User talk:Earth100

Home

Awards

Talk Page

Earth100's Archives
2012 Archive 2013 Arhive

Please click here to leave me a new message.

● Hello! Any comments, suggestions and request are Welcome!

● Any photo cropping, image Rotation, image flipping, photo adjustments, adding text photo captions...etc request are also welcome!

Join WikiProject Hong Kong

Visit WP:HK!

---

Regarding the images

If you are going to revert a image, please state a valid reason in the comment, not "Leave at it is." I asked you why you reverted the newer version in your commons talk page, and you replied with "Please stop adding lines into the images. The lines aren't even accurate, and is original research." The lines in the image are country borders from the NASA gallery version, and I don't see how it could be OR. You seem to have disregarded me and reverted back anyways with what I think might be a sockpuppet of yours. Instead of going back and reverting the image again, I have came here to tell you why so we can both avoid a 3RR. Also, is the User:kwlam259 a sockpuppet of yours? You seemed to have switched accounts in order to revert me, which also used the same edit summaries. According to [1], the edits from the two accounts seems to come in alternate intervals. Please take you time to read this prior to rashly reverting again. Thanks, - HurricaneSpin (Talk) 02:53, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

No, I have never, and will never sockpuppet.

It is for this reasons: 1. I have never thought about Sockpuppeting when i first signed up to Wikipedia. 2. I learned in the policies that it is against the law of Wikipedia. 3. It is a bad, uncivilized thing to do. 4. I would like to treasure my one and only account, and let other users be sure that this is my only account.

Thank you for your input. I now understand that your images are of no problem.--✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 05:16, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Good, now, will you please focus on your mentorship program? YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 05:26, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello? My account, and my choice. --✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 05:29, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

I am busy in real life, and now whatever time that I could use in Wikipedia isn't even going to the contributions.--✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 05:32, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

What exactly is this in reference to? I don't see any image reversions from Earth100's account with a "Leave at it is" edit summary--either here or on the Commons. Never mind; I found it. Inks.LWC (talk) 06:49, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

A bit of a hiccup, knowing that my talk page and contribution list page is being stalked by possibly tens of users.--✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 12:29, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

What does your talk page on Wikipedia being watched have anything to do with something you did on the Commons? Inks.LWC (talk) 21:55, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Reblock

It has just about been two weeks now since the last burst of activity on Earth's mentorship page and as a result I would like to suggest with a heavy heart that Earth100 gets blocked indefinitely for breaking his mentoring agreement and not participating in his mentorship programme. This is because Earth100 has expressed a wish to cancel his adoption and has only replied to the activity of a few weeks ago with a few dots. I would like to note that while Earth claims he is busy in real life he has managed to find the time over the last week to edit on 6 out of the last 7 days. This includes pretty time consuming process including uploading images on Commons and making a rude comment above after a gentle reminder about his mentorship page. I would suggest that if this proposal does go through and Earth wishes to be unblocked that he proves to us that he is serious about being mentored and becoming a better editor by doing a couple of exercises on his talk page. Jason Rees (talk) 19:30, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

When I first saw this, my initial though was hesitancy toward a re-block, since Earth100 hadn't done anything "wrong" (apart from the one mainspace edit without permission), but as I thought more about it, I realized that he doesn't really need to do something "wrong" to deserve a re-block; he just has to stop doing the "right" things. Being in a mentorship was part of the conditions for his unblock, and while technically he may be in a mentorship, he's effectively not anymore. He's not doing the work, and at this point, it's a waste of time for all involved and a waste of bandwidth on the site. It's been clear for a while that Earth100 does not care about actually changing. Sure, he's agreed to be in a "mentorship" (if we can even call it that anymore), but that was only when it was the only way he could get unblocked. Even then, he fought with the admins and those trying to help, insisting that he pick his own mentor when most of his choices were poor or didn't make sense. Now he's fighting to end his mentorship. I think it's time to just end this. Numerous users have gone out of their way to help him, and the return on the investment has been practically nothing. At this point, I don't see Earth100 as being a user that is reformable into a user who can actually contribute more than he harms the project. At this point, even if he finishes the mentorship, I don't think his heart is in it, and we're just going to end up back in the same spot weeks or months down the road. Inks.LWC (talk) 21:48, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

I suggested that things weren't going well on June 12 at User:Earth100/Mentorship. User:Hurricanehink, Earth's mentor, wanted to continue at that point. If you believe a reblock is warranted, you're going to have to get Hurricanehink involved in the discussion.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:28, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

JR asked Hink to comment. As for my opinion, I am mostly (but not 100%) convinced that a re-blocked is warranted, and on could argue he is lucky to not have been blocked at this point in time. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 23:38, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

::::I'm inclined to agree for all of the reasons stated. I'm busy as well, as it is the summer, and given Earth's reluctance to be a protege (mentee?) I'd like to end my duties as a mentor. That might simply matters. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 03:11, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

No, i will not accept a reblock, besides, do you wiki users don't know what is having a busy life? And i do not accept a reblock for this reasons:

• You should get blocked for doing something wrong, i did not.
• I have my freedom to use my time in wikipedia. However, i didn't got that freedom.
• In real sense, i'm actually already blocked now! I am not allowed to edit any Wikipedia articles! That's already terrible!

--✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 02:21, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

You broke your mentorship agreement. Part of your unblocking agreement was that you take part in a mentorship program, but you are not living up to such agreement. You might be able to edit if you follow Hink's instructions and take the mentorship seriously. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 02:43, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

If I may jump in here...If someone could explain to me what a mentorship entails, I may be willing to help out in Hink's stead. I have a generally open schedule that's quite flexible so could be of use on a more as-needed basis. Clearly Earth100 has a desire to be of use to Wikipedia and I feel it a waste to deny him that, especially given that it's a site dedicated to allowing anyone to edit. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 03:33, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Cyclone, it's kind of you to offer to assist, but the fault lies not with the mentor but with the mentee. Switching mentors under the circumstances here was not an option.--Bbb23 (talk) 04:37, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Essentially Earth100 has to be taught all of the basic rules of WP:OR, WP:V, WP:COPY, and WP:RS. If you want, I wouldn't object to you being his mentor, but you need to realize that he isn't choosing mentorship because he wants to change; he's choosing mentorship because it's his only way to get unblocked. He seems like he doesn't really want to change, and mentorship isn't going to help him if his heart isn't really in it. Inks.LWC (talk) 04:42, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

The problem is that you did do something wrong. In fact, you did MANY things wrong. And you ignored our advice to get a mentor until it was thrust upon you. And now you've stopped doing your mentorship. You claim that you're busy in real life, yet you've been editing the Commons fairly regularly. I suggested conditioning your unblock on not participating on Commons for that very reason. If you want to be unblocked, I think you need to actually focus on Wikipedia. You couldn't even pass lesson one and fix all of your grammatical mistakes. I'm also not convinced that your edit on the mainspace was an accident. I think you were testing what exactly you could get away with, and you ended up getting caught. If you were truly focused on your mentorship, you wouldn't be bothering with mainspace edits, and you wouldn't have made that "mistake". I don't think your heart is in this, and it's just a waste of everybody's time at this point. Inks.LWC (talk) 04:42, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

I am not opposed to CB mentoring him; however, per the agreements set a few months back, Earth can not be unblocked for six months. Am I correct? YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 04:48, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

So many editors with storms in their user names - who knew? :-) The simple answer to your question is yes. There's a more complex answer, but I don't think it's necessary for me to attempt to outline it at this juncture.--Bbb23 (talk) 04:56, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

June 2013

• Earth100, I have indefinitely blocked you again because you failed to live up to your unblock conditions. Your participation in your mentorship has been spotty and often disruptive. Your constant attempts to end your mentorship and edit Wikipedia have been misguided. Your complaints about not being able to edit Wikipedia even though you made almost no progress in your mentorship are a clear predictor that you cannot be trusted to edit here constructively.--Bbb23 (talk) 04:36, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Wait, how can you not trust me when i haven't even edited on a article?? That isn't fair!--✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 04:52, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

You have edited. And, have you been paying attention to what we've been advising you? You refuse to focus on your mentroship program, which was a vital agreement to your un-block. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 04:56, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Actually, he edited twice; the other edit was here. Both edits violated his unblock conditions.--Bbb23 (talk) 05:12, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

I thought he was able to edit the talk namespace. Let me find the unnlock conditions you documented. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 05:14, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Alright, I was wrong here. He broke his agreement twice. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 05:18, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Besides, i said that i was busy in real life. I didn't say i want to cancel the mentorship thing. I just too busy! And for that, i should get blocked????!!--✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 04:54, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

If you were busy, why were you playing on Commons and not focusing on your mentorship program? This hints you want to cancel your adaption. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 04:58, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

The next time you decide to block me a again, please wait for my reply! Are you wikipedians that nonsense??--✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 04:54, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Either behave, or I will revoke your talk page access.--Bbb23 (talk) 04:59, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

This is my account. Why should i be forced to do something that is supposed to be done by me, and even be warned to block my freedom of speech. --✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 05:02, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi Earth100! I'm a new user (I'm also Chinese living near Los Angeles :D). I want to let you know that shouting or any form of long strings of capital words (as you did above) is not permitted on any talk page, and talk page access could get revoked. Hope all is well! CaliforniaHurricane25 05:46, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Thank you CaliforniaHurricane25 for telling me that, i really appreciated it. --✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 05:51, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

WHY IS EVERYBODY CLAIMING something I didn't done!?

I did, not say I want to stop the mentorship. Can you guys understand how busy i am? And for the commons, I don't even have time for that! I only edit it when I have the time! Besides, I am NOT and have NO intention to waste anybody's time, and all you have to do, is to let me decide what to do, my account and my choice, except for doing bad things like vandalizing or posting OR.--✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 05:02, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

I am glad you have no interest in vandalizing; however, edited is a privalge not a right, And why does messing around Commons a higher priority than your mentorship? I'm sorry, but you have been wasting all of us time for almost a year now. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 05:08, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

That's not true; you did make an edit. And you aren't that busy in real life if you've got time to repeatedly ask to make edits on the mainspace and write on people's talk pages to talk about your Commons images. Furthermore, if you're really so busy, how do you have time to make so many uploads to the Commons? You claim that you haven't said you wanted to cancel your mentorship, but this pretty much shows that you have no interest in being mentored. You haven't even been able to understand how to properly use indentations on talk pages, even after I've repeatedly told you to do it. You're still not capitalizing "I". I could go on and on. Everything that you were supposed to have learned, you haven't. You continue to act innocent, yet your statements on here are full of half truths and manipulation. It's pointless. You're not learning, and I don't think that you ever will. You've never wanted to be in a mentorship. The only reason you were in one was because you were forced to to be unblocked, and even then you kept claiming that you were competent enough to make edits on your own when that is clearly not the case. Inks.LWC (talk) 05:03, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

I AM NOT MESSING AROUND at the commons. I didn't even had the time at commons, and I haven't upload much images in the few weeks. I was USING WHATEVER time that I HAVE to do it to the CONTRIBUTIONS! --✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 05:20, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

I didn't CONFIRM that I wanna be blocked and I want to cancel the mentorship. All I said was just to see how kind and how good are you guys are!--✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 05:27, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Besides, it's now NOT me who dosen't want to do the mentorship but it is NOW Bbb23, who is PREVENTING ME FROM DOING ANY MENTORSHIP progress!! Bbb23 blocked me, not to prevent me from destructively abusing Wikipedia but for bad intentions to "win win a user". I read somewhere in some polices months ago that a admin MUST block the user for good reasons, for example, preventing a user from vandalizing Wikipedia or destructively editing Wikipedia, not for stopping his mentorship progress. Besides, this could overall be a miscommunication. --✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 05:27, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Your behavior on here that last few weeks is almost like you wanna be blocked. And your behavior makes it like you want your talk page access revoked, which makes it extremely difficult to get unblocked. I support Bbb23's actions. The reason why you were blocked was because you were editing destructively and needed a mentor to help you. Your mentorship was part of the unblock agreement, and you refused to focus on it, spending the little time you have editing commons. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 05:32, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

As I said, I DIDN"T SAID I wanna be blocked, or I wanna cancel the adoption. Can you STOP STOP STOP saying i am .... .... ... or in simple words, BAD?!

Dear, Bbb23,

the next time you decide to block me, please LISTEN to the real USER you intend to block, not others, for example, example Inks, who is now saying I am bad, I am lying i will never learn, and well, overall, I now feel that I'm being said that I'm evil! --✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 05:36, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Besides, it's now NOT me who dosen't want to do the mentorship but it is NOW Bbb23, who is PREVENTING ME FROM DOING ANY MENTORSHIP progress!! Bbb23 blocked me, not to prevent me from destructively abusing Wikipedia but for bad intentions to "win win a user". I read somewhere in some polices months ago that a admin MUST block the user for good reasons, for example, preventing a user from vandalizing Wikipedia or destructively editing Wikipedia, not for stopping his mentorship progress. Besides, this could overall be a miscommunication.--✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 05:37, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

I said "is almost like you wanna be blocked", not that you want to be blocked. I believe you that you do not wanna get blocked, but Bbb23 is not trying to "win win a user". He knows what he is doing. There is a good reason for your block, you were not 3illing to learn and improved in your mentorship program and all you wanted to do is edit. I am not an administrator, but if your invil behavior continues, you we likely have your talk page access restricted (didn't I just say that :F) and thus making it even more difficult get unblocked. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 05:44, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

I want to continue the mentorship. I'm sorry if i made you feel that I didn't want to continue. Please unblock me so that whatever time that I have left, could be used to continue the mentorship. --✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 05:41, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

I'm putting in my words here and I am going to be straightforward. The people here have been real patient with you trying to teach you how to become a good editor. Seriously though, where is your dedication towards your mentorship while it was active? You are only now behaving and trying to win opinion because you were reblocked. You only seem to care about your mentorship once you have been blocked and made rash decisions while it was active. Saying what you just said two weeks or so back would have helped you. - HurricaneSpin (Talk) 05:54, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

I agree with what HS said. I have a question: why were you busy on Commons instead of focus on your menotorship program. If you can't focus on such program then, Still, Earth, I am not an administrator, so I don't want to comment on wheather you will get unblcoked and if so when. But if you get unblocked, you have to be willing to learn from whoever you mentor will be. I agree with CB earlier in that you are willing to do one thing: you want to edit. That is a good thing in theory, but as we've reahrshed many time, you really have to be willing to focus on the program. The more you focus on your mentorship, the better of an editor you will become, and the sooner you will be able to edit freely. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 06:23, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

My input was requested. One point first: I don't think that what Earth100 does or doesn't do on Commons should be even discussed here. If he chooses to use his time there, and not here, then fine. There's no rule that a person spend X amount of hours here, even when under mentorship.

That being said, Earth100, I don't understand how being unblocked would benefit you now. If you don't have time for the mentorship, that's fine. Why do you need to be unblocked if you're not doing anything? You will never be allowed to edit Wikipedia until you complete a serious, intense, long term mentorship. Well, at least, that's my opinion; technically you could ask for a block review at WP:BASC or via a new unblock request, or even ask us to open a discussion at WP:AN on your behalf, but my guess is the community is going to support the restrictions you were given. So, if you don't want to do the mentorship, then there's nothing here for you. There's two additional problems with you being unblocked: 1) you've twice "forgotten" that you're prohibited from editing outside of your mentorship page, and 2) being unable to edit but able to talk here actually seems to be making you more frustrated. So I guess what I'm asking is--why do you want to be unblocked? What purpose would it serve? If you're too busy to do the mentorship, then you don't need to be unblocked. If you think that the mentorship is unfair and is taking too long, then you don't need to be unblocked (because you must do the mentorship to be unblocked). So what I'm suggesting is that if you're too busy, you just go away for a while. Come back to Wikipedia when you have time to do the required work. We'll still be here. Qwyrxian (talk) 09:27, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Qwyrxian, I have already, in fact, gone away from wikipedia. And did you read what I said above, I wished to be unblocked to use whatever time I have to continue the mentorship progress. Now, it's not me who dosen't want to continue the mentorship, but it is the admins. I can't continue because I'm blocked.--✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 12:20, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

• *This* was not clever. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:05, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
  • There is a history of stuff like that happening when Earth100 has been blocked before, but every time it has happened in the past (and nothing exactly like this has ever happened), he's claimed that it was another poster who is trying to frame him by making it look like he is making sock accounts. Inks.LWC (talk) 18:09, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
    • I don't wanna attack anyone, and this is by no means personal, but I feel it is better to leek out the truth in this case than lie to him. Given his situation above, I think such wikistress thing is arguably babyish. I understand why he is doing this, it is so for people to realize that he is upset, and so that admins feel sorry for him, and unblock him. Even if Earth got unblcoked, he would not be able to continue editing in the mainspace, which by Earth's definition, means that he is blocked. And Earth, I have said it before, bout you continue to ignore me, so I will say it again. If you keep up the behavior on here, you are volunteering for your talk page access to be removed. Please do not blame the admins, I'm sorry to say this, but you did this to yourself. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 19:43, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

HOLY CRAP!!!! This Shocked me! I woke up today to see a Username named Earth200?!!!! Please, i have no intention of sockpuppeting, and i just want to continue my mentorship. --✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 02:32, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

• Enough with this. I've removed access to your talkpage. --Rschen7754 02:34, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

It turned out Earth200 is not a Earth100 sock, but a sock of IPhonehurricane95 (CaliforniaHurricane25) case. - HurricaneSpin (Talk) 01:10, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the link. I've posed a question to the CU at the SPI.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:27, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

• As the CU came up negative your access has been restored, but any further misbehavior and it will likely be removed again. -Rschen7754 15:53, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Thank You so much. As I always, say so, research before action.

Besides, when I say I didn't did it, it is the real truth. I felt so mad when I said that and my talk page got blocked. --✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 22:56, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Well, I'm glad to have filed in the SPI then. But Earth, you need to realize that you should stay calm. It wasn't a very bright idea for you to go to Commons and accuse others for the sock before the case is concluded. Don't make anymore rash decisions. Thanks, - HurricaneSpin (Talk) 23:06, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

A message from Earth100 to be read by: User:Hurricanehink, the person behind the account:UserEarth101, and admins.

That account was not made by me, and at that time, I was blocked, and I was also account creation blocked. Given that I have never thought of sockpuppeting, knowingly that it is forbidden, and the account creation was blocked, I would like my user page to return to it's original look. And besides that can someone remove the template that on User:Earth101 userpage that says This account is a sock puppet of Earth100 and has been blocked indefinitely. It is extremely annoying, especially for something I have never, never done.

And I would like to continue my mentorship. And for anyone who replies, please do not say that I would like to return to my mentorship only to get unblocked, as my only intention is to be a good user, and continue the mentorship. Besides, this current block was done because I have only said something like: I can stand this mentorship!!!, and something like: Can I cancel this mentorship?? Now, look at the above statements. All I did was to ask and say something, and for that, should a user get blocked for like...indefinitely??!!! And I never said that I want to cancel. It took confirmation for me to get unblocked and to enter the mentorship but should it take something without confirmation to get blocked?...indefinitely??!

Points for Admins to double think:

• Should a user get indefinitely blocked for not doing anything wrong, or action without confirmation??!
• I have know the rules and never thought of even doing sockpuppeting.

And for that, should I even be blocked and be accused of sockpuppeting?

• Should I get my talk page blocked indefinitely for only being a bit bold on expressing my views and freedom of speech?
• Overall, my whole time on Wikipedia was for only 1 reason, not for vandalizing, doing OR (I did it because I didn't know it was bad) or for sockpuppeting, and troubling other users, but for contributing and building a better Wikipedia. That was my only intention.
• Overall, as I always say, research before action.
• Bbb23 blanked my page without good "research before action", without my permission, and to me, it is a bit rude, and i would consider it pure 100% Vandalism. Can a top admin do this??!

Finally for anyone who wishes to kindly reply this message, please reply it with the understanding of the above statements. Thank you.--✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 11:49, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

---

In my opinion, you can do the mentorship while blocked. You just have to do it in sections on this talk page rather than on a subpage. Given that you're still weeks if not months away from editing mainspace directly, there's no need to be unblocked in order to continue the mentorship. I've removed the sock tag from User:Earth101, and left an explanatory note on that account's talk page. I've also restored your user page. Qwyrxian (talk) 12:31, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

You were blocked for several reasons including the addition of Original Research, Edit warring over pictures with Meow, Attacking other people and cultures and finally for not participating in your Mentorship programme. It is also worth noting that as things stand you do not have a mentor since Hurricanehink has decided to quit because you were taking too long over exercises etc. (see above).Jason Rees (talk) 12:51, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Thank You Qwyrxian!! You are clearly the most understand admin here!--✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 13:29, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Jason, that was history. It happened a long time ago and I didn't even got blocked weeks later. I was blocked because the admins thought I would like to cancel my adoption.--✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 13:29, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Jason, you are NOT Hink. How can you say he has cancel my adoption? Besides, can a adopter have patience? --✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 13:30, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

I know im not Hink but i can say he has cancelled your adoption, because he posted on this page last week - i have bolded his comment so that it stands out.Jason Rees (talk) 13:33, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, he clearly said, "I'd like to end my duties as a mentor." I don't understand how he could make it any clearer that he doesn't want to be your mentor, Earth100. Inks.LWC (talk) 16:20, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

So, Earth100, with no mentor, you're stuck. I can post a request on the Adopter page saying we're looking for a mentor, but no promises on when someone will decide to take up the cause. In fact, there's not even a guarantee that someone will ever do so; I know that a number of our mentors known for their work with difficult mentees (i.e., those being forced into adoption, rather than doing so voluntarily) are completely busy, either on or off wiki. If you wish me to make such a request, I will do so, and then you'll just have to wait. Qwyrxian (talk) 23:34, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

I would oppose looking for a new mentor. I might consider it after six months have elapsed and Earth100 making a more convincing case that there's some basis for us believing that he would take a mentorship more seriously, but not now. It's hard to imagine anyone more patient than Hink, so getting a new mentor would be a waste of the new mentor's time and our time. The problem here is not with the mentor.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:00, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

I think we should have him wait a while before he attempts to find a new mentor. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 00:11, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

I know that I am not an admin and I shouldn't be reading/commenting right now, but Earth, what is it that makes you want to edit Wikipedia so much? You have been extremely persistent about getting unblocked yet you stated that you are busy and cannot edit Wikipedia. - HurricaneSpin (Talk) 01:42, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

(Hurricane Spin, in accordance of what you typed, it clearly means that you did not read / understand my message. I might be busy, but that dosen't mean I can't spend a minute or two contributing wikipedia)

I suggest we wait for Hink's comments before drawing the next step. Can anyone alert Hink? --✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 02:29, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Sorry Earth, but the above is all true. You had little to no interest in mentoring, from the beginning when you were looking for anyone else to mentor you, to the end when you asked if you could get out of it. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:41, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

I agree with Hink. You really don't wanna be mentored. You have no patience and just want to edit. When mentored, you played around a commons and never did your assignments. This is not the admin's fault, it is your fault. You were the one who edit warred with Meow and moving images all around and added false stuff to articles, not the admins. I'm sorry to say this Earth, but you have nobody to blame but yourself. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 02:53, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

How dare you two say something and draw to a conclusion when you are not me.I said, that I want to be mentored and how can you ridiculously say that!! Besides, the desion for mentoring is in my hands. Not anyone else like Yellow Evan!--✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 05:29, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

None of what you say is true! You didn't even read what I said! Listen to me, not anyone else!--✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 05:31, 4 July 2013 (UTC)