User talk:Crusoe8181

marcnut1996

Apology accepted.

Marcnut1996 (talk) 10:10, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Untitled

Dear Drusoe, You are from Australia, Why are you editing Syrian Christian Page. What knowledge do you have of Syrian Christians in Kerala India? Amitvarghese (talk) 03:46, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

I AM ONLY GETTING TO IT, WHY ARE YOU DELETING HOURS OF HARD WORK. Amitvarghese (talk) 03:48, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Are you there, if you have no knowledge of what you you are deleting how can you justify your actions???Amitvarghese (talk) 03:58, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Because I am TRAILER PARK TRASH, YOU IDIOT, AND THAT IS THE WAY TRAILER PARK TRASH RESPONDS TO IDIOTS AND I AM ALSO THE WORLD'S GREATEST TRAILER PARK TRASH IDIOT (according to you) AND THE WAY THAT TRAILER PARK TRASH IDIOTS BEHAVE IS TO NOT EVEN ATTEMPT TO JUSTIFY THEIR ACTIONS, BUT SIMPLY TO WARN RESPECTABLE, INTELLIGENT, LITERATE, POLITE, COMPETETENT, SHIT-DOESN'T-SMELL EDITORS FROM A MUCH MORE RESPECTABLE FAMILY THAN MINE (LIKE YOUR GOOD SELF) TO KEEP AWAY FROM MY TALK PAGE. Kindest regards from the trailer park. Crusoe8181 (talk) 06:51, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Editors are free to edit any article on Wikipedia. --AussieLegend (✉) 06:42, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

You are a IDIOT

	TOP IDIOT
	World's TOP MOST IDIOT. Amitvarghese (talk) 04:01, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Why are insults almost invariably illiterate? Crusoe8181 (talk) 04:13, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

You still did not answer my question? What knowledge do you have to justify your actions. Notations were being added while you woke up from your Trailer park trash. Amitvarghese (talk) 04:16, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

While you woke up from your Trailer park trash. I do not understand this this term. Is it a compliment or is it a form of insult; is it a racist term or is it a sociological term??. On reflection, seems close to egregious illiteracy to me, but I may well be mistaken (barely awake and yet to shake off the trash). Regards Crusoe8181 (talk) 05:35, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

• Personal attacks are not appropriate anywhere on Wikipedia. Accordingly, I have warned Amitvarghese on his/her talk page. --AussieLegend (✉) 06:43, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

sheesh

you sure have a great fan club! i suspect they have no understanding of what egregious illiteracy means. the raft of postcode deletes - any way they could have been in one clump - scattered as they are - sure makes the following the issues a bit dispersed... sats 11:13, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

I know they can be combined but buggered if I could work out how (and working on a machine tonight with right click disabled doesn't help! - will have another look in the morning) Not sure how much support I will get on these but there was no way I was going to waste my time correcting the Victorian list with the latest change I became aware of. Cheers Crusoe8181 (talk) 11:25, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

I can relate to the attitude - hey more power to you mate - we always have our trusty afd freaks to help you along... sats 11:34, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

WP:BUNDLE explains how to nominate multiple pages for deletion. Essentially you just have to nominate one (let's say List of postcodes in Victoria (Australia)) and then add a list of the other pages with a reason. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of postcodes in Victoria (Australia) would then look like this:

List of postcodes in Victoria (Australia)

List of postcodes in Victoria (Australia) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

per WP:Directory. Australia Post maintains a correct list of postcodes. We have an incorrect list of no particular use with no added information and of no benefit to our readership, and we are providing possible incorrect info to those who come here thinking we are a directory. --Crusoe8181 (talk) 10:56, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

• I am nominating the following pages for the same reason:

List of postcodes in the Australian Capital Territory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

List of postcodes in New South Wales (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

List of postcodes in the Northern Territory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

List of postcodes in Queensland (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

List of postcodes in South Australia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

List of postcodes in Tasmania (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

List of postcodes in Western Australia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

--Crusoe8181 (talk) 10:56, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Then, at the top of each page nominated, place {{subst:afd1|List of postcodes in Victoria (Australia)}}, which points people to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of postcodes in Victoria (Australia), ie the first nomination page. I'm not sure what to do with the nominations that have already been created. --AussieLegend (✉) 12:45, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

1843 in Australia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Robert Johnstone

1844 in Australia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Henry Browne

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:01, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

redlink on dab page

You removed a redlink from dab page Darwin: I replaced it, with a bluelink to the page where it is mentioned, linked from, and there is some info about it. Redlinks are OK on dab pages as long as they have a bluelink as part of their entry. PamD 10:23, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Sir Cecil Bisshopp, 10th baronet

I have removed your PROD from this article, because it has already been de-PRODded. Once an article has been de-PRODded by anyone, even its creator, for any reason or none, it may not be PRODded again - see WP:DEL#Proposed deletion and WP:CONTESTED. The reason is that PROD is intended to save work at AfD for uncontroversial deletions, but if anyone removes a PROD, the deletion can no longer be considered uncontroversial. You will have to consider AfD. JohnCD (talk) 19:11, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

St Josephs

With regards to your edit of St Joseph's College, please note the correct and full title for that school is St. Joseph's College Melbourne without a comma. Although it is located in Melbourne and there may be more than one 'St Josephs College' in Victoria, it is not "of" Melbourne, so to speak. Yes, it is confusing.

Henry Sowerberry — Preceding unsigned comment added by Henry Sowerberry (talk • contribs) 00:13, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Sir Cecil Bisshopp, 10th Baronet for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sir Cecil Bisshopp, 10th Baronet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sir Cecil Bisshopp, 10th Baronet until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Kew and Bulleen Rd

Interested as to why you deleted my clarification to the reference to Bulleen Rd in the Kew branch railway article. In my view so few people understand the history of the road names that the way you have left the article is confusing in this respect.Lexysexy (talk) 00:16, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, the main problem was the dates, we use dd month year in Australia and I wasn't in the mood to change them all. Just revert my edit, and fix dates was the gist of my edit summary. regards Crusoe8181 (talk) 10:06, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi there!

Thought you might be interested to know I've opened a case about persistent harassment and controlling edit warring from you to various administrators. Have a lovely day! :-) 121.220.140.49 (talk) 13:11, 5 June 2013 (UTC)