User talk:ArielGold

Main Talk Userboxes Awards Archives Images Email Welcome!     Leave a new message! I will reply and drop a note on your talk page unless I know you'll check back here. Please be sure to sign your posts with ~~~~ so I know who you are! Quick Wikipedia Links: Wikipedia:Tutorial Wikipedia:Help desk Wikipedia:Cite your sources Wikipedia:Verifiability Wikipedia:Civility Wikipedia:Neutral point of view List of frequently misused English words Smiley list Ariel♥Gold - Registered Wikipedian since 2005 “ "Birds sing after a storm; why shouldn't people feel as free to delight in whatever sunlight remains to them? ” NASA Just wanted to thank you for your dedicated updating of the Space Shuttle mission pages. Czolgolz (talk) 17:42, 18 May 2009 (UTC) Hey, thanks! You too! I enjoy watching these missions so much, it is sad they don't get more mainstream television coverage! Ariel♥Gold 18:05, 18 May 2009 (UTC) Halt! Stop it immediately. Dude, stop deleting my message. The user reverted one of my edits here, and was not realizing it WAS constructive. So this user did something wrong. Toothy the beaver (talk) 04:59, 24 May 2009 (UTC) You are blanking another editor's talk page. You cannot simply archive someone else's talk page without permission. If they want it archived, they can do so, it is not your choice to do it without their permission. That editor has reverted your edits multiple times and you have been warned about archiving other people's talk pages. Please stop. If an editor reverted an edit of yours, it is not appropriate to "get revenge" by blanking their talk page. Ariel♥Gold 05:02, 24 May 2009 (UTC) STS-125 ground tracking Ooooops.... I forgot, so jazzed i found the pics, spaced it out. LanceBarber (talk) 15:41, 24 May 2009 (UTC) Hee hee, no biggie, I just didn't want them tagged! Ariel♥Gold 15:42, 24 May 2009 (UTC) done, lol !! LanceBarber (talk) 15:50, 24 May 2009 (UTC) Sweet, thanks! Ariel♥Gold 15:52, 24 May 2009 (UTC) wave vs. waive I won't quibble with you. My complaint wasn't with the word "waive" but with the phrase "waive off". That is, I think, a misuse of "waive" and that "wave" was better. Your reference, although it allowed the phrase, indicated it was influenced by "wave". If "waive off" is coming into use (I hadn't seen it before), I won't stand in the way of progress. The only injury to my pride was that you indicated that "wave off" was incorrect. It's not. Admittedly, the use of the phrase is more obvious on an aircraft carrier (http://usmilitary.about.com/od/glossarytermsw/g/w6770.htm), but any time an aircraft (or, in this case, a spacecraft) is ordered to "go around again" rather than landing, it has been figuratively, if not literally, waved off. Thanks for the comment, though. Paul D. Anderson (talk) 05:36, 25 May 2009 (UTC) Ping It regards what we discussed a few months ago. :) Enigmamsg 07:01, 5 June 2009 (UTC) Ding! Replied ;) Ariel♥Gold 07:36, 5 June 2009 (UTC)