User talk:Hauskalainen

You might have missed it, but I did explain it on the talk page.

You might have missed it, but I did explain it on the talk pageHere

My rational is that although your comments on English Bill of Rights 1689 are very interesting, I believe that they do not belong in the English history section of the 2nd Amendment article. I believe that only point here is what influence the English Bill of Rights had at the time of the drafting of the 2nd A. Anything that occurred after 1792 is not relevant in my opinion. I respect your input and knowledge and certainly do not want to get into an editing war, so I ask you to please review the TALK page and reconsider your position. Your points could be inserted elsewhere in the article or in another article comparing British & American gun law. Anyway, I wish you well and hope that you do not find my view too dogmatic. I apologize if any of my comments upset you. Grahamboat (talk) 04:32, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

death panels

hello. i was wondering if you noticed/liked the organization the page had[1] prior to the IP putting "rationing" under use. i liked it. thanks. Jesanj (talk) 15:26, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

i have to thank you for adding wilensky to the article. i had known for a while she deserved mention (and i think i even mentioned that at DYK) but i never got around to it. thank you. =) Jesanj (talk) 16:31, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Article probation

Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed, Death panel, is on article probation. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at Talk:Sarah Palin/Article probation. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.

The above is a templated message. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you. -- Kelly ^hi! 19:08, 3 January 2011 (UTC)