User talk:Brutonlegend

Welcome! Hello, Brutonlegend, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like The chronology of ezra 7, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Jarkeld (talk) 23:12, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Your contributed article, The chronology of ezra 7

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, The chronology of ezra 7. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - The Chronology of Ezra 7. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at The Chronology of Ezra 7 - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Jarkeld (talk) 23:12, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Your request for help

Hi, can you tell me why you requested help? Jarkeld (talk) 23:54, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Yes, and sorry for the delay. First, im new of course and im confused as to which page will be deleted if any. I made one article and realizing that the title was decapitalized I simply made another. I want the original deleted. Other than this, i was wondering if my article was in need of reference material being that it is pretty short and contains links to the respective individuals and terms.Brutonlegend (talk) 00:00, 11 April 2010 (UTC) {{helpme}}

• If you made an article and want it deleted (as in the case with the decapitalized article), you can place {{db-author}} on the page and an admin will delete it for you. In this instance after I nominated the article (the decapitalized one) for deleting as you made the second one, an admin declined the speedy and redirected the article to the correct one. As they stand neither will be deleted. Jarkeld (talk) 00:07, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
• The article does need reliable sources. It was tagged as such by another wikipedian. Jarkeld (talk) 00:10, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

{{helpme}} Thanks for the help..Ill go ahead and get rid of the one I don't want..One last thing. How long do I have to post those sources and make amends?Brutonlegend (talk) 00:15, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Plenty of time, don't worry about rushing.  fetchcomms☛ 00:19, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

(edit conflict)No fixed time period. But most of the time you will have some time to add sources. Jarkeld (talk) 00:20, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Chronology of Ezra 7

The article The Chronology of Ezra 7 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable book; no evidence it meets the inclusion standard WP:NBOOK.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Glenfarclas  (talk) 05:03, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Template:Do not delete Tim Song (talk) 09:04, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Brutonlegend (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello, I have made a page that is textually unbiased but is faulty only because it currently lacks enough reference material. I have been labeled a "sockpuppet," but for whom I am not currently aware. Also, I do not have multiple accounts but only one account. However, if I'm wrong, please relieve me from being blocked as I now understand the nature of this status and how to avoid it.Brutonlegend (talk) 17:35, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Hello, I have made a page that is textually unbiased but is faulty only because it currently lacks enough reference material. I have been labeled a "sockpuppet," but for whom I am not currently aware. Also, I do not have multiple accounts but only one account. However, if I'm wrong, please relieve me from being blocked as I now understand the nature of this status and how to avoid it.[[User:Brutonlegend|Brutonlegend]] ([[User talk:Brutonlegend#top|talk]]) 17:35, 17 April 2010 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hello, I have made a page that is textually unbiased but is faulty only because it currently lacks enough reference material. I have been labeled a "sockpuppet," but for whom I am not currently aware. Also, I do not have multiple accounts but only one account. However, if I'm wrong, please relieve me from being blocked as I now understand the nature of this status and how to avoid it.[[User:Brutonlegend|Brutonlegend]] ([[User talk:Brutonlegend#top|talk]]) 17:35, 17 April 2010 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hello, I have made a page that is textually unbiased but is faulty only because it currently lacks enough reference material. I have been labeled a "sockpuppet," but for whom I am not currently aware. Also, I do not have multiple accounts but only one account. However, if I'm wrong, please relieve me from being blocked as I now understand the nature of this status and how to avoid it.[[User:Brutonlegend|Brutonlegend]] ([[User talk:Brutonlegend#top|talk]]) 17:35, 17 April 2010 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Hi. If you look just above this help notice, you will see that I was blocked as a sockpuppet. Also, I have challenged the block and await a response. However, I cannot even achieve gathering and establishing sources for this article unless I am unblocked. Since theres no way to edit any page under this block status, I cannot even contest the deletion. Please note that the block states that I can remove the deletion if I, "object to deletion for any reason." I cannot do so in the places provided due to the block, which I have contested to be erroneous. Because of this inhibition, I respectfully request that the date of deletion be extended and/or that my block status be lifted.Brutonlegend (talk) 18:10, 17 April 2010 (UTC)