Jump to content

User talk:KJP1: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Yrarendar (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:
Hey there! I was just wondering why you had created the page [[KJP1/sandbox2]]. Did you mean to created it in your userspace? If so, I'd be happy to move it, as long as you tell me what to move it to. Considering you've made 25,000 edits and have pending changes reviewer, new pages reviewer, autopatrolled, extended confirmed, and rollbacker rights, you probably know that sandboxes should not be in the mainspace. However, there could easily be some exception that I don't know about - if so, sorry about this message. Thanks!--[[User:SkyGazer 512|SkyGazer 512]] <sup><span style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:100%;color:black;background-color:aqua;;">[[User talk:SkyGazer 512|talk]]</span> / <span style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:100%;color:black;background-color:yellow;;">[[Special:Contributions/SkyGazer 512|contributions]]</span> / [[Special:PrefixIndex/User:SkyGazer 512/|subpages]]</sup> 17:07, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
Hey there! I was just wondering why you had created the page [[KJP1/sandbox2]]. Did you mean to created it in your userspace? If so, I'd be happy to move it, as long as you tell me what to move it to. Considering you've made 25,000 edits and have pending changes reviewer, new pages reviewer, autopatrolled, extended confirmed, and rollbacker rights, you probably know that sandboxes should not be in the mainspace. However, there could easily be some exception that I don't know about - if so, sorry about this message. Thanks!--[[User:SkyGazer 512|SkyGazer 512]] <sup><span style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:100%;color:black;background-color:aqua;;">[[User talk:SkyGazer 512|talk]]</span> / <span style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:100%;color:black;background-color:yellow;;">[[Special:Contributions/SkyGazer 512|contributions]]</span> / [[Special:PrefixIndex/User:SkyGazer 512/|subpages]]</sup> 17:07, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
:{{U|SkyGazer 512}} - aarrrrgggghhhhh! No, I'm a techno-idiot and I meant to put it as a second sandbox, as I don't want to delete the content of the one I have. Hugely grateful if you were able to make it a subset of my sandbox. [[User:KJP1|KJP1]] ([[User talk:KJP1#top|talk]]) 17:27, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
:{{U|SkyGazer 512}} - aarrrrgggghhhhh! No, I'm a techno-idiot and I meant to put it as a second sandbox, as I don't want to delete the content of the one I have. Hugely grateful if you were able to make it a subset of my sandbox. [[User:KJP1|KJP1]] ([[User talk:KJP1#top|talk]]) 17:27, 1 April 2018 (UTC)


::I'm sorry, could you clarify what you mean by a subset? For now (temporary) I just moved it to [[User:KJP1/sandbox3]] just so new page patrollers don't get confused (I hope that's okay).--[[User:SkyGazer 512|SkyGazer 512]] <sup><span style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:100%;color:black;background-color:aqua;;">[[User talk:SkyGazer 512|talk]]</span> / <span style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:100%;color:black;background-color:yellow;;">[[Special:Contributions/SkyGazer 512|contributions]]</span> / [[Special:PrefixIndex/User:SkyGazer 512/|subpages]]</sup> 17:32, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
::I'm sorry, could you clarify what you mean by a subset? For now (temporary) I just moved it to [[User:KJP1/sandbox3]] just so new page patrollers don't get confused (I hope that's okay).--[[User:SkyGazer 512|SkyGazer 512]] <sup><span style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:100%;color:black;background-color:aqua;;">[[User talk:SkyGazer 512|talk]]</span> / <span style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:100%;color:black;background-color:yellow;;">[[Special:Contributions/SkyGazer 512|contributions]]</span> / [[Special:PrefixIndex/User:SkyGazer 512/|subpages]]</sup> 17:32, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
:::Absolutely fine, and many thanks. I was experimenting to try to give myself a second sandbox, but I obviously didn't get it quite right. Thanks again. [[User:KJP1|KJP1]] ([[User talk:KJP1#top|talk]]) 17:36, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
:::Absolutely fine, and many thanks. I was experimenting to try to give myself a second sandbox, but I obviously didn't get it quite right. Thanks again. [[User:KJP1|KJP1]] ([[User talk:KJP1#top|talk]]) 17:36, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
Line 27: Line 29:
[[User:Yrarendar|Yrarendar]] ([[User talk:Yrarendar|talk]]) 10:21, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
[[User:Yrarendar|Yrarendar]] ([[User talk:Yrarendar|talk]]) 10:21, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
:{{U|Yrarendar}} - Appreciate that. I thought you might be able to help. I think some of the problems around sourcing are similar for French journals and New Zealand authors. Give me a shout if I can do anything. Happy to review Trafic as and when. [[User:KJP1|KJP1]] ([[User talk:KJP1#top|talk]]) 11:02, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
:{{U|Yrarendar}} - Appreciate that. I thought you might be able to help. I think some of the problems around sourcing are similar for French journals and New Zealand authors. Give me a shout if I can do anything. Happy to review Trafic as and when. [[User:KJP1|KJP1]] ([[User talk:KJP1#top|talk]]) 11:02, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

== Brannavan Gnanalingam ==

I have done quite a bit of work on the entry about Brannavan Gnanalingam. I hope that this is what you have in mind; I also hope that the original author will not be offended. This author should receive credit for highlighting such an interesting young talent (for a novelist, under 40 is young). I do very much understand the frustration of that original author's experience. I actually am not certain how to write to the original contributor because there is no user page attached to the signature. I have kept everything that was originally included but moved it around a bit to impart a sense of flow. I added quite a few references, including a list of the author's novels. BG definitely seems someone worth watching, very talented if somewhat controversial and uneven. I will get back to the ''Trafic'' entry at the end of the week - so that at some point there will be a live link from the "Raymond Bellour" entry. Again thank you for your continued support.
[[User:Yrarendar|Yrarendar]] ([[User talk:Yrarendar|talk]]) 05:09, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:09, 4 April 2018

Archive box..... that way →

All done. When you want to archive in the future, go to the search bar and type in "User talk:KJP1/Archive 3". Open up another screen, this time of your talk page. You should now have two screens open: "User talk: KJP1/Archive 3" and your talk page. Go back to the "User talk:KJP1/Archive 3" screen and you'll see a red link for an article of that name. Click it open and go back to your talk page and copy and paste all threads you want to archive on your current talk page into "User talk: KJP1/Archive 3". Hit save and add the name - "User talk: KJP1/Archive 3" to the archive box in the edit screen of your talk page. Failing that, give me a shout and I'll happily do it for you. CassiantoTalk 15:30, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Very much appreciated. KJP1 (talk) 16:55, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! I was just wondering why you had created the page KJP1/sandbox2. Did you mean to created it in your userspace? If so, I'd be happy to move it, as long as you tell me what to move it to. Considering you've made 25,000 edits and have pending changes reviewer, new pages reviewer, autopatrolled, extended confirmed, and rollbacker rights, you probably know that sandboxes should not be in the mainspace. However, there could easily be some exception that I don't know about - if so, sorry about this message. Thanks!--SkyGazer 512 talk / contributions / subpages 17:07, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SkyGazer 512 - aarrrrgggghhhhh! No, I'm a techno-idiot and I meant to put it as a second sandbox, as I don't want to delete the content of the one I have. Hugely grateful if you were able to make it a subset of my sandbox. KJP1 (talk) 17:27, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


I'm sorry, could you clarify what you mean by a subset? For now (temporary) I just moved it to User:KJP1/sandbox3 just so new page patrollers don't get confused (I hope that's okay).--SkyGazer 512 talk / contributions / subpages 17:32, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutely fine, and many thanks. I was experimenting to try to give myself a second sandbox, but I obviously didn't get it quite right. Thanks again. KJP1 (talk) 17:36, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No problem at all, I'm glad I could help. I make the dumbest mistakes ALL the time when editing wikis - we've all been there! Regards, --SkyGazer 512 talk / contributions / subpages 17:44, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft

Hey, thanks for reviewing Draft:The Neon Wilderness on its first day. The banner saying it'd take 8 weeks was pretty disheartening. Thanks again, 62.147.24.218 (talk) 02:49, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Brannavan Gnanalingam

I will try to add a few more citations. He isn't well known but looks promising. He has reviews in well-respected outlets. Many thanks for your encouragement. I think I know what to do for the Trafic entry, but it will take a little time. Your assistance has proven invaluable. Yrarendar (talk) 10:21, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yrarendar - Appreciate that. I thought you might be able to help. I think some of the problems around sourcing are similar for French journals and New Zealand authors. Give me a shout if I can do anything. Happy to review Trafic as and when. KJP1 (talk) 11:02, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Brannavan Gnanalingam

I have done quite a bit of work on the entry about Brannavan Gnanalingam. I hope that this is what you have in mind; I also hope that the original author will not be offended. This author should receive credit for highlighting such an interesting young talent (for a novelist, under 40 is young). I do very much understand the frustration of that original author's experience. I actually am not certain how to write to the original contributor because there is no user page attached to the signature. I have kept everything that was originally included but moved it around a bit to impart a sense of flow. I added quite a few references, including a list of the author's novels. BG definitely seems someone worth watching, very talented if somewhat controversial and uneven. I will get back to the Trafic entry at the end of the week - so that at some point there will be a live link from the "Raymond Bellour" entry. Again thank you for your continued support. Yrarendar (talk) 05:09, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]