Jump to content

User talk:Cool Blue: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Re: Tax deductible theatre company
Line 115: Line 115:


Re [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gogo_Dodo&diff=120376913&oldid=119823877 your message]: There seems to be some independent coverage of this company, though it's very slim. The article is rather weak, but I suppose it's possible that it could be salvaged. I would recommend an AfD if you would like to pursue it further. -- [[User:Gogo Dodo|Gogo Dodo]] 01:42, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Re [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gogo_Dodo&diff=120376913&oldid=119823877 your message]: There seems to be some independent coverage of this company, though it's very slim. The article is rather weak, but I suppose it's possible that it could be salvaged. I would recommend an AfD if you would like to pursue it further. -- [[User:Gogo Dodo|Gogo Dodo]] 01:42, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

:Re [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gogo_Dodo&diff=120962492&oldid=120419916 your message]: I had hoped that the original author would have returned and addressed the points brought up, but it appears that they are not likely to return. There were a few outside sources that I found, but since the original author has failed to return to address them, I'm not particularly interested in trying to fix the article. It looks like it's going to get deleted, which is fine with me. Sorry about dragging out the process, but I was feeling particularly AGF that day and hoped the original author would return. -- [[User:Gogo Dodo|Gogo Dodo]] 03:56, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:56, 8 April 2007

Notice: This user has changed their username from Wikipedian27 to BlackBear, with regards to a new policy.

Question

Could this page be deleted? It has absolutely no content and has no information whatsoever. --SimonWhiteley 12:53, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cigarette Litigations

I appreciate your concern over an empty article which I have just created. It's not entirely empty as it is a work in progress. I think you were a little rash into tell me. Maybe I was too in creating this article. Nothing to worry, it will be filled out soon. Dat789 22:21, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

I did sign your post with four tildes. Dat789 22:51, 16 March 2007 (UTC) But I have noticed that it doesn't create a link surrounding my username and I have no idea why it does that. Dat789 22:51, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi, I noticed that you recently moved Jordanhill railway station to Jordanhill Railway Station without discussing it on the talk page first. I reversed it, because there hadn't been any previous discussion, and because the MOS says to prefer not capitalizing words in the title unless they are part of a proper name. If you think the article should be at Jordanhill Railway Station, please use the process at Wikipedia:Requested moves to discuss such a change beforehand. Thanks. Gavia immer (talk) 14:59, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warnings

When giving warnings, please don't do it over someone else's warnings. I reverted your warning postings here, could you re-post it? Sorry about that. - Penwhale | Blast the Penwhale 22:05, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Badagnani 00:48, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hey

How many lines do I have to fill, for my article to be accepted, I want to make as brief as possible, cuz my english isn't good for me to expand it. What's the minimal content? :-) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cold water (talkcontribs) 20:07, 26 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

I took the speedy tag off this article as the author amended it to assert notabililty. This is juts to let you know in case you want to take the article to afd. Cheers. --Spartaz Humbug! 20:34, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my Talk page so promptly. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 22:26, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ahhhh, if only I got offensive and aggressive messages just about my mistakes... but I know exactly what you mean. Nil desperandum. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 22:31, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Okay then

Okay, yes, I do want to keep it on Wikipedia where are these instructions on contesting deletion?--Runningcupcake03 00:08, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Contest

Thank You for doing that.--Runningcupcake03 00:12, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Administration

How would I get in contact with administration?

Thanks, again

Thanks, again!

Sure

Sure, what would i have to do?

Thanks

Thanks for all of your help with one of my first articles. I am very new neophyte to wikipedia and BlackBear has helped me. They not only should me the guidelines for articles and other things but also showed me different ways about wikipedia and other tips and trick to help improve wikipedia. They have just been a great help to me! Thanks! --Runningcupcake03 01:20, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One more question

I have one more question. Is it possible to promote my articles? Such as so it will appear on google search because right now it isnt, but when i search something else one of the first choices is wikipedia. Do you know if you can promote the article?--Runningcupcake03 01:38, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You RfA

I have added two questions to your RfA. They are optional, of course. Good luck, Gwernol 01:55, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your RfA

I'm sorry to tell you, but I just closed your request for adminship, as it didn't have a snowball's chance in hell of passing. Follow the advice from the comments left, continue editing in the areas you enjoy, get an editor review, and read through WP:GRFA to see what adminship is about. Keep up the good work! :) Majorly (o rly?) 10:46, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Patricia Gras

Huh? --Orange Mike 14:29, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation of the mixup. I try to keep my nose clean around here. --Orange Mike 15:19, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Soul dualism

Dear BlackBear,

Thank You for Your message which You left about the speedy deletion of the recently created Soul dualism article. My motivation for having created it can be read on the talk page of the article. Meanwhile, I have extended the article to reach the level of an {{anthropolgy-stub}}: added a lead text,write small example, added many refencesboth online and paper. If the “speedy deletion” template can be regarded as no more valid, how could I get it removed?

Thank You inadvance,

best wishes and much luck in Wikipedia work,

Physis 15:51, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FBI FAR

Hey BlackBear, I removed Federal Bureau of Investigation from the Featured Article Review. The FAR is for featured articles that might no longer meet the standards for a featured article. FBI isn't a featured article. If you still would like to get feedback, you could request a peer review, but before doing so, I'd suggest going over the feedback from an earlier peer review and the comments from the good article review (listed at the top of its talk page). Cheers, Bobanny 04:03, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

look at this page:

official single charts there, itsays, that say it right is number 1 in austria —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.114.201.91 (talk) 05:56, 29 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks

Just a quick note to say thanks for reverting the blank on my page. It's good to know that someone is watching out for those vandals. Many thanks. Eagle Owl 15:30, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mathematica

Hello, BlackBear!

Why did you undo my edit to Mathematica? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 129.177.44.11 (talk) 15:51, 1 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

If it was because of my incorrect usage of Enlgish, please help me to correct it.

Re: Tax deductible theatre company

Re your message: There seems to be some independent coverage of this company, though it's very slim. The article is rather weak, but I suppose it's possible that it could be salvaged. I would recommend an AfD if you would like to pursue it further. -- Gogo Dodo 01:42, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message: I had hoped that the original author would have returned and addressed the points brought up, but it appears that they are not likely to return. There were a few outside sources that I found, but since the original author has failed to return to address them, I'm not particularly interested in trying to fix the article. It looks like it's going to get deleted, which is fine with me. Sorry about dragging out the process, but I was feeling particularly AGF that day and hoped the original author would return. -- Gogo Dodo 03:56, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]