User talk:Chris Capoccia

Fish oil

Hi Chris. Would you please check when you are replacing links with dois or pmids that the links you are replacing are not to pdfs or the full text of the article. I always provide complete article links when I can locate them. In the fish oil article the effect of your edits was to replace five pdfs and three full article views with abstracts. It can be a lot of work sometimes tracking down complete articles, and it is disheartening to see the work wasted like this. --Epipelagic (talk) 00:25, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

WP:COPYLINK: "Linking to a page that illegally distributes someone else's work sheds a bad light on Wikipedia and its editors."  —Chris Capoccia ^T⁄_C 04:11, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

The links were generally legitimate. --Epipelagic (talk) 06:32, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Authors are often allowed to host their own papers on their own website and others are allowed to link to them. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 02:49, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Refs

I do not see the point of these edits thus reverted. [1] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 02:48, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Marriage and health

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Marriage and health you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Viriditas (talk) 03:05, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Note: I have notified the top contributors to marriage and health since the original nominator is no longer active. Feel free to participate in the process or just ignore/delete this message. Thanks. Viriditas (talk) 03:05, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Invitation join the new Physiology Wikiproject!

Physiology gives us an understanding of how and why things in the field of medicine happen. Together, let us jumpstart the project and get it going. Our energy is all it needs.

Based on the long felt gap for categorization and improvization of WP:MED articles relating to the field of physiology, the new WikiProject Physiology has been created. WikiProject Physiology is still in its infancy and needs your help. On behalf of a group of editors striving to improve the quality of physiology articles here on Wikipedia, I would like to invite you to come on board and participate in the betterment of physiology related articles. Help us to jumpstart this WikiProject.

• Feel free to leave us a message at any time on the WikiProkect Physiology talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
• You can tag the talk pages of relevant articles with {{WikiProject Physiology|class=|importance=}} with your assessment of the article class and importance alongwith. Please note that WP:Physiology, WP:Physio, WP:Phy can be used interchangeably.
• You will make a big difference to the quality of information by adding reliable sources. Sourcing physiology articles is essential and makes a big difference to the quality of articles. And, while you're at it, why not use a book to source information, which can source multiple articles at once!
• We try and use a standard way of arranging the content in each article. That layout is here. These headings let us have a standard way of presenting the information in anatomical articles, indicate what information may have been forgotten, and save angst when trying to decide how to organise an article. That said, this might not suit every article. If in doubt, be bold!
• Why not try and strive to create a good article! Physiology related articles are often small in scope, have available sources, and only a limited amount of research available that is readily presentable!
• Your contributions to the WikiProject page, related categories and templates is also welcome.
• To invite other editors to this WikiProject, copy and past this template (with the signature):
  • {{subst:WP Physiology–invite}} ~~~~
• To welcome editors of physiology articles, copy and past this template (with the signature):
  • {{subst:WP Physiology–welcome}} ~~~~
• You can feel free to contact us on the WikiProkect Physiology talk page if you have any problems, or wish to join us. You can also put your suggestions there and discuss the scope of participation.

Hoping for your cooperation! Diptanshu^Talk 12:18, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!

please help translate this message into the local language

	The Cure Award
	In 2013 you were one of the top 300 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you so much for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date medical information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do!

We are wondering about the educational background of our top medical editors. Would you please complete a quick 5-question survey? (please only fill this out if you received the award)

Thanks again :) --Ocaasi, Doc James and the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to William P. Didusch Center for Urologic History may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• exciting approaches in presenting urologic history, not only in the USA - a personal guided tour] |language=German |journal=Der Urologe |volume=50 |issue=4 |pages=483–8 |year=2011 |month=April |

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:28, 30 May 2014 (UTC)