User talk:Hipocrite: Difference between revisions
→neutral RfC notification: new section |
Weedwacker (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Ivmbox |
|||
|'''Please read this notification carefully:'''<br>A [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive265#Proposed Gamergate solution by Hasteur|community discussion]] has authorised the use of [[Wikipedia:General sanctions|general sanctions]] for pages related to the [[Gamergate controversy]].<br>The details of these sanctions are described [[Wikipedia:General sanctions/Gamergate|here]]. |
|||
[[Wikipedia:General sanctions|General sanctions]] is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means [[WP:INVOLVED|uninvolved]] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], our [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standards of behaviour]], or relevant [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as [[Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Types of restrictions|editing restrictions]], [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Types of bans|bans]], or [[WP:Blocking policy|blocks]]. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged [[Wikipedia:General sanctions/Gamergate#Log of notifications|here]]. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. |
|||
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date. |
|||
| Commons-emblem-notice.svg |
|||
| icon size = 50px}} |
|||
==sorry== |
==sorry== |
||
Apologies Hipocrite. I mistook you for yet another mansplainer!--[[User:Atlantictire|Atlantictire]] ([[User talk:Atlantictire|talk]]) 00:12, 3 July 2014 (UTC) |
Apologies Hipocrite. I mistook you for yet another mansplainer!--[[User:Atlantictire|Atlantictire]] ([[User talk:Atlantictire|talk]]) 00:12, 3 July 2014 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 00:13, 19 December 2014
Please read this notification carefully:
A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Gamergate controversy.
The details of these sanctions are described here.
General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.
sorry
Apologies Hipocrite. I mistook you for yet another mansplainer!--Atlantictire (talk) 00:12, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
neutral RfC notification
Template_talk:Succession_box#RfC has a discussion on succession box usage. You had previously noted or opined at Template_talk:Infobox_officeholder/Archive_18#RfC_on_successor.2Fpredecessor_where_a_district_is_not_reasonably_viewed_as_the_same_after_redistricting thanks. Collect (talk) 21:28, 27 November 2014 (UTC)