Jump to content

Retrocession Day: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 33: Line 33:


==Controversy==
==Controversy==
* [[Taiwanese people|Taiwanese]] historian {{illm|Jim Lee (Taiwanese historian)|zh|李筱峰|lt=Jim Lee}} claims the following: After [[World War II]] ended, officials of the [[Republic of China (1912–1949)|Republic of China]] traveled to Taiwan to accept the surrender of [[Japanese Tenth Area Army|Japanese forces]] on behalf of the [[Allies of World War II|Allies]]. Although they claimed that it was "Taiwan Retrocession", it was actually a provisional [[military occupation]] and was not a transfer of territories of Taiwan and Penghu. A transfer of territory requires a conclusion of an international [[treaty]] in order to be valid. But before the government of the Republic of China was able to conclude a treaty with Japan, it was overthrown by the [[Chinese Communist party]] and fled [[mainland China|its territory]]. Consequently, that attributed to the controversy of the "[[Theory of the Undetermined Status of Taiwan|Undetermined Status of Taiwan]]" and the controversy over "Taiwan Retrocession".<ref>{{cite news | author = 邱燕玲 | url=http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/focus/paper/40263 |title=李筱峰︰台灣光復 中國無權慶祝 | newspaper = [[Liberty Times]] | location = [[Taipei]] |date= 26 October 2005|access-date = 22 August 2015 |language = zh}}</ref>
* [[Taiwanese people|Taiwanese]] historian {{illm|Jim Lee (Taiwanese historian)|zh|李筱峰|lt=Jim Lee}} claims the following: After [[World War II]] ended, officials of the [[Republic of China (1912–1949)|Republic of China]] traveled to Taiwan to accept the surrender of [[Japanese Tenth Area Army|Japanese forces]] on behalf of the [[Allies of World War II|Allies]]. Although they claimed that it was "Taiwan Retrocession", it was actually a provisional [[military occupation]] and was not a transfer of territories of Taiwan and Penghu. A transfer of territory requires a conclusion of an international [[treaty]] in order to be valid. But before the government of the Republic of China was able to conclude a treaty with Japan, it was overthrown by the [[Chinese Communist party]] and fled [[mainland China|its territory]]. Consequently, that contributed to the controversy of the "[[Theory of the Undetermined Status of Taiwan|Undetermined Status of Taiwan]]" and the controversy over "Taiwan Retrocession".<ref>{{cite news | author = 邱燕玲 | url=http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/focus/paper/40263 |title=李筱峰︰台灣光復 中國無權慶祝 | newspaper = [[Liberty Times]] | location = [[Taipei]] |date= 26 October 2005|access-date = 22 August 2015 |language = zh}}</ref>
* The official position of both the [[People's Republic of China]] and the [[Republic of China]] is that Taiwan and Penghu were returned to the Republic of China according to the terms of the 1945 Japanese Instrument of Surrender, which stipulated Japan's compliance with the terms of the [[Potsdam Declaration]]. The Potsdam Declaration in turn included the terms of the Cairo Declaration, which required Japan to return all conquered territories to China, including Taiwan and the [[Pescadores]].<ref>{{cite news |last=Hung |first=Joe |url=http://www.chinapost.com.tw/commentary/the-china-post/joe-hung/2009/09/28/226452/p2/Chen%27s-shadow.htm |title=Chen's shadow is getting eclipsed |newspaper=China Post |date=7 Dec 2009}}</ref>
* The official position of both the [[People's Republic of China]] and the [[Republic of China]] is that Taiwan and Penghu were returned to the Republic of China according to the terms of the 1945 Japanese Instrument of Surrender, which stipulated Japan's compliance with the terms of the [[Potsdam Declaration]]. The Potsdam Declaration in turn included the terms of the Cairo Declaration, which required Japan to return all conquered territories to China, including Taiwan and the [[Pescadores]].<ref>{{cite news |last=Hung |first=Joe |url=http://www.chinapost.com.tw/commentary/the-china-post/joe-hung/2009/09/28/226452/p2/Chen%27s-shadow.htm |title=Chen's shadow is getting eclipsed |newspaper=China Post |date=7 Dec 2009}}</ref>
* The [[Democratic Progressive Party]], which rejects the idea of Taiwan being taken back by China, downplayed the event during their two presidencies.<ref>{{cite news |last=Chung |first=Lawrence |date=26 Oct 2000 |newspaper=The Straits Times |url=http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/55/562.html |title=Taipei govt downplays Retrocession Day}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Hirsch |first=Max |date=26 Oct 2006 |url=http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2006/10/26/2003333432 |newspaper=Taipei Times |title=Activists call for Retrocession Day national vacation |page=2}}</ref>
* The [[Democratic Progressive Party]], which rejects the idea of Taiwan being taken back by China, downplayed the event during their two presidencies.<ref>{{cite news |last=Chung |first=Lawrence |date=26 Oct 2000 |newspaper=The Straits Times |url=http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/55/562.html |title=Taipei govt downplays Retrocession Day}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Hirsch |first=Max |date=26 Oct 2006 |url=http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2006/10/26/2003333432 |newspaper=Taipei Times |title=Activists call for Retrocession Day national vacation |page=2}}</ref>

Revision as of 07:07, 27 August 2021

Retrocession Day
Observed byRepublic of China
TypeHistorical, cultural, nationalist
Date25 October 1945
Frequencyannual
Retrocession Day
Traditional Chinese臺灣光復節
Simplified Chinese台湾光复节
Transcriptions
Standard Mandarin
Hanyu PinyinTáiwān guāngfùjié
Hakka
RomanizationThòi-vân kông fu̍k chiet

Retrocession Day is the name given to the annual observance and unofficial holiday and former public holiday in Taiwan to commemorate the end of Japanese rule of Taiwan and Penghu, and the claimed retrocession ("return") of Taiwan to the Republic of China on October 25, 1945.[1][2] However, the idea of "Taiwan retrocession" is in dispute.

Historical background

Chief Executive of Taiwan Province Chen I (right) accepting the receipt of Order No. 1 signed by Rikichi Andō (left), the last Japanese Governor-General of Taiwan, on behalf of the Republic of China Armed Forces at Taipei City Hall.

Taiwan, then more commonly known to the Western world as "Formosa", became a colony of the Empire of Japan when the Qing Empire lost the First Sino-Japanese War in 1894 and ceded the island with the signing of the 1895 Treaty of Shimonoseki. Japanese rule in Taiwan lasted until the end of World War II.

In November 1943, Chiang Kai-shek took part in the Cairo Conference with Franklin D. Roosevelt and Winston Churchill, who firmly advocated that Japan be required to return all of the territory it had annexed into its empire, including Taiwan and the Penghu (Pescadores) Islands. Article 8 of the Potsdam Proclamation, drafted by the United States, United Kingdom, Soviet Union and China in July 1945, reiterated that the provisions of the Cairo Declaration be thoroughly carried out, and the Japanese Instrument of Surrender stated Japan's agreement to the terms of the Potsdam Proclamation.

Under the authorization of American General Douglas MacArthur's General Order No. 1, Chen I (Chief Executive of Taiwan Province) was escorted by George Kerr to Taiwan to accept the Japanese government's surrender as the Chinese delegate. When the Japanese surrendered at the end of World War II, General Rikichi Andō, governor-general of Taiwan and commander-in-chief of all Japanese forces on the island, signed an instrument of surrender and handed it over to governor-general of Taiwan Chen I, representing the Republic of China Armed Forces to complete the official turnover in Taipei (known during occupation as Taihoku) on October 25, 1945, at Taipei City Hall (now Zhongshan Hall). Chen Yi proclaimed that day to be "Retrocession Day" and organized the island into the Taiwan Province of the Republic of China. Taiwan has since been governed by the Government of the Republic of China.

Controversy

  • Taiwanese historian Jim Lee [zh] claims the following: After World War II ended, officials of the Republic of China traveled to Taiwan to accept the surrender of Japanese forces on behalf of the Allies. Although they claimed that it was "Taiwan Retrocession", it was actually a provisional military occupation and was not a transfer of territories of Taiwan and Penghu. A transfer of territory requires a conclusion of an international treaty in order to be valid. But before the government of the Republic of China was able to conclude a treaty with Japan, it was overthrown by the Chinese Communist party and fled its territory. Consequently, that contributed to the controversy of the "Undetermined Status of Taiwan" and the controversy over "Taiwan Retrocession".[3]
  • The official position of both the People's Republic of China and the Republic of China is that Taiwan and Penghu were returned to the Republic of China according to the terms of the 1945 Japanese Instrument of Surrender, which stipulated Japan's compliance with the terms of the Potsdam Declaration. The Potsdam Declaration in turn included the terms of the Cairo Declaration, which required Japan to return all conquered territories to China, including Taiwan and the Pescadores.[4]
  • The Democratic Progressive Party, which rejects the idea of Taiwan being taken back by China, downplayed the event during their two presidencies.[5][6]
  • Because the Republic of China officials who accepted the surrenders of Japanese Forces in 1945 were all representatives of the Allies of World War II,[7] there are opinions that Japanese Forces on Taiwan actually surrendered to the Allies, not to the Republic of China, and therefore the so-called "Taiwan Retrocession Day" is merely "Surrenders of Japanese Forces to the Allies Day", which marked the beginning of military occupation and was not a retrocession. The opinions further believe that "Taiwan Retrocession" is a misleading term.[8][9][10][11]
  • Writing in the American Journal of International Law in July 2000, Jonathan I. Charney and J. R. V. Prescott maintained that the Chinese Nationalists (ROC) began a military occupation of Taiwan in 1945 as a result of Japan's surrender,[12] and that none of the post-World War II peace treaties explicitly ceded sovereignty over Formosa and the Pescadores to any specific state or government.[13]
  • As late as November 1950, the United States State Department announced that no formal act restoring sovereignty over Formosa and the Pescadores to China had yet occurred;[14] British officials reiterated this viewpoint in 1955, saying that "The Chinese Nationalists began a military occupation of Formosa and the Pescadores in 1945. However, these areas were under Japanese sovereignty until 1952."[15]

Taiwan independence viewpoint

Supporters of Taiwan independence have argued that Taiwanese retrocession was invalid since there is no precedent in international law in which an instrument of surrender effected a transfer of sovereignty, and they base their belief in part on both a declassified CIA report from March 1949 confirming that Taiwan was not a part of the Republic of China[16] and President Truman's 27 June 1950, statement regarding Taiwan's "undetermined status", which they hold as proof of the leading Allies' views. In a lengthy legal essay published in Tokyo in 1972, Chairman Ng Chiau-tong, World United Formosans for Independence, analyzed the British Parliamentary records and other documents before concluding that the legal status of Taiwan was undetermined.[17]

See also

References

  1. ^ "Taiwan's retrocession procedurally clear: Ma". The China Post. CNA. 26 Oct 2010. Archived from the original on 2015-09-24. Retrieved 2014-05-28.
  2. ^ Huang, Tai-lin (22 May 2014). "Lien's campaign TV ads to stress love for Taiwan". Taipei Times. p. 3. Retrieved 2014-05-28.
  3. ^ 邱燕玲 (26 October 2005). "李筱峰︰台灣光復 中國無權慶祝". Liberty Times (in Chinese). Taipei. Retrieved 22 August 2015.
  4. ^ Hung, Joe (7 Dec 2009). "Chen's shadow is getting eclipsed". China Post.
  5. ^ Chung, Lawrence (26 Oct 2000). "Taipei govt downplays Retrocession Day". The Straits Times.
  6. ^ Hirsch, Max (26 Oct 2006). "Activists call for Retrocession Day national vacation". Taipei Times. p. 2.
  7. ^ Joint Chiefs of Staff (1945). General Order No. 1  – via Wikisource. The above indicated commanders are the only representatives of the Allied Powers empowered to accept surrenders and all surrenders of Japanese Forces shall be made only to them or to their representatives.
  8. ^ 陳逸南 (July 28, 2011). "受降非光復". Liberty Times (in Chinese). Taipei. Retrieved September 10, 2015.
  9. ^ 黃聖峰 (September 9, 2015). "台灣光復從未發生". Apple Daily (in Chinese). Taipei. Retrieved September 10, 2015.
  10. ^ "釐清歷史脈絡方知「光復節」的荒謬". Liberty Times (in Chinese). Taipei. October 26, 2011. Retrieved August 22, 2015.
  11. ^ 王伯仁 (October 26, 2015). "「台灣光復節」從張燈結綵到廢除爭議". Taiwan People News [zh] (in Chinese). Taipei. Retrieved May 13, 2016.
  12. ^ Charney, Jonathan I.; Prescott, J. R. V. (July 2000). "Resolving Cross-Strait Relations between China and Taiwan". The American Journal of International Law. 94 (3): 453. doi:10.2307/2555319. JSTOR 2555319. After occupying Taiwan in 1945 as a result of Japan's surrender, the Nationalists were defeated on the mainland in 1949, abandoning it to retreat to Taiwan. In that year the PRC was established.
  13. ^ Charney & Prescott (2000).
  14. ^ United States Dept of State (11 Nov 1950). "Sec. of State (Acheson) to Sec. of Defense (Marshall)". Foreign relations of the United States. Washington DC: US GPO: 554–5. Retrieved 9 January 2015.
  15. ^ Far East (Formosa and the Pescadores), Hansard, 4 May 1955, retrieved 2015-12-09
  16. ^ Lowther, William (9 Jun 2013). "CIA report shows Taiwan concerns". Taipei Times. p. 1. Archived from the original on 2013-07-13. Retrieved 2013-06-10. [Quoting from a declassified CIA report on Taiwan written in March 1949] From the legal standpoint, Taiwan is not part of the Republic of China. Pending a Japanese peace treaty, the island remains occupied territory in which the US has proprietary interests.
  17. ^ Ng, Yuzin Chiautong (1972). Historical and Legal Aspects of the International Status of Taiwan (Formosa) (2nd ed.). Tokyo: World United Formosans for Independence. LCCN 74165355. Retrieved 2010-02-25.
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Surrender of Japan in Taiwan.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Retrocession_Day&oldid=1040881052"