User talk:HueMan1: Difference between revisions
FireflyBot (talk | contribs) m (BOT) Notification of potential CSD G13 nomination of Draft:No-contact apprehension policy Tag: Reverted |
→Lionheartv an unreliable source: new section |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. [[User:FireflyBot|FireflyBot]] ([[User talk:FireflyBot|talk]]) 13:01, 30 January 2023 (UTC) |
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. [[User:FireflyBot|FireflyBot]] ([[User talk:FireflyBot|talk]]) 13:01, 30 January 2023 (UTC) |
||
== Lionheartv an unreliable source == |
|||
I should have asked you this before LOL. How come Lionheartv is an unreliable source? Their posted sources are true. Please read the entire about page of the website. [[User:SeanJ 2007|SeanJ 2007]] ([[User talk:SeanJ 2007|talk]]) 00:14, 6 February 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:14, 6 February 2023
This page has archives. Sections older than 3 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Concern regarding Draft:No-contact apprehension policy
Hello, HueMan1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:No-contact apprehension policy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Lionheartv an unreliable source
I should have asked you this before LOL. How come Lionheartv is an unreliable source? Their posted sources are true. Please read the entire about page of the website. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 00:14, 6 February 2023 (UTC)