Jump to content

User talk:Chris Capoccia: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Tag: Reverted
Undid revision 990470809 by UserOshwash (talk)
Line 44: Line 44:
</table>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2020/Coordination/MMS/01&oldid=990307860 -->
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2020/Coordination/MMS/01&oldid=990307860 -->

{{uw-vandalism4im}} [[User:Oshwah|<b><span style="color:#C00000">~Oshwah~</span></b>]]<sup><small><b>[[User_talk:Oshwah|<span style="color:blue">(talk)</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Oshwah|<span style="color:green">(contribs)</span>]]</b></small></sup> 17:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:31, 24 November 2020

Thank you for all of your help! I just have a couple of questions.

Hi Chris, I have been working on the Bioelectricity Wikipedia page with my colleagues and I really appreciate all the help that you have provided us in making the page more suitable for Wikipedia. We have put in citations in all the places that citations have been requested and also responded to the suggestion to merge with Biomagnetics (which we do not agree with and put our statement in the appropriate talk page a couple of weeks ago). I am wondering if you'd be willing to remove the two tags on the top of the page that indicate the need for the citations (which we have put in) and the suggestion for the merge (which we don't agree with and no one else has added to the conversation)? I really appreciate your help with our efforts to make the field of Bioelectricity more available for the general public to learn about and to hopefully enrich and inspire lives through learning.

Best wishes and many thanks,

Tiadeeharrison (talk) 15:55, 29 May 2018 (EST)

Respected Sir, I have recently made some changes in the subject article. Kindly see and advice. RegardsRAJIVVASUDEV (talk) 13:38, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article really needs citations to support claims and not just rewording.  — Chris Capoccia 💬 13:48, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Citations were there. [[1]]. Thanks for your reply and the guidance.RAJIVVASUDEV (talk) 01:16, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
thank you for being on wikipedia and making it a better place. Firestar9990 (talk) 08:55, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have some queries

Firstly, I would like to thank you for taking time to go through my edits in the Cannabis in Brunei article. However, I do have some questions about your edits towards the in-text citations/endnotes and references. I am just a learner, so I appreciate all your help and would like to know why my sourcing were incorrect. Respectfully, what was your reason for removing the page numbers in the endnotes? Also, why did you change the citations to adjust the way the authors names are written (I cited the sources in Turabian Style)? –KatKucing (talk) 02:23, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

in my mind if a book chapter or a journal article is being cited with a page range, it is of limited value to split the citations into multiple citations just so the citation can precisely note a specific page. Additionally with the citation to the "misuse of drugs act", page numbers depend on formatting and don't make sense for the more accessible web page view. citation templates are much easier to manage and make sure they are correct because there are tools like citation bot and oa bot that will help with details and add parameters.  — Chris Capoccia 💬 12:34, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:15, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]