User talk:Samsara
Archives
Threads | Dates | Archive | |
1 to | 39 | September 2003 to February 20 2006 | 0 |
40 to | 82 | February 20 2006 to March 19 2006 | 1 |
83 to | 101 | up to and all of May 2006 | 2 |
102 to | 121 | June 2006 | 3 |
122 to | 169 | July 2006 | 4 |
170 to | 203 | 1 to August 19 2006 | 5 |
204 to | 234 | 19 August to 30 September 2006 | 6 |
235 to | 266 | October 2006 | 7 |
267 to | 305 | November 2006 | 8 |
306 to | 344 | December 2006 | 9 |
345 to | 384 | January to April 2007 | 10 |
385 to | 440 | May to December 2007 | 11 |
441 to | 471 | December 2007 to February 2008 | 12 |
472 to | 544 | 2008-2012 | 13 |
545 to | 626 | 2013-September 2015 | 14 |
627 to | 695 | October 2015-2016 | 15 |
696 to | 725 | First half of 2017 | 16 |
726 to | 807 | Second half of 2017 | 17 |
808 to | 834 | 2018 | 18 |
835 to | 899 | 2019 | 19 |
RfC invites 00 |
The article Canon PowerShot SX410 IS has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not notable. The article itself states that this camera did not receive significant coverage.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Qono (talk) 21:23, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The article Canon PowerShot SX400 IS has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This camera does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines and should be deleted. The article itself states that the camera did not receive significant coverage.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Qono (talk) 21:25, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – January 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2019).
|
|
- A request for comment asks whether partial blocks should be enabled on the English Wikipedia. If enabled, this functionality would allow administrators to block users from editing specific pages or namespaces, rather than the entire site.
- A proposal asks whether admins who don't use their tools for a significant period of time (e.g. five years) should have the toolset procedurally removed.
- Following a successful RfC, a whitelist is now available for users whose redirects will be autopatrolled by a bot, removing them from the new pages patrol queue. Admins can add such users to Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Redirect whitelist after a discussion following the guidelines at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Redirect whitelist.
- The fourth case on Palestine-Israel articles was closed. The case consolidated all previous remedies under one heading, which should make them easier to understand, apply, and enforce. In particular, the distinction between "primary articles" and "related content" has been clarified, with the former being
the entire set of articles whose topic relates to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly interpreted
rather thanreasonably construed
. - Following the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Beeblebrox, Bradv, Casliber, David Fuchs, DGG, KrakatoaKatie, Maxim, Newyorkbrad, SoWhy, Worm That Turned, Xeno.
- The fourth case on Palestine-Israel articles was closed. The case consolidated all previous remedies under one heading, which should make them easier to understand, apply, and enforce. In particular, the distinction between "primary articles" and "related content" has been clarified, with the former being
- This issue marks three full years of the Admin newsletter. Thanks for reading!
Administrators' newsletter – February 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2020).
|
|
- Following a request for comment, partial blocks are now enabled on the English Wikipedia. This functionality allows administrators to block users from editing specific pages or namespaces rather than the entire site. A draft policy is being workshopped at Wikipedia:Partial blocks.
- The request for comment seeking the community's sentiment for a binding desysop procedure closed with
wide-spread support for an alternative desysoping procedure based on community input
. No proposed process received consensus.
- Twinkle now supports partial blocking. There is a small checkbox that toggles the "partial" status for both blocks and templating. There is currently one template: {{uw-pblock}}.
- When trying to move a page, if the target title already exists then a warning message is shown. The warning message will now include a link to the target title. [1]
- Following a recent arbitration case, the Arbitration Committee reminded administrators
that checkuser and oversight blocks must not be reversed or modified without prior consultation with the checkuser or oversighter who placed the block, the respective functionary team, or the Arbitration Committee.
- Following a recent arbitration case, the Arbitration Committee reminded administrators
- Voting in the 2020 Steward elections will begin on 08 February 2020, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 28 February 2020, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
- The English Wikipedia has reached six million articles. Thank you everyone for your contributions!
Administrators' newsletter – March 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2020).
- Following an RfC, the blocking policy was changed to state that sysops
must not
undo or alter CheckUser or Oversight blocks, rather thanshould not
. - A request for comment confirmed that sandboxes of established but inactive editors may not be blanked due solely to inactivity.
- Following an RfC, the blocking policy was changed to state that sysops
- Following a discussion, Twinkle's default CSD behavior will soon change, most likely this week. After the change, Twinkle will default to "tagging mode" if there is no CSD tag present, and default to "deletion mode" if there is a CSD tag present. You will be able to always default to "deletion mode" (the current behavior) using your Twinkle preferences.
- Following the 2020 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: BRPever, Krd, Martin Urbanec, MusikAnimal, Sakretsu, Sotiale, and Tks4Fish. There are a total of seven editors that have been appointed as stewards, the most since 2014.
- The 2020 appointees for the Ombudsman commission are Ajraddatz and Uzoma Ozurumba; they will serve for one year.
Administrators' newsletter – April 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2020).
|
- There is an ongoing request for comment to streamline the source deprecation and blacklisting process.
- There is a plan for new requirements for user signatures. You can give feedback.
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold a
Arbcom RfC regarding on-wiki harassment
. A draft RfC has been posted at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Anti-harassment RfC (Draft) and not open to comments from the community yet. Interested editors can comment on the RfC itself on its talk page.
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold a
- The WMF has begun a pilot report of the pages most visited through various social media platforms to help with anti-vandalism and anti-disinformation efforts. The report is updated daily and will be available through the end of May.
The file File:Tuatara wedge.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – May 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2020).
- Discretionary sanctions have been authorized for all pages and edits related to COVID-19, to be logged at WP:GS/COVID19.
- Following a recent discussion on Meta-Wiki, the edit filter maintainer global group has been created.
- A request for comment has been proposed to create a new main page editor usergroup.
- A request for comment has been proposed to make the bureaucrat activity requirements more strict.
- The Editing team has been working on the talk pages project. You can review the proposed design and share your thoughts on the talk page.
- Enterprisey created a script that will show a link to the proper Special:Undelete page when viewing a since-deleted revision, see User:Enterprisey/link-deleted-revs.
- A request for comment closed with consensus to create a Village Pump-style page for communication with the Wikimedia Foundation.
Werner Heisenberg
Hi there, please remove the pending changes protection of Werner Heisenberg. I belive it's no longer applicable. comrade waddie96 (talk) 18:05, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- While I don't share your optimism and would observe that it was needed as recently as March, I will disable it as a test per your request. Thanks for the heads-up. Samsara 10:24, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Redundant protection at 1
The page is both indefinite pending-changes protected and indefinite semi-protected. The first of these is therefore apparently redundant. I see you were the last one involved in protecting the page. Mind fixing this needless redundancy? Thanks, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 03:12, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
- The verb "fixing" does not apply to things that cause no issues. Furthermore, there is an unresolved bug that makes keeping PC active the currently correct practice. Samsara 11:35, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – June 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2020).
CaptainEek • Creffett • Cwmhiraeth
Anna Frodesiak • Buckshot06 • Ronhjones • SQL
- A request for comment asks whether the Unblock Ticket Request System (UTRS) should allowed any unblock request or just private appeals.
- The Wikimedia Foundation announced that they will develop a universal code of conduct for all WMF projects. There is an open local discussion regarding the same.
Administrators' newsletter – July 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2020).
- A request for comment is in progress to remove the T2 (template that misrepresents established policy) speedy deletion criterion.
- Protection templates on mainspace pages are now automatically added by User:MusikBot II (BRFA).
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold an
RfC regarding on-wiki harassment
. The RfC has been posted at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Anti-harassment RfC and is open to comments from the community. - The Medicine case was closed, with a remedy authorizing standard discretionary sanctions for
all discussions about pharmaceutical drug prices and pricing and for edits adding, changing, or removing pharmaceutical drug prices or pricing from articles
.
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold an
BOTN
In case you were not aware, there is a discussion at BOTN regarding a bot you have blocked. Your participation would be appreciated. Primefac (talk) 20:20, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Please add page protection level for CBS Sports & NBC Sports
Hello, Samsara (talk), I was wondering if there would be a way you or any other admin could please add a protection level to the CBS Sports & NBC Sports articles here on Wikipedia? There's plenty of vandals out there who keep making disruptive edits by adding text claiming that both CBS & NBC broadcast NBA games on CBS & NBC. Neither claim is factually correct. I'd greatly appreciate it if you or another admin could please add a protection level to both articles preventing these sockpuppet accounts from futher vandalizing these articles. Please help? Thank you in advance. Charlesaaronthompson (talk) 15:35, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – August 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2020).
- There is an open request for comment to decide whether to increase the minimum duration a sanction discussion has to remain open (currently 24 hours).
- Speedy deletion criterion T2 (template that misrepresents established policy) has been repealed following a request for comment.
- Speedy deletion criterion X2 (pages created by the content translation tool) has been repealed following a discussion.
- There is a proposal to restrict proposed deletion to confirmed users.
Happy First Edit Day!
Happy First Edit Day!
Reduce protection level of Nickelodeon Kid's Choice Awards pages
You've indefinitely semi-protected a bunch of Nickelodeon's kid's choice award pages due to long term abuse. Would it be possible for you to reduce the protection levels on those pages to pending changes? They've been very infrequently edited since protection. Full list of affected pages:
- 2005 Kids' Choice Awards
- 2006 Kids' Choice Awards
- 2007 Kids' Choice Awards
- 2008 Kids' Choice Awards
- 2009 Kids' Choice Awards
- 2010 Kids' Choice Awards
- 2011 Kids' Choice Awards
- 2013 Kids' Choice Awards
- 2014 Kids' Choice Awards
- 2015 Kids' Choice Awards
- 2016 Kids' Choice Awards
- 2017 Kids' Choice Awards
Chess (talk) (please use {{ping|Chess}}
on reply) 02:36, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- I don't understand this request - "been very infrequently edited since protection" is the intended effect. There is no expectation that articles of historic award ceremonies will continue to receive legit edits at a high rate. Samsara 00:56, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2020).
- Following a request for comment, the minimum length for site ban discussions was increased to 72 hours, up from 24.
- A request for comment is ongoing to determine whether paid editors
must
orshould
use the articles for creation process. - A request for comment is open to resolve inconsistencies between the draftification and alternative to deletion processes.
- A request for comment is open to provide an opportunity to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the 2020 English Wikipedia Arbitration Committee election and to resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.
- An open request for comment asks whether active Arbitrators may serve on the Trust and Safety Case Review Committee or Ombudsman commission.
Hello?
Just checking in to see how you're doing, Sam!! Long time - no hear. Atsme Talk 📧 22:52, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- Hi @Atsme: Nice to hear from you. I'm doing okay, thanks. How are you? Samsara 00:43, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
- Surviving!! I was just checking in because I haven't heard from you in a while. I feel better now. Are you getting through the COVID pandemic relatively unscathed? Atsme 💬 📧 00:47, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
- Have so far not tested positive, so either haven't caught it, or I am/have been asymptomatic. But I don't mingle as much and I adhere, literally, to masks and soap. What about you - when you write "surviving", one might be concerned... Samsara 00:51, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
- Mine is more with reference to WP.
I'm enjoying life on Bonaire where we've been blessed to have very few COVID cases, but unfortunately, 2 deaths. We're at -0- new cases now, so Saturday night is mine for the taking and I'm headed out the door!! Take care, Sam - enjoy the weekend and happy editing! Atsme 💬 📧 01:06, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
- Mine is more with reference to WP.
- Have so far not tested positive, so either haven't caught it, or I am/have been asymptomatic. But I don't mingle as much and I adhere, literally, to masks and soap. What about you - when you write "surviving", one might be concerned... Samsara 00:51, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
- Surviving!! I was just checking in because I haven't heard from you in a while. I feel better now. Are you getting through the COVID pandemic relatively unscathed? Atsme 💬 📧 00:47, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
The article Samsung NX 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 OIS has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NPRODUCT.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rogermx (talk) 01:35, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2020).
Ajpolino • LuK3
Jackmcbarn
Ad Orientem • Harej • Lid • Lomn • Mentoz86 • Oliver Pereira • XJaM
There'sNoTime → TheresNoTime
- A request for comment found consensus that incubation as an alternative to deletion should generally only be recommended when draftification is appropriate, namely
1) if the result of a deletion discussion is to draftify; or 2) if the article is newly created
.
- A request for comment found consensus that incubation as an alternative to deletion should generally only be recommended when draftification is appropriate, namely
- The filter log now provides links to view diffs of deleted revisions (phab:T261630).
- The 2020 CheckUser and Oversight appointment process has begun. The community consultation period will take place from September 27th to October 7th.
- Following a request for comment, sitting Committee members may not serve on either the Ombuds Commission or the WMF Case Review Committee. The Arbitration Committee passed a motion implementing those results into their procedures.
- The Universal Code of Conduct draft is open for community review and comment until October 6th, 2020.
- Office actions may now be appealed to the Interim Trust & Safety Case Review Committee.
Halloween and LGBT People
Hello Samsara--I am doing some research on Halloween and discovering that there is a long historical relationship between LGBTQ+ people and Halloween, and that Halloween--similar to Carnival--has been a very queer holiday. I would like to add some of that information to the Halloween article but need access to do so. Please let me know if I would be allowed access. Thanks! RachelWex (talk) 22:43, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
- Hi @RachelWex: your account was upgraded to extended confirmed user in 2016. That's like level 2. Editing the article should only require level 1 ("autoconfirmed") per the configuration made to it, so you should be able to edit. If you are experiencing problems, they are not to do with the protection settings of the article. Perhaps you were trying to edit during a database lock? Try again and if you encounter error messages, maybe take them to WP:VP/T, where you'll get a quicker response than I can usually give right now. Samsara 00:33, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – November 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2020).
|
|
- Community sanctions now authorize administrators to place under indefinite semiprotection
any article on a beauty pageant, or biography of a person known as a beauty pageant contestant, which has been edited by a sockpuppet account or logged-out sockpuppet
, to be logged at WP:GS/PAGEANT.
- Community sanctions now authorize administrators to place under indefinite semiprotection
- Sysops will once again be able to view the deleted history of JS/CSS pages; this was restricted to interface administrators when that group was introduced.
- Twinkle's block module now includes the ability to note the specific case when applying a discretionary sanctions block and/or template.
- Sysops will be able to use Special:CreateLocalAccount to create a local account for a global user that is prevented from auto-creation locally (such as by a filter or range block). Administrators that are not sure if such a creation is appropriate should contact a checkuser.
- The 2020 Arbitration Committee Elections process has begun. Eligible editors will be able to nominate themselves as candidates from November 8 through November 17. The voting period will run from November 23 through December 6.
- The Anti-harassment RfC has concluded with a summary of the feedback provided.
- A reminder that
standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people.
(American Politics 2 Arbitration case).
- A reminder that
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
Administrators' newsletter – December 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2020).
Andrwsc • Anetode • GoldenRing • JzG • LinguistAtLarge • Nehrams2020
Interface administrator changes
- There is a request for comment in progress to either remove T3 (duplicated and hardcoded instances) as a speedy deletion criterion or eliminate its seven-day waiting period.
- Voting for proposals in the 2021 Community Wishlist Survey, which determines what software the Wikimedia Foundation's Community Tech team will work on next year, will take place from 8 December through 21 December. In particular, there are sections regarding administrators and anti-harassment.
- Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee Elections is open to eligible editors until Monday 23:59, 7 December 2020 UTC. Please review the candidates and, if you wish to do so, submit your choices on the voting page.
Please see an unprotect request
Please see the unprotect request at User_talk:BethNaught#Hanukkah regarding the Hanukkah article which was indefinitely protected in 2016. Debresser (talk) 23:59, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
Immune system protection
I saw your note after I protected that article (and made a hash of it in doing it). I did it for 12 hours, after reviewing some of the vandalism and figuring 12 hours would take it past it being TFA. --Hammersoft (talk) 01:33, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
- According to server time, it's now yesterday's FA, so I think your decision is fine. Just because we haven't, as far as I can recall, interacted before, I want to make sure you're aware of the convention of generally not protecting the TFA to allow newbies to get a first taste of editing Wikipedia. The idea is to especially not protect it while it's the main article, so in that light, as I said, what you did seems fine. Cheers, Samsara 01:41, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
- Concur. Thanks for the tip! --Hammersoft (talk) 02:26, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Protected page
You protected the page for three years. Guess what? I have a calendar. And my calendar is now set for three years from today. You cannot stop me!
2600:100E:B135:B368:3641:DD96:DC8E:1214 (talk) 08:17, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
Protection
Why this page is unprotected now?. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 18:43, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
- Fixed. Samsara 18:52, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks. But it was indefinitely ECP before. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 19:04, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
- I can see one recent edit that would have benefited, from DarkArmy - are there others? Samsara 19:55, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
- Well, sorta... they did participate in discussion. Samsara 19:57, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
- I can see one recent edit that would have benefited, from DarkArmy - are there others? Samsara 19:55, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks. But it was indefinitely ECP before. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 19:04, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – January 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2020).
|
|
- Speedy deletion criterion T3 (duplication and hardcoded instances) has been repealed following a request for comment.
- You can now put pages on your watchlist for a limited period of time.
- By motion, standard discretionary sanctions have been temporarily authorized
for all pages relating to the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes)
. The effectiveness of the discretionary sanctions can be evaluated on the request by any editor after March 1, 2021 (or sooner if for a good reason). - Following the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Barkeep49, BDD, Bradv, CaptainEek, L235, Maxim, Primefac.
- By motion, standard discretionary sanctions have been temporarily authorized
A barnstar for you!
The Admin's Barnstar | |
Did you just protect TWO pages I was involved with? Good work on WP:RFPP in the last 24 hours. Scorpions13256 (talk) 19:52, 18 January 2021 (UTC) |
- Thank you, Scorpions13256. I used to be a lot more active at RfPP a few years ago, let's see if I can claw my way back to previous activity levels (probably not, but I'll try to make a contribution when time permits.) In any case, I appreciate the award. Samsara 20:02, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
Rihanna
Seeing as Tbhotch was vandalising the page the most, shouldn’t it be extended for a little while so that genuine editors can edit it without being penalised for it? 2A04:4A43:44FF:996D:5C57:B872:3441:E7FB (talk) 20:57, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Adding pp-vandalism and pp-pc1 in Johannesburg
Hello samsara, because you are protected Johannesburg in semi for 3 months and indefinite pending changes. Please adding pp-vandalism and pp-pc1 in the article. Thanks. 110.137.190.132 (talk) 11:41, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for your attention to this detail. We have bots who do that. Regards, Samsara 11:42, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Michael Spence
The section you added on the no-confidence vote is already in the article (under "Fundraising and expansion of the university"): When international student numbers did not reach an expected increase in 2012, the university was forced to make staff redundant, in response to which 80 of the university's Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences teaching staff voted on a motion of no confidence in Spence.
. This is why it is so hard to explain this at RPP - the IP users are in part removing material that is already there. Deus et lex (talk) 13:07, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- Happy to change to "more than 80" and add "overwhelmingly endorsed" though. Deus et lex (talk) 13:08, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- I have combined into the one section. By the way, the accusation of sockpuppetry was totally unfair and unreasonable. Deus et lex (talk) 13:19, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- I made no such accusation. I laid out facts that could have been explained in other ways. Samsara 13:21, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- I don't understand why I make a complaint to help improve an article and instead end up being the one that is complained about. How is that helpful? Deus et lex (talk) 13:29, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- I made no such accusation. I laid out facts that could have been explained in other ways. Samsara 13:21, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- I have combined into the one section. By the way, the accusation of sockpuppetry was totally unfair and unreasonable. Deus et lex (talk) 13:19, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- Happy to change to "more than 80" and add "overwhelmingly endorsed" though. Deus et lex (talk) 13:08, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for improving the article, and apologies for being cranky with you yesterday. Even if you choose to take no further action on the RPP, I'd be grateful if you could keep an eye on the article at least, the IPs have been reverting far more than what you have added in. Deus et lex (talk) 00:02, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Protected article
Hi!
On 19:49, 27 January 2021 you protected Andrés Arauz, something that seems to be a reasonable precautionary measure. However, some old vandalism dating back to 20 January remains and can't be fixed in <ref name=":0">{{Cite web|date=2016-08-12|title=Andrés Arauz nuevo[…]. See https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Andr%C3%A9s_Arauz&type=revision&diff=1003871804&oldid=1001611559
Thanks for fixing and have a nice day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.195.158.232 (talk) 00:32, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Done Thank you. Samsara 03:35, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – February 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2021).
- The standard discretionary sanctions authorized for American Politics were amended by motion to cover
post-1992 politics of United States and closely related people
, replacing the 1932 cutoff.
- The standard discretionary sanctions authorized for American Politics were amended by motion to cover
- Voting in the 2021 Steward elections will begin on 05 February 2021, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2021, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
- Wikipedia has now been around for 20 years, and recently saw its billionth edit!
User acting childish and raging for no reason
A user by the name of TVFan88 has been acting very childish such as raging in all caps, whining over little things, etc, he also has been attacking me by constantly edit warring against me in a childish manner, he seems to also have anger issues. I think you should block him until further notice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pong3SouthFrieza34 (talk • contribs) 03:03, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
- Which articles is this affecting? Samsara 03:33, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
- It seems to be affecting the Horrid Henry (TV series) page, but I do believe Pong3SouthFrieza34 is telling the truth as unlike TVFan88, he doesn't seem to be raging and he also is providing a source, while TVFan88 is going crazy at him for no reason at all and is calling it fake with no evidence either.
This drama is over, The reasons i put up a UNO reverse card, You have been Edit warring along with other users Edit warring, restoring hoax on that page! some users are sockpuppets, And they restore hoaxes for no reason, The source is fake, It's inspect Element, And also this is very Cringy nowadays, And it's fake news, You are acting like Fox News! That's why i put up the UNO Reverse Card here so you can stay away from this page and restoring hoax, You and your little lies, It wasn't me That i did, It was you, I can't stand with this cringe, It has to stop.
THANK YOU!
-TVFan88 11:30PM — Preceding unsigned comment added by TVFan88 (talk • contribs) 04:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
No TVFan, you need stop this, you are acting childish by going back and forth with him, especially you TVFan, as you have been making rather ridiculous comparsions, like are you really comparing a whole entire News station to one single user? Also enough with the childish and amateur comments such as "Cringey" or "UNO Reverse card" as it makes you look even more childish than you already are. Not to mention, DO YOU EVEN HAVE PROOF IT'S INSPECT ELEMENT? No? then OK, it will stay until the time being.
UNO Reverse Card
-TVFan88 (talk) 3:00PM EST — Preceding undated comment added 20:00, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Is that all you say? UNO Reverse Card? Do you really think that's funny? Well it's not, I wouldn't be surprised if you were one of those generic Gotards that like to act childish for no reason. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coolman971 (talk • contribs) 19:40, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator EvergreenFir. Samsara 08:19, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – March 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2021).
Interface administrator changes
- A request for comment is open that proposes a process for the community to revoke administrative permissions. This follows a 2019 RfC in favor of creating one such a policy.
- A request for comment is in progress to remove F7 (invalid fair-use claim) subcriterion a, which covers immediate deletion of non-free media with invalid fair-use tags.
- A request for comment seeks to grant page movers the
delete-redirect
userright, which allows moving a page over a single-revision redirect, regardless of that redirect's target. The full proposal is at Wikipedia:Page mover/delete-redirect. - A request for comment asks if sysops may
place the General sanctions/Coronavirus disease 2019 editnotice template on pages in scope that do not have page-specific sanctions
? - There is a discussion in progress concerning automatic protection of each day's featured article with Pending Changes protection.
- When blocking an IPv6 address with Twinkle, there is now a checkbox with the option to just block the /64 range. When doing so, you can still leave a block template on the initial, single IP address' talkpage.
- When protecting a page with Twinkle, you can now add a note if doing so was in response to a request at WP:RfPP, and even link to the specific revision.
- There have been a number of reported issues with Pending Changes. Most problems setting protection appear to have been resolved (phab:T273317) but other issues with autoaccepting edits persist (phab:T275322).
- By motion, the discretionary sanctions originally authorized under the GamerGate case are now authorized under a new Gender and sexuality case, with sanctions
authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to, any gender-related dispute or controversy and associated people.
Sanctions issued under GamerGate are now considered Gender and sexuality sanctions. - The Kurds and Kurdistan case was closed, authorizing standard discretionary sanctions for
the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed
.
- By motion, the discretionary sanctions originally authorized under the GamerGate case are now authorized under a new Gender and sexuality case, with sanctions
- Following the 2021 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: AmandaNP, Operator873, Stanglavine, Teles, and Wiki13.
You placed the Toyota Camry article under the Pending Changes protection on October 13, 2017 (apparently with no specified expiration date). It seems that the article has remained under the PC protection since then. Could you please unprotect the article now? Per the WP:PCPP policy, "Indefinite PC protection should be used only in cases of severe long-term disruption," and that's not really the case here. Looking at the article's history for February-March, I don't see a few edits that were not accepted but they did not appear to have been actual vandalism. I don't think the article qualifies for PC protection now, as there is no active vandalism or BLP or copyright violations there. Thanks, Nsk92 (talk) 12:17, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Black panther
Hello, I see you have placed PCP on Black panther. However, this is giving autoconfirmed users an edge in edit wars, which can be problematic. Would you consider unprotecting? Thanks! Firestar464 (talk) 01:15, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Recent edits convince me that it should remain thusly protected. Samsara 02:02, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – April 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2021).
Alexandria • Happyme22 • RexxS
- Following a request for comment, F7 (invalid fair-use claim) subcriterion a has been deprecated; it covered immediate deletion of non-free media with invalid fair-use tags.
- Following a request for comment, page movers were granted the
delete-redirect
userright, which allows moving a page over a single-revision redirect, regardless of that redirect's target.
- When you move a page that many editors have on their watchlist the history can be split and it might also not be possible to move it again for a while. This is because of a job queue problem. (T278350)
- Code to support some very old web browsers is being removed. This could cause issues in those browsers. (T277803)
- A community consultation on the Arbitration Committee discretionary sanctions procedure is open until April 25.
Administrators' newsletter – May 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2021).
Interface administrator changes
- Following an RfC, consensus was found that third party appeals are allowed but discouraged.
- The 2021 Desysop Policy RfC was closed with no consensus. Consensus was found in a previous RfC for a community based desysop procedure, though the procedure proposed in the 2021 RfC did not gain consensus.
- The user group
oversight
will be renamed tosuppress
. This is for technical reasons. You can comment at T112147 if you have objections.
- The user group
- The community consultation on the Arbitration Committee discretionary sanctions procedure was closed, and an initial draft based on feedback from the now closed consultation is expected to be released in early June to early July for community review.
Administrators' newsletter – June 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2021).
Ashleyyoursmile • Less Unless
Husond • MattWade • MJCdetroit • Carioca • Vague Rant • Kingboyk • Thunderboltz • Gwen Gale • AniMate • SlimVirgin (deceased)
- Consensus was reached to deprecate Wikipedia:Editor assistance.
- Following a Request for Comment the Book namespace was deprecated.
- Wikimedia previously used the IRC network Freenode. However, due to changes over who controlled the network with reports of a forceful takeover by several ex-staff members, the Wikimedia IRC Group Contacts decided to move to the new Libera Chat network. It has been reported that Wikimedia related channels on Freenode have been forcibly taken over if they pointed members to Libera. There is a migration guide and Wikimedia discussions about this.
- After a Clarification request, the Arbitration Committee modified Remedy 5 of the Antisemitism in Poland case. This means sourcing expectations are a discretionary sanction instead of being present on all articles. It also details using the talk page or the Reliable Sources Noticeboard to discuss disputed sources.
Unprotection request
1 was put under pending changes 2 years ago for frequent vandalism, but there has been little since. I propose that this page be unprotected since it can be handled by regular counter-vandalism patrollers. Thanks in advance! (please ping on reply) Sennecaster (What now?) 05:47, 12 June 2021 (UTC)