User talk:Beatrizsborges

Future Film Festival moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Future Film Festival. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. – PharyngealImplosive7 (talk) 23:08, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Future Film Festival (January 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Future Film Festival and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:05, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Beatrizsborges! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:05, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Clergy of ancient Egypt moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Clergy of ancient Egypt. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because Article is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back.  // Timothy :: talk  23:55, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Crimes de la Commune

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Crimes de la Commune. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Crimes de la commune. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Crimes de la commune. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. ForsythiaJo (talk) 17:02, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

A belated welcome!

The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Beatrizsborges! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introductory tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The Teahouse

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! asilvering (talk) 23:27, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Beatrizsborges. Thank you for your work on Montchat. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:09, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Beatrizsborges. Thank you for your work on Agglomerate (Steel industry). SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:01, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Please don't add categories to talk pages

Please don't add content categories to talk pages, like you did for Talk:UraMin. Please add them to the actual page, not the talk page. Thanks! Keep up the hard work!! Mason (talk) 04:21, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Your translations from French

Hi there, Beatrizsborges, and thank you for all your translations from French. I've been looking through them, reviewing them and rating them as necessary. While they reflect the quality of the articles in French, the results are nevertheless impressive. Keep up the good work.--Ipigott (talk) 06:13, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saint-Charles shaft has been accepted

Saint-Charles shaft, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:11, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Beatrizsborges. Thank you for your work on Saint-Charles shaft. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:51, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rue de Lille (Paris) has been accepted

Rue de Lille (Paris), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nokia621 (talk) 23:24, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cokerie-lavoir du Chanois has been accepted

Cokerie-lavoir du Chanois, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ratnahastin (talk) 05:53, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the review! Beatrizsborges (talk) 18:20, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Beatrizsborges. Thank you for your work on Cokerie-lavoir du Chanois. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:55, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pauline (railcar) has been accepted

Pauline (railcar), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Trainsandotherthings (talk) 10:24, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ghent government in exile (Louis XVIII) has been accepted

Ghent government in exile (Louis XVIII), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Kiwiz1338 (talk) 07:16, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Ghent government in exile (Louis XVIII)

Hi, I have fixed multiple harv/sfn no-target errors in Ghent government in exile (Louis XVIII), but one remains. There is no work listed for "Emmanuel de Waresquiel et Benoît Yvert (1996)". If you could supply the missing source it would be appreciated. DuncanHill (talk) 09:04, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

It's OK, I found the last source, and fixed the error. DuncanHill (talk) 09:14, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Thank you! Beatrizsborges (talk) 13:52, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paul II Ardier has been accepted

Paul II Ardier, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ratnahastin (talk) 04:54, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Great Lillebonne mosaic has been accepted

Great Lillebonne mosaic, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 07:34, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Beatrizsborges. Thank you for your work on Great Lillebonne mosaic. Another editor, Aszx5000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Great job - watch out for WP:SANDWICH with images

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aszx5000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Aszx5000 (talk) 21:15, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prince Chaldean has been accepted

Prince Chaldean, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Waqar💬 19:16, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vostrus Stele has been accepted

Vostrus Stele, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ca ^{talk to me!} 11:09, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Neptune Triumph and the House of Sorothus mosaic has been accepted

Neptune Triumph and the House of Sorothus mosaic, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Stuartyeates (talk) 20:50, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carthage Circus Mosaic has been accepted

Carthage Circus Mosaic, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Twinkle1990 (talk) 08:53, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Organ of the Trocadéro Palace (June 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Garsh2 were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Organ of the Trocadéro Palace and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Garsh (talk) 00:32, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Hey, thank you so much for the message. I read and edited the article and hope to be better this time! Let me know if something is missing. I always glad to improve! Keep up with the good work. Beatrizsborges (talk) 17:59, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:French Pavilion has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:French Pavilion. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:26, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for that! I fixed the harvtxt errors, changed the title and added the disambiguation tag! Hope the new submission is acepted. Keep up with the good work. Beatrizsborges (talk) 18:02, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: French Pavilion of Versailles (June 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:French Pavilion of Versailles and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 20:02, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for that! I fixed the harvtxt errors, changed the title and added the disambiguation tag! Hope the new submission is acepted. Keep up with the good work. Beatrizsborges (talk) 18:02, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Organ of the Trocadéro Palace has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Organ of the Trocadéro Palace. Thanks! asilvering (talk) 21:02, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Capture of Lubumbashi has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Capture of Lubumbashi. Thanks! asilvering (talk) 21:36, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Hey, thank you for notifing me! I edited the article and I hope that is clear now! Keep up with the good work. Beatrizsborges (talk) 17:55, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Port of Boulogne-sur-Mer has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Port of Boulogne-sur-Mer. Thanks! asilvering (talk) 21:38, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for this comment! The Draft hasnt beenacepted yet but I improved the article. Hope that is better this time! Keep up with the good work. Beatrizsborges (talk) 18:46, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Guy II de Pontailler has been accepted

Guy II de Pontailler, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 00:28, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:French Freemasonry under the Second Republic has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:French Freemasonry under the Second Republic. Thanks! asilvering (talk) 20:52, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bagne has been accepted

Bagne, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 21:17, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

@Beatrizsborges Can you work on the article further to try addressing the tags as much as possible? 7804j (talk) 11:11, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Required translation attribution missing

I noticed that you added translation attribution to Draft talk:Port of Boulogne-sur-Mer in this edit, but that Talk page is not a translation, and does not require attribution. On the other hand, the draft page, Draft:Port of Boulogne-sur-Mer, is a translation from the French Wikipedia article, and does require attribution, but there is no such attribution in the page history. Same thing at Draft:Magny shaft, Draft:Ronchamp colliery shafts, Draft:Henri IV's white plume, and, I'm guessing, all of your translations. These four, and all articles you have translated previously require translation attribution in the Draft page history (or article history, if already moved to main space), and it must be added retroactively if you forgot to add it at the time, per Wikipedia's licensing requirements. Please see WP:RIA for how to proceed now. And thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia! Mathglot (talk) 08:33, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for letting me know! I fixed the errors! Some of the articles pointed by you were signed with the atrribuition already, so I double checked and added again just to be sure everything was right. Thanks for the message and keep up with good work. Beatrizsborges (talk) 17:56, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

False friends, and machine translation

Beatrizsborges, thanks for your creation of Draft:French Freemasonry under the Second Republic. I left you some comments in the Draft about over-reliance on machine translation, which produces such gems as:

The Supreme Council of France, the country's second-largest obedience and occasional rival of the main obedience, remained on the sidelines.

There's obviously a false friends or jargon problem here, and the solution isn't difficult to find. A bit of research on the French side, and then glancing at the English article on Freemasonry, and it soon becomes clear they are talking about a Grand Lodge (sometimes, just lodge). Please read over your translations, and don't just paste unedited machine translation into an article. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 10:16, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for this message this really helps me to improve my work! I edited the article and I saw the problem! I hope this time the article is more clear. Please let me know if something is missing or if there is something that I didn't notice. Thank you again and keep up with the good work.

have a nice week. Beatrizsborges (talk) 20:37, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ca' Morta tomb has been accepted

Ca' Morta tomb, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 19:27, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

When translation attribution is not needed

 Courtesy link: Special:Diff/1233391024

Beatrizsborges, thanks for your continuing use of translation attribution for your edits involving translation of copyrighted content from other Wikipedias. Just a note about overuse: the attribution statement only needs to be added to the edit summary when there is actual, "creative content" involved, i.e., something that is copyrightable. Not all content is copyrightable, even if it's long; for example, the list of the first million prime numbers or of all the streets in Paris has no creative content, and so is not copyrightable. What is and isn't "creative content" can get into tricky details of U.S. copyright law, and nobody expects a Wikipedia editor to know about that, so if you are not sure, adding a translation attribution statement to the edit summary never hurts. However, obvious things like fixing typos, wording adjustments, grammar fixes, copying citations over, or adding brackets to make something into a wikilink as you did in this edit, definitely are not "creative content", so you don't need to bother with it in the edit summary. If you have the slightest doubt about whether it is or isn't needed, just go ahead and add it. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 21:12, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for explaining to me! I added twice because I tought its was necessary since you left a message about the other articles. Thanks for clearing that. Beatrizsborges (talk) 21:21, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Please let me know if the article is suitable now. Thanks, Beatrizsborges (talk) 21:23, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Without commenting on the state of the article, the translation attribution for Draft:French Freemasonry under the Second Republic is still not adequate, because there is no attribution statement for any of the content prior to 20:31, 8 July 2024‎, i.e., for any of these 27 edits.

Your edits of 21:29, 27 May 2024 and 17:43, 28 May 2024 added about 17.3 kb and 2.2kb of text, respectively, to the article and you should retroactively add attribution for those at least. Follow the instructions at WP:RIA, referring specifically to those two edits. You could do it as a dummy edit all in single edit, with an edit summary like this:

[[WP:RIA|NOTE]]: Content in the edits of 21:29, 27 May 2024 and 17:43, 28 May 2024 was translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Franc-maçonnerie sous la Deuxième République]]; see its history for attribution.

In order to add that edit summary to the history, you will need to learn how to do a WP:DUMMY edit, which is basically adding or subtracting one space to the article. Hope this helps; ask if you have questions. Mathglot (talk) 22:37, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

Hey, let me know if it is okay now. I did just what you told me. Beatrizsborges (talk) 23:52, 10 July 2024 (UTC)