User:RobinK|Robin]] ([[User talk:RobinK#top|talk]]) 13:17, 2 June 2010 (UTC) |
|||
== I have marked you as a reviewer == |
|||
I have added the "reviewers" property to your user account. This property is related to the [[Wikipedia:Pending changes|Pending changes]] system that is currently being tried. This system loosens page protection by allowing anonymous users to make "pending" changes which don't become "live" until they're "reviewed". However, logged-in users always see the very latest version of each page with no delay. A good explanation of the system is given in [http://myrandomnode.dyndns.org:8080/~gmaxwell/flagged_protection3.png this image]. The system is only being used for pages that would otherwise be protected from editing. |
|||
If there are "pending" (unreviewed) edits for a page, they will be apparent in a page's history screen; you do not have to go looking for them. There is, however, a list of all articles with changes awaiting review at [[Special:OldReviewedPages]]. Because there are so few pages in the trial so far, the latter list is almost always empty. The list of all pages in the pending review system is at [[Special:StablePages]]. |
|||
To use the system, you can simply edit the page as you normally would, but you should also mark the latest revision as "reviewed" if you have looked at it to ensure it isn't problematic. Edits should generally be accepted if you wouldn't undo them in normal editing: they don't have obvious vandalism, personal attacks, etc. If an edit is problematic, you can fix it by editing or undoing it, just like normal. You are permitted to mark your own changes as reviewed. |
|||
The "reviewers" property does not obligate you to do any additional work, and if you like you can simply ignore it. The expectation is that many users will have this property, so that they can review pending revisions in the course of normal editing. However, if you explicitly want to decline the "reviewer" property, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. — Carl <small>([[User:CBM|CBM]] · [[User talk:CBM|talk]])</small> 12:33, 18 June 2010 (UTC) — Carl <small>([[User:CBM|CBM]] · [[User talk:CBM|talk]])</small> 13:00, 18 June 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:Alright, thanks. --[[User:RobinK|Robin]] ([[User talk:RobinK#top|talk]]) 13:36, 18 June 2010 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 01:02, 8 June 2024
This is RobinK's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
Welcome to my talk page. Please adhere to the talk page guidelines and particularly the following:
|
The article List of important publications in cryptography has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:01, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of List of important publications in theoretical computer science for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of important publications in theoretical computer science (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:16, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of List of important publications in cryptography for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of important publications in cryptography, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of important publications in cryptography until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 8 June 2024 (UTC)