User talk:Chris Capoccia

Thank you for all of your help! I just have a couple of questions.

Hi Chris, I have been working on the Bioelectricity Wikipedia page with my colleagues and I really appreciate all the help that you have provided us in making the page more suitable for Wikipedia. We have put in citations in all the places that citations have been requested and also responded to the suggestion to merge with Biomagnetics (which we do not agree with and put our statement in the appropriate talk page a couple of weeks ago). I am wondering if you'd be willing to remove the two tags on the top of the page that indicate the need for the citations (which we have put in) and the suggestion for the merge (which we don't agree with and no one else has added to the conversation)? I really appreciate your help with our efforts to make the field of Bioelectricity more available for the general public to learn about and to hopefully enrich and inspire lives through learning.

Best wishes and many thanks,

Tiadeeharrison (talk) 15:55, 29 May 2018 (EST)

Thanks

Thanks Chris for all your great editing for wiki.

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

When it's one author

Hi, Chris Capoccia. I saw this[1]. So when it's one author, "last1" and "first1" should also be used? Or is this done for uniformity? I thought when it's just one author, "last" and "first" are the default. GBFEE (talk) 19:20, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

i'm not writing these entries by hand. for the book, using the Wikipedia:RefToolbar to fill in from the Google URL. For journal articles, mostly from DOI.  — Chris Capoccia 💬 13:54, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Got it. But then I guess that means the tools are starting off with "last1" and "first1." I'd alter it when it's one author. GBFEE (talk) 19:47, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

All the content was deleted

Hi Chris, I was working on editing Suresh Canagarajah's page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suresh_Canagarajah. And I've noticed that you removed all the content I uploaded. So, I was wondering if there's anything wrong with it and anything I need to do to prevent this.

Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by PSU-ASC (talk • contribs) 21:20, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

i don't know what you're talking about. it wasn't me. review the history of the page and you'll see it was someone else.  — Chris Capoccia 💬 13:53, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

For chapters

I added a citation, "Sex-Based Differences in Lung Physiology Physiology in Health and Disease", where I want it to focus on the chapter.[2]. Will you show me the appropriate way to do that. I feel I didn't do everything right. GBFEE (talk) 21:10, 11 January 2022 (UTC)