Jump to content

Physical schema: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Removed the 3rd short paragraph, it wasn't really useful/related, had no citations (couldn't find any reliable ones either) and looked a lot like someones opinion.
Line 4: Line 4:


{{As of | 2012}} seven main databases dominate the commercial marketplace: [[Informix Dynamic Server|Informix]], [[Oracle Database|Oracle]], [[PostgreSQL|Postgres]], [[Microsoft SQL Server|SQL Server]], [[Sybase]], [[IBM DB2|DB2]] and [[MySQL]]. Other RDBMS systems tend either to be legacy databases or used within academia such as universities or further education colleges. Physical data models for each implementation would differ significantly, not least due to underlying [[operating system | operating-system]] requirements that may sit underneath them. For example: SQL Server runs only on [[Microsoft Windows]] operating-systems, while Oracle and MySQL can run on Solaris, Linux and other UNIX-based operating-systems as well as on Windows. This means that the disk requirements, security requirements and many other aspects of a physical data model will be influenced by the RDBMS that a [[database administrator]] (or an organization) chooses to use.
{{As of | 2012}} seven main databases dominate the commercial marketplace: [[Informix Dynamic Server|Informix]], [[Oracle Database|Oracle]], [[PostgreSQL|Postgres]], [[Microsoft SQL Server|SQL Server]], [[Sybase]], [[IBM DB2|DB2]] and [[MySQL]]. Other RDBMS systems tend either to be legacy databases or used within academia such as universities or further education colleges. Physical data models for each implementation would differ significantly, not least due to underlying [[operating system | operating-system]] requirements that may sit underneath them. For example: SQL Server runs only on [[Microsoft Windows]] operating-systems, while Oracle and MySQL can run on Solaris, Linux and other UNIX-based operating-systems as well as on Windows. This means that the disk requirements, security requirements and many other aspects of a physical data model will be influenced by the RDBMS that a [[database administrator]] (or an organization) chooses to use.

Whilst there is increasing debate surrounding which [[RDBMS]] performs better within various environments, it was{{when?|date=January 2012}} generally accepted{{By whom|date=December 2009}} that Oracle's architecture is best suited to enterprise and larger implementations, SQL Server better for [[Small and medium enterprises | SMEs]], and MySQL adequate for SMEs and small businesses. A resource for such debate (which contains case studies) can be found at the IT QUEST<ref>IT QUEST</ref> web site.{{cn|date=January 2012}}


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 14:01, 10 June 2012

Physical Data Model Options.[1]

A physical data model (or database design) is a representation of a data design which takes into account the facilities and constraints of a given database management system. In the lifecycle of a project it typically derives from a logical data model, though it may be reverse-engineered from a given database implementation. A complete physical data model will include all the database artifacts required to create relationships between tables or to achieve performance goals, such as indexes, constraint definitions, linking tables, partitioned tables or clusters. Analysts can usually use a physical data model to calculate storage estimates; it may include specific storage allocation details for a given database system.

As of 2012 seven main databases dominate the commercial marketplace: Informix, Oracle, Postgres, SQL Server, Sybase, DB2 and MySQL. Other RDBMS systems tend either to be legacy databases or used within academia such as universities or further education colleges. Physical data models for each implementation would differ significantly, not least due to underlying operating-system requirements that may sit underneath them. For example: SQL Server runs only on Microsoft Windows operating-systems, while Oracle and MySQL can run on Solaris, Linux and other UNIX-based operating-systems as well as on Windows. This means that the disk requirements, security requirements and many other aspects of a physical data model will be influenced by the RDBMS that a database administrator (or an organization) chooses to use.

References

  1. ^ FEA Consolidated Reference Model Document. whitehouse.gov May 2005. p.91.