Jump to content

User talk:Romanski1996: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Final warning: Removing {{blpprod}} templates on Katerina Trajkova Nurdzhieva. (TW)
→‎October 2011: WP:3R Warning
Line 71: Line 71:


[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=|link=]] This is your '''last warning'''. The next time you remove [[Wikipedia:BLPPROD|Biographies of Living Persons prods]] without addressing the issue, as you did at [[:Katerina Trajkova Nurdzhieva]], you may be '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing without further notice'''. <!-- Template:uw-blpprod4 --> [[User:Crusio|Crusio]] ([[User talk:Crusio|talk]]) 07:24, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=|link=]] This is your '''last warning'''. The next time you remove [[Wikipedia:BLPPROD|Biographies of Living Persons prods]] without addressing the issue, as you did at [[:Katerina Trajkova Nurdzhieva]], you may be '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing without further notice'''. <!-- Template:uw-blpprod4 --> [[User:Crusio|Crusio]] ([[User talk:Crusio|talk]]) 07:24, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=|link=]] Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]]. Users are expected to [[Wikipedia:Consensus#Consensus-building in talk pages|collaborate and discuss]] with others and avoid editing [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptively]].<br>
Please be particularly aware, the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] states that:
# '''Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.'''
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.'''
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. You can post a request for help at an [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|appropriate noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing without further notice.'''<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:Jingiby|Jingby]] ([[User talk:Jingiby|talk]]) 07:32, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:32, 4 October 2011

Your edits

Welcome to wikipeia but can you please use edit summaries to explain why you are making changes. Some of your edits appear to be contentious e.g. removing all references to Ancient Macedonian kings and queens being of Greek origin when this is supported by the quoted references. If you are making contentious changes it is worth raising and discussing the changes on the article talk page first. NtheP (talk)

August 2011

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Fut.Perf. 20:38, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but your recent edits, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Jingby (talk) 06:02, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

Can you please stop? Most of your edits are not helpful at all. Fut.Perf. 13:08, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your reverts, before this issue escalates into an edit war. Given that you are making such edits look like vandalism from a newly registered account. Jingby (talk) 13:26, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article The nationality of Ancient Macedonians has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This appears to be an ureferenced content fork in relation to the article Macedonia naming dispute.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Singularity42 (talk) 13:58, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The nationality of the Macedonians for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The nationality of the Macedonians is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The nationality of the Macedonians until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Singularity42 (talk) 14:14, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

In a 2007 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user editing Balkans-related articles in a disruptive way. If you engage in further inappropriate behaviour in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article/topic ban. Thank you. Fut.Perf. 16:21, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but your recent edits, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Jingby (talk) 17:24, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Katerina Trajkova Nurdzhieva has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Crusio (talk) 09:17, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Katerina Trajkova Nurdzhieva requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Crusio (talk) 09:29, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Katerina Trajkova Nurdzhieva

Welcome to Wikipedia, thank you for taking the time to create a page here. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you created yourself. Because Wikipedia policy does not allow the creator of the page to remove deletion tags, an automated program has replaced the deletion tag you removed from Katerina Trajkova Nurdzhieva. Please do not continue to remove the deletion tag, instead, if you disagree with the deletion, you can follow these steps:

  1. Go to the page by clicking this link. Once there, select the button that says Click here to contest this speedy deletion.
  2. This will take you to the talk page, where you can make your case by explaining why the page does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do. For further help about the deletion, you could contact the user who first placed the tag or a highly active user who is willingly to help with deletion. This message was left by a bot, so please do not contact the bot about the deletion. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 09:30, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Katerina Trajkova Nurdzhieva. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 09:59, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Katerina Trajkova Nurdzhieva has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Crusio (talk) 08:30, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

Please do not remove Biographies of Living Persons prods from an article unless it contains at least one reliable source or was created before 18 March 2010, as you did with Katerina Trajkova Nurdzhieva. If you oppose the deletion of an article under this process, please consider sourcing the article or commenting at the respective talk page. Thank you. Crusio (talk) 10:30, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please, stop your unconstructive reverts. Read the talk-pages and added sources. Thank you. Jingby (talk) 05:17, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Together Under One Sun‎‎, without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Crusio (talk) 07:22, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove Biographies of Living Persons prods without addressing the issue, as you did at Katerina Trajkova Nurdzhieva, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Crusio (talk) 07:24, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively.

Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:

  1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jingby (talk) 07:32, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]