User talk:Jfhutson

Category:Pages with links to the Bibleversefinder tool

Hello, Jfhutson,

I saw that you recently created this category and marked it as a "tracking category". If you anticipate that it will remain empty, could you add a {{emptycat}} tag to it? Otherwise, it is subject to deletion as a CSD C1 empty category. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:33, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Pages with links to the Bibleversefinder tool

A tag has been placed on Category:Pages with links to the Bibleversefinder tool requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:09, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Pages with links to the Bibleversefinder tool

A tag has been placed on Category:Pages with links to the Bibleversefinder tool requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:27, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

Psalms

Sorry about reverting you on the article, - but can we find a better lead image than one suggesting a Baroque painting? We are fighting Christing bias, DYK. (I am Christian, but still.) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:24, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

@Gerda Arendt: what image do you suggest? The current Hebrew text in the infobox isn't even Psalms, and I think something showing David has more value than words practically no one can read. Davidic authorship is a shared belief between Jews and Christians so I don't see the bias issue. But if you have an idea that's less "biased" go ahead and make the edit. --Jfhutson (talk) 12:53, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

I am travelling, so have no time to even look. Feel to just revert me if you don't know something closer. You can refer to this thread. I was in a rush, sorry. How about a search for a good lead image on the article talk? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:15, 27 September 2019 (UTC)