User talk:Fortunatestars: Difference between revisions
→ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message: new section Tag: |
|||
(9 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 124: | Line 124: | ||
:Here is the [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Military_history_of_Asian_Americans&diff=829388078&oldid=828697704 diff] for the edit in question.--[[User:RightCowLeftCoast|RightCowLeftCoast]] ([[User talk:RightCowLeftCoast|talk]]) 01:59, 15 March 2018 (UTC) |
:Here is the [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Military_history_of_Asian_Americans&diff=829388078&oldid=828697704 diff] for the edit in question.--[[User:RightCowLeftCoast|RightCowLeftCoast]] ([[User talk:RightCowLeftCoast|talk]]) 01:59, 15 March 2018 (UTC) |
||
::I removed the link because it had nothing to do with Japanese American service in World War II. If there is, it should be mentioned in the text rather than a see also. [[User:Fortunatestars|Fortunatestars]] ([[User talk:Fortunatestars#top|talk]]) 04:49, 15 March 2018 (UTC) |
::I removed the link because it had nothing to do with Japanese American service in World War II. If there is, it should be mentioned in the text rather than a see also. [[User:Fortunatestars|Fortunatestars]] ([[User talk:Fortunatestars#top|talk]]) 04:49, 15 March 2018 (UTC) |
||
== ArbCom 2018 election voter message == |
|||
{{Ivmbox|Hello, Fortunatestars. Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2018|2018 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. |
|||
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. |
|||
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2018/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/710|voting page]]'''. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) |
|||
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/04&oldid=866998073 --> |
|||
== [[Southern Expansion Doctrine]] == |
|||
I have reverted your move. It is irrelevant what the Japanese common name is, this in '''''English''''' Wikipedia, and we use '''''English-language''''' [[WP:COMMONNAME]]s. If there is a better English-language common name, feel free to move it there, but do not move it back to the Japanese name, as it is completely inappropriate for this Wikipedia. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken|talk]]) 02:09, 24 December 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:That's NOT even the English name, no sources uses that name. I'm not even sure there ''is'' an English name. You need to get consensus and start a move discussion. [[User:Fortunatestars|Fortunatestars]] ([[User talk:Fortunatestars#top|talk]]) 04:32, 24 December 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== Thoughts on Inclusion of Commanders in Pacific War's infobox? == |
|||
[[File:Farm-Fresh eye.png|15px|link=|alt=]] You are invited to join the discussion at [[Talk:Pacific_War#Infobox_(March_2019)]].[[User:Emiya1980|Emiya1980]] |
|||
== No original research? == |
|||
Hi. Regarding this edit (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Manzanar&diff=next&oldid=922580102), you left a tag referring to [[WP:NOR]]. What does that mean? Are you saying that the person who did the previous edit (me) did some original research somehow? What I was trying to do was to provide a better internal link for the reader. Thanks for responding. Your friend, [[User:BeenAroundAWhile|BeenAroundAWhile]] ([[User talk:BeenAroundAWhile|talk]]) 02:38, 24 October 2019 (UTC) |
|||
:Apologies for the late reply BeenAroundAWhile, but what I meant was you can't assume what the quote meant without it specifically stating so in the source. So the hyperlink to "Japanese people" was the safest bet. [[User:Fortunatestars|Fortunatestars]] ([[User talk:Fortunatestars#top|talk]]) 10:14, 1 December 2019 (UTC) |
|||
== ArbCom 2019 election voter message == |
|||
<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;"> |
|||
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2019|2019 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019#Election_timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. |
|||
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. |
|||
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2019/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC) |
|||
</td></tr> |
|||
</table> |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019/Coordination/MMS/06&oldid=926750430 --> |
|||
== ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message == |
|||
<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;"> |
|||
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2020|2020 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2020#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. |
|||
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. |
|||
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2020/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 02:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC) |
|||
</td></tr> |
|||
</table> |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2020/Coordination/MMS/06&oldid=990308429 --> |
|||
== ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message == |
|||
<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;"> |
|||
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2021|2021 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2021#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. |
|||
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. |
|||
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2021/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small> |
|||
</td></tr> |
|||
</table> |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2021/Coordination/MM/06&oldid=1056563377 --> |
Latest revision as of 00:46, 23 November 2021
Welcome!
|
Disambiguation link notification for January 1
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Japanese festivals, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sakai River. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Fortunatestars. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
February 2017
[edit] Hello, I'm ThePlatypusofDoom. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Niihau incident— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 23:20, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Fortunatestars. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
MOS:NOTSEEALSO
[edit]That doesn't really what you want it to say, at least not categorically: it is a "general rule" but worse, "Thoughts and prayers" is in the article but it's piped, and I actually don't agree with that piping, which pretty much renders it invisible. Besides, there's MOS:LWQ, which advises us not to use wiklinks in quotations in the first place. Drmies (talk) 04:04, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
- I don't think the "Thoughts and prayers" article seem like a notable enough article to be included in the "See also" of the Douglas High School shooting in the first place. It's a little trivial. I suggest taking it up on the article's talk page. Fortunatestars (talk) 04:52, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
- That was not my point but thanks for the advice. Drmies (talk) 15:59, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
March 2018
[edit] Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit to Military history of Asian Americans does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
I see in the edit without an edit summary a link to Anti-Japanese sentiment in the United States#World War II was removed. Why?--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 01:58, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
- Here is the diff for the edit in question.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 01:59, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
- I removed the link because it had nothing to do with Japanese American service in World War II. If there is, it should be mentioned in the text rather than a see also. Fortunatestars (talk) 04:49, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Fortunatestars. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
I have reverted your move. It is irrelevant what the Japanese common name is, this in English Wikipedia, and we use English-language WP:COMMONNAMEs. If there is a better English-language common name, feel free to move it there, but do not move it back to the Japanese name, as it is completely inappropriate for this Wikipedia. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:09, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
- That's NOT even the English name, no sources uses that name. I'm not even sure there is an English name. You need to get consensus and start a move discussion. Fortunatestars (talk) 04:32, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Thoughts on Inclusion of Commanders in Pacific War's infobox?
[edit] You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Pacific_War#Infobox_(March_2019).Emiya1980
No original research?
[edit]Hi. Regarding this edit (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Manzanar&diff=next&oldid=922580102), you left a tag referring to WP:NOR. What does that mean? Are you saying that the person who did the previous edit (me) did some original research somehow? What I was trying to do was to provide a better internal link for the reader. Thanks for responding. Your friend, BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 02:38, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
- Apologies for the late reply BeenAroundAWhile, but what I meant was you can't assume what the quote meant without it specifically stating so in the source. So the hyperlink to "Japanese people" was the safest bet. Fortunatestars (talk) 10:14, 1 December 2019 (UTC)