User talk:Sjö

This page has archives.

LDC and LLDCs article

Thanks for the change to the LDC article, please help to monitor the LLDC article, same user has been adding countries that are not on the UN list.Phd8511 (talk) 15:49, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

I added both LLDC and SIDS to my watchlist. Sjö (talk) 16:11, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you, for reverting vandalism off my talk page. Much appreciated! Avenue X at Cicero (talk) 11:56, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

My pleasure! :) Sjö (talk) 12:42, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Re Divorce law in lowercasessweden

You left a message on my page saying that I had done a copy and paste move and advising me of where to find info about moving pages. Not the case. I am an experienced editor who has been around for years and moved quite a number of pages. If you care to go to the talk page of that article, you will find a message from me, instructing the obviously very new and inexperienced editor on how to format headings. I don't know who did the cut and paste, but i presume it was the original editor. Amandajm (talk) 22:32, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Odd item on internet about Religious Slaughter

I found this [1] at auction. It is a copy of the response of the Board of Deputies of British Jews to a British Admiralty testing of RPSM (talk) 13:17, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Thank you, but I'm not interested. Why do you think I would be? Except for accepting your apology I haven't interacted with you since April 1st, and as far as I can see I haven't edited Shechita, sv:Skäktning or related articles for even longer than that. I prefer it that way for now, so please don't contact me again. I do not want to be involved in agonizing discussions with you again and I do not want to be called names by you again. Please, just let me be.Sjö (talk) 15:11, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

What names? I have never called you (or anyone else) names. I apologized for saying that I was not one of your subordinates (I paraphrase) because I felt that you and another editor, Wvs in chorus saying I had no right to edit was not correct. On the English WP I had been given encouragement by adminstrators there to go ahead and look for sources etc. But the language I used was too strong when I was told I had a political agenda and should remain silent, and I apologize for being impolite.

Someone trying to help me here is wondering how me criticizing a piece of legislation amounts to a personal insult. These are two separate theses: 1) The Swedish legislation on religious slaughter is racist. 2) Editor xyz is racist. I said 1): I did not say 2).

I am flummoxed and have no answer. I did not call anyone a racist or imply it or intend it.

Meanwhile, there are still a couple of edits I need to do on the Swedish articles Skäktning and Dagguereotype. I have been told to be a good boy here and after a while I should be let back on the Swedish WP. RPSM (talk) 09:13, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

I repeat, just let me be. Please don't contact me. We seem to have different views of what has been said, let's just leave it at that.Sjö (talk) 09:55, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Except for accepting your apology I haven't interacted with you since April 1st, and as far as I can see I haven't edited Shechita, sv:Skäktning or related articles for even longer than that. Correction [2] On the 8th April 2011 you were asking me for references in the Swedish article on Religous Slaughter. But as I am permanently blocked on the Swedish Wikipedia (I was told on your recommendation) I am unable to insert a reference into the article now, or ever. The place is marked "source required". Is it permissible for me to get a friend to do it?RPSM (talk) 09:44, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

I didn't realise until you began posting on my talk page how deeply I have been affected by the controversy on Swedish Wikipedia. For my peace of mind, I ask you again: please do not contact me. Please don't post here on my talk page or even email me. I have avoided contact with you because it upsets me very much, so please don't contact me, not even to answer this post.Sjö (talk) 16:21, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry

For the benefit of other editors here I want to say that I don't use sockpuppets. When I post as a logged in user, I never use any other name than Sjö. Just so there's no misunderstanding.Sjö (talk) 16:21, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Sjö. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Wikiquette_assistance.
Message added 02:33, 9 September 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Cerejota ^{If you reply, please place a {{talkback}} in my talk page if I do not reply soon.} 02:33, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

MegGriffin55

I've been here since Decmeber 8th last year! And I've editing the goldfish page since!--MegGriffin55 (talk) 20:55, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Good for you! I hope that you stay and contribute to the encyclopedia. This edit, however, didn't make the article any better, nor did this which I saw when I checked one of your earlier edits before I decided to put a warning on your talk page.Sjö (talk) 21:00, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Look, I was fixing it and I forgot about the steak thing still being there 'K? And "Good for you!"? You say literally would say to a five year old! --MegGriffin55 (talk) 03:29, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Did you follow the links above? When you replace a whole section with " golfish the only snack that smiles back" that is vandalism, nothing else and "steak" had nothing to do with it. IMO the warning was well deserved. I have edited since 2004 but if I pulled something like that I would be first warned and then blocked if I kept it up. I suggest you drop it and move on.Sjö (talk) 07:39, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

I was fixing that too by undoing it, but when I hit "save" I thought it was the commercial section (which I created just to let you know [nix that, I meant characters section]). Is that to much to ask from a girl who has problems with things?! --MegGriffin55 (talk) 18:14, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

I don't really understand what you're saying, but as long as you keep on making useful edits, you'll get no more complaints from me (and I see that most of your edits have indeed been useful).Sjö (talk) 10:13, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

(sighs)You're right, I'm sorry, I'm just always so tired and sensitve.--MegGriffin55 (talk) 15:15, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Hello you nazi piece of shit

Please be aware i made 1 edit and 2 reverts please learn to count, it takes 3 reverts to break 3rr now please fuck off and go back to your nazi policy enforcement and supporting of slave labor

you cunt94.168.204.89 (talk) 19:37, 9 October 2011 (UTC)