User talk:SapientSquid: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 10:22, 1 July 2024

Welcome!

Hi SapientSquid! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! --Ipigott (talk) 11:25, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red

Hi there, SapientSquid, and welcome to Women in Red. You'll see in my welcome message above that there are a number of links to sites which provide guidance on Wikipedia editing. When you feel you are ready to create a biography, you should look through our Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 11:35, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ipigott, thank you for reaching out.

I've created a short biography of Álof árbót Haraldsdottir and am ready to submit it for publishing. I see this section in Women in Red's "Primer for creating women's biographies" page:

"The article is basically complete and you can move it to main space or ask an editor you trust to review it and move it to main space. It is not recommended that you submit drafts to Wikipedia:Articles for creation. If you do not have the ability to move an article, or have no relationship with an editor you trust, post a review request on the Women in Red Talk Page."

Do you recommend that I do this, and can you advise me how I can make the draft available to an individual editor rather than submitting it into the general pool?

Thank you. SapientSquid (talk) 12:16, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An editor will not see your message here unless your start it with their user name, {eg User:Jimfbleak for me) and sign it with four tildes ~~~~ when you post it. That will send an alert. You cannot in general pick your reviewer Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:59, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hallgerðr Höskuldsdóttir has been accepted

Hallgerðr Höskuldsdóttir, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tagishsimon (talk) 21:38, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

Welcome! Just a couple of minor comments. I see that you use ibid in your refs. While that's common in print, there is no "final version" on Wikipedia, and if another editor inserts an intervening ref, the ibid becomes confusing. Better to cite your text at the bottom and use the "author (year) page number(s)" format for the ref. Also note that page ranges should use an endash –, not a hyphen. Keep up the good work Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:55, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gyða Sveinsdóttir (November 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

If there is not any significant coverage, this can go on the page of Sweyn Forkbeard.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gyða Sveinsdóttir and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 14:53, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SapientSquid! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 14:53, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ingegerd Sverkersdotter has been accepted

Ingegerd Sverkersdotter, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

FeralOink (talk) 13:53, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red December 2023

Women in Red December 2023, Vol 9, Iss 12, Nos 251, 252, 290, 291, 292

Online events:

New: Alphabet run K & L | Women who died in 2023 | Honoured Women

Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman

Tip of the month:

Avoid copyright problems by rewriting in your own words. You can check
any article or draft with Earwig's copyvio detector.

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events.
Follow us on social media:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:24, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joan Washingby has been accepted

Joan Washingby, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 07:37, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Margaret Ogilvy, Lady Ogilvy

Hello, SapientSquid,

Thank you for creating Margaret Ogilvy, Lady Ogilvy.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Nice work.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Prodraxis}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

#prodraxis ^connect 18:51, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for creating an article for Mary Eaves, she sounds like she lead a very interesting life. :) Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 13:15, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Elizabeth Kemp (Q18528586)

Hello SapientSquid,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Elizabeth Kemp (Q18528586) for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want Elizabeth Kemp (Q18528586) to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

CoconutOctopus talk 16:37, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, SapientSquid. Thank you for your work on Catherine Lucy Kennedy. ARandomName123, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

I've marked this article as reviewed; thanks for your work! Happy holidays!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|ARandomName123}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 17:12, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red January 2024

Women in Red | January 2024, Volume 10, Issue 1, Numbers 291, 293, 294, 295, 296

Online events:

New: Education (year-long initiative) | Alphabet run M & N | Temperance women

Continuing: #1day1woman | Women who died in 2023

Announcement

In 2024 Women in Red also has a one biography a week challenge as part
of the #1day1woman initiative!

Tip of the month:

Check out the new navigation on our Women in Red Project home page.

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project.
Follow us on social media:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:18, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, SapientSquid. Thank you for your work on Bell Robertson. Skynxnex, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Skynxnex}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Skynxnex (talk) 15:11, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ethel Watts (Q93858085)

A tag has been placed on Ethel Watts (Q93858085), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer. (See section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – dudhhr^talk_contribs^she_her 19:15, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red February 2024

Women in Red | February 2024, Volume 10, Issue 2, Numbers 293, 294, 297, 298

Online events:

New: Alphabet run O & P | Black women

Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative)

Announcement

Please let other wikiprojects know about our February Black women event.

Tip of the month:

AllAfrica can now be searched on the ProQuest tab at the WP Library.

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project.
Follow us on social media:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:10, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

"Hilda Murray (Q18954256)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Hilda Murray (Q18954256) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 9 § Hilda Murray (Q18954256) until a consensus is reached. Deauthorized. ^(talk) 02:59, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red March 2024

Women in Red | March 2024, Volume 10, Issue 3, Numbers 293, 294, 299, 300, 301

Online events:

New: Alphabet run Q & R | Art+Feminism | Find Her

Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative)

Announcements

Celebrate Women – All content gender gap events, in every language Wikipedia, in March 2024
Francophone Women★ Writers Fortnight 2024
Feminism and Folklore 2024 Writing Contest

Tip of the month:

When creating a new article, check various spellings, including birth name, married names
and pseudonyms, to be sure an article doesn't already exist.

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project.
Follow us on social media:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:23, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks for starting the page for Martha Beatrice Webb (medical doctor); a very history describing the experience of female doctors at the start of the 20th century. It has prompted me to head down to my local library! Klbrain (talk) 20:45, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mary Douglas (Q18576719)

A tag has been placed on Mary Douglas (Q18576719), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer. (See section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:28, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Laura Lyttelton (Q18922097)

A tag has been placed on Laura Lyttelton (Q18922097), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer. (See section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:29, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Margaret Backhouse (Q18528920)

A tag has been placed on Margaret Backhouse (Q18528920), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer. (See section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:30, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Elizabeth Carey (Q75407887)

A tag has been placed on Elizabeth Carey (Q75407887), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer. (See section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:30, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Beatrice Webb (Q28043879)

A tag has been placed on Beatrice Webb (Q28043879), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer. (See section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:31, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red April 2024

Women in Red | April 2024, Volume 10, Issue 4, Numbers 293, 294, 302, 303, 304

Online events:

New: Alphabet run S & T | Gender studies | Health

Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative)

Announcements

The second round of "One biography a week" begins in April as part of #1day1woman.

Tip of the month:

If you run into technical problems, you might find help on our Tools and technical support page

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project.
Follow us on social media:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 19:43, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red #1woman1week January to March 2024

	#1woman1week
	Thank you, SapientSquid, for creating at least one biography of a woman per week from 1 January to 31 March 2024. I hope you will continue to participate from April to June.--Ipigott (talk) 06:54, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Gyða Sveinsdóttir

Hello, SapientSquid. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gyða Sveinsdóttir, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:05, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Biographies of English women

Hi there, SapientSquid. I've just been looking through your articles, reviewing and assessing those requiring attention. You have certainly been making many useful contributions. Keep up the good work. I see from the above messages that you have been trying to create articles with the Q reference from Wikidata. This often appears in redlists when the entry coincides with a name which already exists as a title of an article. When you create such articles, you should change the Q reference to something else, e.g. Jean Doe (painter).--Ipigott (talk) 07:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red May 2024

Women in Red | May 2024, Volume 10, Issue 5, Numbers 293, 294, 305, 306, 307

Online events:

New: Press women | Alphabet run U, V & W | Central and Eastern Europe

Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative)

Announcements from other communities

Wikimedia CEE Spring 2024 - contest with certificates of participation and prizes
The Wikipedia Library: #1Lib1Ref - May 15th to June 5th

Tip of the month:

Use open-access references wherever possible, but a paywalled reliable source
is better than none, particularly for biographies of living people.

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project.
Follow us on social media:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 06:18, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Margaret Hamilton, Lady Belhaven and Stenton

Hello, SapientSquid. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Margaret Hamilton, Lady Belhaven and Stenton, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:10, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rachael Cox-Davies

HI SapientSquid, I just wanted to thank you for writing the bio for Rachael Annie Cox-Davies . I have been undertaking searches on primary sources for her bio- so I will be adding some more details with sources (for example about her awards and nursing career) and a photo of her. I am part of the Nurses in Red WIKI group and just wanted you to know what I was building on your work. Thanks @Mavinhealthhistory Mavinhealthhistory (talk) 13:35, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mavinhealthhistory Excellent, I'm glad you've been able to find more details on her :) SapientSquid (talk) 17:19, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Coralie Glyn

Hello, SapientSquid,

Thank you for creating Coralie Glyn.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please use modern sources, sources from 1895 are obsolete. Ratnahastin (talk) 03:52, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ratnahastin}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

@Ratnahastin:Given that this is a biography of a person living in the 1890s, contemporary news articles from the 1890s are not obsolete. SapientSquid (talk) 11:29, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red June 2024

Women in Red | June 2024, Volume 10, Issue 6, Numbers 293, 294, 308, 309, 310

Online events:

New: LGBTQ+ women | Wiki Loves Pride | Women in Music | Alphabet run X, Y & Z

Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative)

Announcements from other communities

Women in Green Good Article Edit-a-thon June 2024 - Going Back in Time
The Wikipedia Library: #1Lib1Ref - May 15th to June 5th

Tip of the month:

Find a Grave is NOT a reliable source (as it is user-generated content). It can be used
to look for biographical clues.

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project.
Follow us on social media:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 07:06, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi SapientSquid. Thank you for your work on Emily Margaret Wood. Another editor, Rosiestep, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for writing this interesting biography.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Rosiestep}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Rosiestep (talk) 18:37, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red August 2024

Women in Red | July 2024, Volume 10, Issue 7, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 312, 313

Online events:

New: Translation contest 2024 | Science Fiction and Fantasy | Women in Sports

Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative)

Announcements from other communities

Wiki Loves Sport 2024 22 July - 22 September

Tip of the month:

A foreign language biography does not guarantee notability for English Wikipedia.
Check the guidelines before you start.

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project.
Follow us on social media:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 14:29, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red #1woman1week April to June 2024

	#1woman1week
	Thank you, SapientSquid, for creating at least one biography of a woman per week from 1 April to 30 June 2024 in addition to those created from January to March. I hope you will continue to participate from July to September.--Ipigott (talk) 10:22, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]