User talk:RobinK: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 16:18, 7 February 2010

This is RobinK's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1: 30 days

Welcome to my talk page. Please adhere to the talk page guidelines and particularly the following:

Please post your new topic at the bottom of this page.
Please sign and date your entry by inserting "~~~~" at the end.
Please specify a descriptive "Subject/headline" for a new topic and separate subtopics by ===heading=== lines, if needed.
Please indent your posts with one more ":" than what you are replying to, i.e. begin with ":" if replying to an existing topic and "::" if replying to a reply.

I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your Talk page (or the article Talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page until you are responded to, or specifically let me know where you'd prefer the reply.

⇒ Start a new Talk topic.

ratemath and empty talk pages

The problem with ratemath and empty talk pages has been fixed, thanks to help from AzaToth. This was what caused it – you can see why I was confused about what was wrong with my code. — Carl (CBM · talk) 19:54, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nice, thanks. Works fine now. --Robin (talk) 21:39, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Additional; WoRC Request

I've received an additional request for the WoRC bot task. I'd like to get some additional input before implementing. If you wish, please comment at this discussion. -- JLaTondre (talk) 22:22, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Computational complexity of mathematical operations

re: recent revert. I overlooked the definition of M(n) because it's buried in a specific table, yet used throughout the article. Maybe it should be moved out of the table in question? -kj (talk) 18:38, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, feel free to do so. I just reverted because what you wrote was incorrect; I don't object to changing the placement of that text. --Robin (talk) 23:34, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 {{talkheader}}
 {{Usertalksuper}}
-== Mathematicians ==
-This is one of the reasons that the term "priority" is better than "importance", which sounds much more judgmental. I don't have any sound way of determining priority for mathematician biographies, since I have only had to rate a handful of them at most. But my general opinion would be to look at the awards the person has received. So a Fields medalist is probably going to be a high-priority article, and someone who is well known in his or her area but not well-known among mathematicians in general would be low priority.
-On the other hand, I try not to worry too much about making perfect assessments. The overall idea is that other people can correct the ratings, os that over time the settle into the correct values. &mdash;&nbsp;Carl <small>([[User:CBM|CBM]]&nbsp;·&nbsp;[[User talk:CBM|talk]])</small> 02:51, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
-== Project Recognized Content & A-Class Articles ==
-You had asked about adding support for A-Class articles in my bot. It was a popular request and I finally implemented it as I was able to allocate some time. I added a new content type parameter that allows you to specify a category for A-Class articles. See the [[User:JL-Bot/Project content|template]] for how to use. If there are any questions or issues with the results, let me know. --[[User:JLaTondre| JLaTondre]] ([[User talk:JLaTondre#top|talk]]) 00:20, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 == ratemath and empty talk pages ==