Jump to content

User talk:StreamingRadioGuide: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 55: Line 55:
:I was highlighting the "facts" that needed sources. Where in the FCC databases would you find out ratings information, who were the other powerhouses, the reasons why a station was sold? You were wrong to do that. Enjoy your little empire.
:I was highlighting the "facts" that needed sources. Where in the FCC databases would you find out ratings information, who were the other powerhouses, the reasons why a station was sold? You were wrong to do that. Enjoy your little empire.
::You can chill. The ratings are found in the Arbitron link (added to ever page) and the FCC databases has all the other information. Removing sections of text without need be is vandalism (hence the warning below). I don't have an "empire", but I have articles that have long met the standards of Wikipedia. - <small style="border:1px solid #990000;padding:1px;">[[User:Neutralhomer|<font style="color:#990000;background:#FFFFFF;">NeutralHomer</font>]] • [[User_talk:Neutralhomer|<font style="color:#000000;background:#FFFFFF;">Talk</font>]] • March 14, 2009 @ 00:32</small>
::You can chill. The ratings are found in the Arbitron link (added to ever page) and the FCC databases has all the other information. Removing sections of text without need be is vandalism (hence the warning below). I don't have an "empire", but I have articles that have long met the standards of Wikipedia. - <small style="border:1px solid #990000;padding:1px;">[[User:Neutralhomer|<font style="color:#990000;background:#FFFFFF;">NeutralHomer</font>]] • [[User_talk:Neutralhomer|<font style="color:#000000;background:#FFFFFF;">Talk</font>]] • March 14, 2009 @ 00:32</small>
:::"In May 2005, WAMM-AM went silent due to severe money problems,". You don't see any issue with declaring that a station had "severe money problems" without attributing it to a reliable source, and want to keep escalating this by reverting even the most defensible changes I make to any article? You're a moron. Report me.


== March 2009 ==
== March 2009 ==

Revision as of 06:16, 28 March 2009

Please refrain from movie radio station articles away from their proper FCC-licensed call signs, as you did with WZWP. JPG-GR 19:22, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WCMD

For some reason ABC Radio switched the main site to "timelessmusiconline.com" from the previous "timelessclassicsonline.com". If you see any other pages with messed up ABC Radio links, please let me know. Take Care...NeutralHomer T:C 03:05, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WCHV

Yeah, WCHV and the rest of the C-Ville Clear Channel cluster is now owned by Monticello Media. I expected them to update all their websites, so the rest of the Monticello Media cluster will probably be updated soon too. - NeutralHomer T:C 01:53, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WCVE

No challenge. That was added long ago, and was the only available information at the time. I had the stuff already in the can so to speak and thought it would enhance WP at that time. Better properly sourced content or even just removing it would be just fine with me. It was in good faith at the time, but we have grown. Thanks for writing to me first. Mark in Historic Triangle 21:54, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WJAW

OK, big rule...don't move the pages unless you know what you are doing. There is a WJAW (AM) and a WJAW-FM. You hastly made move, now requires an admin to bring back the AM page (which was knocked out when moved) and restore it to the WJAW (AM) page. If you need a page moved, please let me know and I will make sure this doesn't happen again. - NeutralHomer T:C 04:02, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WXXS

Good call on the unrelated webstreams on the WXXS page. I removed them (that could have had copyvio problems) and MASSIVELY updated that page...and by updated, I mean, got out a sickle and started slicing parts of that article away left and right (sheesh, there was alot of crap in that article). Anyway, good call there :) Take Care...NeutralHomer T:C 04:40, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Construction begins

This is such an important article in an area outside my area of knowledge, I'm reluctant to be bold. According to this article[1], construction of the replacement bridge has begun.StreamingRadioGuide 00:37, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it has. See St. Anthony Falls (35W) Bridge and contribute to it if you'd like to.--Appraiser 02:21, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WRNY (AM)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article WRNY (AM), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. Mr.Z-man 02:58, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of WRNY (AM)

WRNY (AM), an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that WRNY (AM) satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WRNY (AM) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of WRNY (AM) during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Mr.Z-man 05:45, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the rewrite. Much better now. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 03:14, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

KEBT

Really doesn't matter if it says station is "currently" owned by. If you don't like the word "currently" then need to rewrite KDFO and KBKO-FM, although, needs to say currently because owners for radio stations always changing. Don't rewrite for stations though, unless you know a little bit more "KEBT." Thanks.--JoeCool950 (talk) 06:50, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

radio logos

When updating articles with outdated logos (such as after a format change like WIFL (FM)), rather than just remove the image tag from the article, please move them to a gallery tag. This ensures that the images are not deleted and that they stay with the station article for historical purposes. It's also nice to put some comment about what prompted the logo switch, such as a format change. Thanks, --Rtphokie (talk) 19:53, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're entitled to your opinion.StreamingRadioGuide (talk) 12:48, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Feel like writing it? The disambiguation should be between "(Canada)" and "(United States)" according to WP:UNIGUIDE but I'll admit that I'm not sure if it really should be "United States" or "US". Honestly, I wouldn't object to using the province and state names instead of the country names, except that UNIGUIDE specifies use of the most general geographical disambiguation possible, which would be countries before states. Thoughts? I can start it if you're unwilling, I'll certainly chime in to make edits, so you won't be all on your own, but I thought you might want to be WP:BOLD about starting it since you discovered it :). Let me know. Cheers! --Aepoutre (talk) 16:40, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's outside of my area of interest. I was updating the entry for their student run radio station and noticed that if I added a link, it was pointing to the wrong school. It isnt' a matter of being bold, I don't have the time.StreamingRadioGuide (talk) 18:50, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! - JPG-GR (talk) 19:21, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You don't seriously think I don't know that, do you?StreamingRadioGuide (talk) 04:01, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WSVG

I have reverted your changes to the WSVG page. Littering a page with {{fact}} is completely unnecessary. References are produced, along with all other pages, at the bottom of the page with the FCC, Radio-Locator, and Arbitron links. - NeutralHomerTalk • March 13, 2009 @ 23:32

I was highlighting the "facts" that needed sources. Where in the FCC databases would you find out ratings information, who were the other powerhouses, the reasons why a station was sold? You were wrong to do that. Enjoy your little empire.
You can chill. The ratings are found in the Arbitron link (added to ever page) and the FCC databases has all the other information. Removing sections of text without need be is vandalism (hence the warning below). I don't have an "empire", but I have articles that have long met the standards of Wikipedia. - NeutralHomerTalk • March 14, 2009 @ 00:32
"In May 2005, WAMM-AM went silent due to severe money problems,". You don't see any issue with declaring that a station had "severe money problems" without attributing it to a reliable source, and want to keep escalating this by reverting even the most defensible changes I make to any article? You're a moron. Report me.

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to WSVG, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. NeutralHomerTalk • March 14, 2009 @ 00:29 00:29, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No Personal Attacks

If I see another person attack, like this one, you will be reported. While you are at it, please read WP:NPA. - NeutralHomerTalk • March 27, 2009 @ 00:16

Please report me.StreamingRadioGuide (talk) 03:39, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Do it again, and I will. - NeutralHomerTalk • March 27, 2009 @ 03:52
Both of you settle down. StreamingRadioGuide, you are better than that. Ease up on the personal stuff or at least keep it to each other's talk pages.--RadioFan (talk) 22:10, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]