Jump to content

User talk:SomeBodyAnyBody05: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:SomeBodyAnyBody05/Archive 1) (bot
General note: Adding original research, including unpublished syntheses of sources on Ashleigh Aston Moore.
Line 43: Line 43:


Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#F5|section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --[[User:B-bot|B-bot]] ([[User talk:B-bot|talk]]) 13:56, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#F5|section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --[[User:B-bot|B-bot]] ([[User talk:B-bot|talk]]) 13:56, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

== June 2022 ==

[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] [[Help:Getting started|Welcome to Wikipedia]]. We appreciate [[Special:Contributions/SomeBodyAnyBody05|your contributions]], but in one of your recent edits&nbsp;to [[:Ashleigh Aston Moore]], it appears that you have added [[Wikipedia:No original research|original research]], which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses [[Wikipedia:No original research#Synthesis of published material that advances a position|combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say]]. Please be prepared to cite a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable source]] for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the [[Help:Introduction to referencing with Wiki Markup/1|tutorial on citing sources]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-nor1 --> [[User:PigeonChickenFish|PigeonChickenFish]] ([[User talk:PigeonChickenFish|talk]]) 19:11, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:11, 22 June 2022

"乔·拜登" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 乔·拜登. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 30#乔·拜登 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tavix (talk) 18:36, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

US president short descs

Hi, I am not hellbent on defending the changes I made to the presidents's short descriptions, but it didn't make much sense for you to only partially revert my changes. Now we have 30 biographies where the short description doesn't have an ordinal number and 10 where it does. I removed the numbers initially to get the descriptions to more closely comply with the length maximum and because it sounds strange (i.e. "the 20th president in 1881? There were 20 presidents in one year?!"). Will you continue to revert the rest, or should I change yours back? Thrakkx (talk) 18:55, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi thank you for contacting me first. I understand the point your but most readers will understand that this ordinal number is indicating which number president they were in office in order of the history of the United States. The short description I'm adding is also word for word the exact same phrase used in almost each president lede paragraph expect for James Garfield and William Henry Harrison like you mentioned. I think we should discuss a proper short description for those two specific articles but the others in my opinion seem adequate enough to include both facets of short description info. ₛₒₘₑBₒdyₐₙyBₒdy₀₅ (talk) 19:24, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Derek Chauvin mugshot April 2021.webp

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Derek Chauvin mugshot April 2021.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 13:56, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Ashleigh Aston Moore, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. PigeonChickenFish (talk) 19:11, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]