Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 January 29

< January 28

January 30 >

January 29

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 29, 2019.

The dufflebag

• The dufflebag → Duffel bag  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This redirect is a combination of (1) the inferior spelling "duffle" for "duffel", the origin of which is Duffel, (2) made into a closed compound word as a misspelling, and (3) with a definite article, "the", prefixed. This amount of error makes this an unworthy redirect, and thus I propose it should be deleted. (Prior history: Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 January 11#The dufflebag) Bsherr (talk) 22:27, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

• Keep per WP:CHEAP. It is an alternative spelling, not a misspelling, but even if it was, that's not a reason for deletion of redirects. There is even a whole RCAT for these redirects, see {{R from misspelling}}. As for the definite article, that also isn't an automatic deletion. See, for example, Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 December 7#The Google, Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 October 3#The Scott Block Theatre and Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 May 13#The coldest place. -- Tavix ^(talk) 01:18, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

  However, the former two are proper nouns, and the latter is a noun phrase that if ever used in a sentence necessarily would include the definite article. All are distinguishable form this instance. --Bsherr (talk) 23:15, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

• Delete since besides the nom's rationale, the use of the word "the" can hint that there is only one of its topic (or, in this case, its target), but that is not the case since there are probably countless amounts of duffel bags in the world. Steel1943 (talk) 22:48, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
• Keep per Tavix. The redirect is not misspelled, the definite article is not harmful or misleading and there are no other benefits that will come from deletion. Thryduulf (talk) 10:32, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
• Keep There are multiple products and companies called "The Duffle Bag" (e.g. [1][2][3][4][5]). The best place to redirect anyone searching for those is to Duffel bag.--Pontificalibus 17:45, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

  At present, The Duffle Bag does not exist. --Bsherr (talk) 00:23, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

• I do not feel that this is a plausible search term. I don't feel strongly about deleting it --- in fact, the only strong feeling I have about this matter is my mild amazement about how much volunteer time we've spent on it! --- but I don't really see much benefit to the encyclopaedia in retaining it.—S Marshall T/C 23:33, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
• Keep per Tavix and Thryduulf. Too many editors here don't realize how many casual searchers enter a phrase verbatim rather than using keywords. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 13:04, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

  I note that entering a phrase like the France or the potato – or even the potatoe, or the duffel bag – in the Wikipedia search box still gives a search result with the correct article at the top of the list. Google searches on those phrases also point to the correct Wikipedia article in the first few results (usually the top result). "Casual searchers" will have no problem finding these articles. The fact that those are all redlinks should also tell you something about Wikipedia's general approach to what constitutes a plausible term for redirection. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 19:41, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

• Keep "duffle bag" is a legitimate alternative spelling of "duffel bag", Google shows that "The Duffle Bag" is used as a term for some duffel bag products, as noted by Pontificalibus, and I don't think leaving off the space makes it into an implausible search term. Hut 8.5 19:18, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
• Delete. This is not a plausible search term, and the redirect only exists because an inexperienced editor didn't know how to delete a bit of vandalism several years ago. The only reason we're having this discussion now is because someone wanted to make a point about deletion policy and admin authority after the needlessly long DRV discussion. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 19:41, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
• Incidentally, you can see a list of all the articles and redirects with titles starting The ... at [6]. It's pretty obvious that we don't create redirects with "The" prepended to every single noun. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 19:48, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
• Delete. Someone searching with this term might be looking for the company by that name, or the article My First Album (Lolly album). The redirect hijacks their search from invoking the search engine, and dumps them at an article they surely already know about. Delete in favour of letting the search engine do its job. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:56, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and per TenOfAllTrades: an implausible spelling + hijacking legitimate, for the sake of making some sort of a face-saving point, is pretty disruptive. --Calton | Talk 09:54, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Googol Megaplex

• Googol Megaplex → Googol  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unsure of whether this redirect refers to Googolplex or something else. Maybe it should be deleted? Jalen D. Folf (talk) 19:19, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

• Weak keep: A quick check using the appropriate search engine shows that this term has been used to define a very large number, though the author of the definition is not known. The article creator insisted that the term came about in May 2009 (the same month the article was created), but the large number wikia points the origin back to 2004. The terms "Googol megaplex" and "Googolmegaplex" appear to be valid in numerology. Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 22:24, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Windows Genuine Disadvantage

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 February 6#Windows Genuine Disadvantage

Patch (computing

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:48, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

• Patch (computing → Patch (computing)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

A redirect which omits the closing bracket is not at all useful. Also, this is WP:RDAB. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:50, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:RDAB. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 04:58, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 21:56, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. No reason to waste bandwidth on improper punctuation in this case. Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 22:25, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Aluminium poisoning

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Aluminium#Biology. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 03:48, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

• Aluminium poisoning → Aluminium#Health concerns  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Topic doesn't seem to be mentioned or identified in target article. Steel1943 (talk) 17:28, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

• Retarget to Aluminium phosphide poisoning. MarkZusab (talk) 17:55, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
  • @MarkZusab: Aluminium and Aluminium phosphide is not the same thing. Do you have evidence that "aluminium poisoning" may actually be referring to aluminium phosphide instead of elemental aluminium? -- Tavix ^(talk) 19:06, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
    • Comment A quick search for "aluminium poisoning" brings up loads of medical case studies and similar, not all of them accessible or understandable. The first one that I was able to access and understand relates to Aluminium sulphate [7], the second elemental aluminium (I think) [8]. My first impression therefore is that Aluminium phosphide poisoning isn't going to be the primary topic for the phrase, but I'll leave a note at WT:WPMED. Thryduulf (talk) 19:23, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
• Comment. While "poisoning" is not specifically discussed, the section at Aluminium#Biology discusses the effect of aluminium on humans, as well as treatment for when too much is ingested. -- Tavix ^(talk) 19:28, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
• Retarget to Aluminium#Biology. The topic is discussed there. It should definitely not be retargeted to Aluminium phosphide poisoning. -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:09, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
• Retarget to Aluminium#Biology per Edgar181--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 22:48, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
• Retarget to Aluminium#Biology per Edgar181 and Ozzie10aaaa Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:38, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
• Retarget to Aluminium#Biology. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 10:56, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Walt DisneyY

• Walt DisneyY → Walt Disney  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Absolutely useless. No one is going to type another capital "Y" at the end of Walt Disney. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:14, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

• DeleteE perR nomM. Steel1943 (talk) 17:16, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
• Delete as implausible. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 19:20, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
• Delete not a valid {{R from CamelCase}}. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 03:58, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Nobel Peace Prixe

• Nobel Peace Prixe → Nobel Peace Prize  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This is a useless redirect. There have been only 9 pageviews and people can find what they are look for when they type "Nobel Peace". This makes this redirect useless and it doesn't even appear in the search bar. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:11, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. That, and for some reason, this mispelling makes me think that if I made this mispelling, I'm looking for the "Nobel Peace Pixie", which doesn't exist ... or does it? Steel1943 (talk) 17:18, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
• Delete as an implausible typo (the nom's "they can find it when they type "Nobel Peace" argument is not a reason to delete though as that only applies to a subset of readers). My first thought was that this might be a prize for the most peaceful Grand Prix. Thryduulf (talk) 18:17, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
• Delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 03:50, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Cameroom

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 03:48, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

• Cameroom → Cameroon  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This is useless. People can find what they are looking for by typing "Cameroo". The "m" at the end doesn't make this redirect any useful. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:08, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

• Delete as an implausible typo, but not per the nominator's second sentence - that's only true for some ways people search/browse Wikipedia. Thryduulf (talk) 18:18, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Keep. I've been persuaded by the comments below that this is a plausible typo. Thryduulf (talk) 02:25, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
• Keep, a likely typo, especially to people who aren't familiar with the name of the country. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 18:19, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

  @Headbomb: That is not a likely typo as the country name as you type "Cameroo". This makes it obvious to the reader what they are looking for. Pkbwcgs (talk) 18:27, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

  @Pkbwcgs: only if you are using the internal search engine with javascript available and enabled or (some?) mobile apps. The are other ways to access Wikipedia's content in ways that do not provide search completion. Thryduulf (talk) 18:41, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

• Keep. Virtually everyone in the anglophone world uses the QWERTY keyboard, in which M and N are adjacent. (They may also be adjacent on the French AZERTY keyboard, but if you're French, you'll type "Camerou_".) That alone makes it a plausible error, compounded by the fact that one might mishear the country name and not know how it's properly spelled. And nominator's second comment is incorrect, as Cameroo is not a working redirect. Nyttend (talk) 03:48, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

（）

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 18:44, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

• （） → Bracket#Parentheses  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

These are very strange looking brackets. I copied and pages these brackets into Google and there are no hits online. It is unlikely that someone will search a rarely used brackets as the common brackets are "()". The redirect for those is at (). The 15 pageviews suggests that this isn't a worthy redirect. I don't know how to type these brackets myself but this is clearly a complicated unicode character. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:04, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

And there are no mainspace links. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:17, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

• The characters in the page title are Unicode's 65288 (hex FF08) "FULLWIDTH LEFT PARENTHESIS" and 65289 (FF09) "FULLWIDTH RIGHT PARENTHESIS". Certes (talk) 17:24, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

  @Certes: Thanks for the information. Well, it is unlikely that someone will type those characters into the search box. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:31, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

• Keep. These are very easily input when using east-Asian input methods (for example), or they can copied and pasted. The lack of internal links is explicitly not a reason to delete a redirect. Thryduulf (talk) 18:19, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

  @Thryduulf: It is unlikely that someone will copy and paste the character as not many people will be familiar with this type of character and they are not easy to input as they are not on the keyboard. Pkbwcgs (talk) 18:31, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

  Not being familiar with a character is a reason why people are more likely to copy and paste into Wikipedia to find out about it. Also, as already noted, they are readily available on the keyboard when using various input methods. Thryduulf (talk) 18:39, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

• Keep since the target contains information on fullwidth parentheses. -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:35, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

AIuminum

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:49, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

• AIuminum → Aluminium  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unlikely mispelling. The second letter is a capital "i". Steel1943 (talk) 16:29, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Delete. Pollutes the searchbox when "Aiu" is entered. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:31, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

• Delete. I likely created this redirect without realizing the capital i (but it's been 13 years (!) so who knows?) -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:33, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
• Delete because the "I" makes it implausible. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 21:36, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
• Delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 03:50, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
• Delete, but only because it's a common word, and people aren't likely to make that mistake. On some other pages, e.g. Kim Jong II, it helps to have a redirect with "I" in place of a lowercase "l". Nyttend (talk) 21:28, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List WorldChampionship Summerbiathlon

• List WorldChampionship Summerbiathlon → Summer Biathlon World Championships  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete Bad phrasing, spacing and caps make this a very unlikely search term. UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:56, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

• Delete as implausible. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 21:37, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Same (album)

• Same (album) → Eponym  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I can't find any albums (at least with articles) titled "Same" to redirect this to. I can't figure out why, in any case, it would redirect to Eponym. There might be some long story but I assume it was result of a page move/mistake somewhere along the way. Unless there is a better target, I believe it should be terminated. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 15:37, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

In some music catalogs, eponymous music albums (e.g. "The Beatles (album)") are named "Same". i see no use in this redirect, but maybe it prevents people from using that title (?) E-Kartoffel (talk) 16:12, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

List of toy mechanisms

• List of toy mechanisms → List of toys  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• List of Toy Mechanisms → List of toys  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete. PROD was declined by redirecting. But the subject is not discussed in the target article. UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:33, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Adam Pava

• Adam Pava → Out of Jimmy's Head  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This man has more than just the one credit. I want to write an article about him, but there isn't much to be found. Still, this redirect target seems inappropriate. Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 12:48, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

WP:JUSTDOIT. Turning redirects into articles is positively encouraged. 94.21.204.175 (talk) 13:41, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Off-White™

• Off-White™ → Off-White  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I can't find any specific policy against using "™" in a page title. WP:TITLETM doesn't prohibit it, MOS:TM says "Do not use the ™ and ® symbols, or similar, in either article text or citations" but doesn't say not to use it in page titles. I thought the article title was considered part of the article text, but can't find anywhere that says that. I still say Delete this because it can't be used in running text, it is unlikely to be typed, has no incoming links, and has had no views in the last 30 days. (It also breaks the Page Views tool when clicked from "Page Information" - but not from here.) 94.21.204.175 (talk) 12:28, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Delete. There is a related mass-nomination from four days ago going on here. UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:06, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, that's a coincidence. I guess it's too late to combine it into that mass-nomination. I did some WP:BEFORE but intitle:™ search brings up 0 results, otherwise I would have noted it there. (I've just tried with a regex search, which does work, but times out.) 94.21.204.175 (talk) 02:05, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Correct knowledge

• Correct knowledge → Vidya (Knowledge)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No mention of "Correct knowledge" in target article. Search results are generally not about Vidya. Possible POV. Certes (talk) 12:24, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Update: I found the phrase in an old version of a duplicate article Vidyā, but I still don't think it justifies the redirect. Certes (talk) 16:35, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

• Delete as impossibly vague. There are all sorts page that refer to "correct knowledge" but none significantly or as a term of art that I can see. Thryduulf (talk) 13:48, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
• It's unlikely that a native English speaker would type this phrase in the search box, but it seems to me very plausible that an ESL speaker could do so. I'd assume they were looking for an article about how scholars evaluate the truth of a proposition. In other words, I think this search term should point to philosophical articles about truth values. Consider whether the outcome could be, for example, disambiguate between Validity (logic), Truth table and List of fallacies?—S Marshall T/C 18:53, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

List of programs broadcast by Cartoon Network (Netherlands and Flanders)

• List of programs broadcast by Cartoon Network (Netherlands and Flanders) → List of programs broadcast by Cartoon Network  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I don't think this redirect has relevance on the English Wikipedia for this particular target...unless I'm missing something. Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 12:17, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

• Off-topic comment: This redirect's disambiguator made me think of Ned Flanders. Possible influence for the character's name? Steel1943 (talk) 16:36, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Cartoon Network Original Series

• Cartoon Network Original Series → List of programs broadcast by Cartoon Network  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete as redundant. A better redirect already exists. No need for grammatically incorrect caps. Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 12:16, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

• Keep. Neither redundancy nor incorrect capitalisation are reasons to delete a redirect and the current target is the best I can find. Thryduulf (talk) 13:50, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Cartoon Network Original Series and Movies

• Cartoon Network Original Series and Movies → List of programs broadcast by Cartoon Network  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete as redundant. A better redirect already exists. No need for grammatically incorrect caps. Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 12:15, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Cartoon network original series and movies

• Cartoon network original series and movies → List of programs broadcast by Cartoon Network  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Redundant, pointless redirect. Cartoon Network original series and movies already exists. Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 12:13, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

• Keep - a perfectly normal and perfectly harmless {{R from incorrect capitalisation}}. Redirects like this one enable users to find articles they are looking for when using case sensitive methods of searching and browsing Wikipedia. Thryduulf (talk) 13:52, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

All That (television series)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 03:49, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

• All That (television series) → All That  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unnecessary disambiguation. Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 12:11, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

• Keep per {{R from unnecessary disambiguation}}. Thryduulf (talk) 13:52, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
• Keep per Thryduulf. Steel1943 (talk) 16:40, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
• Comment: Actually it is {{R from incorrect disambiguation}}. --Gonnym (talk) 15:07, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
  • It's both – both unnecessary and incorrect disambiguation. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 15:13, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Nickeloden's All That

• Nickeloden's All That → All That  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Nickelodeon's All That? I can't find this official title anywhere. Might as well have redirects for Nickelodeon's Drake & Josh, Nickelodeon's CatDog, and Nickelodeon's SpongeBob SquarePants too. Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 12:10, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

• Keep. This has existed since 2008, gets used and is a perfectly logical way of ensuring you arrive at the article you are looking for. The other redirects you mention would also be fine for the same reasons (assuming they're correct, I haven't looked). Thryduulf (talk) 13:54, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
• Delete. Nickelodeon is also misspelled. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:04, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

I was so hasty with this that I didn't even notice the misspelling! Another reason to delete this. Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 22:27, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

• Delete. I was considering to vote "keep" until the mispelling was pointed out. Yep, get it outta here. Steel1943 (talk) 01:48, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Toys In The Attic (Rugrats Episode)

• Toys In The Attic (Rugrats Episode) → List of Rugrats episodes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete as redundant. Toys In The Attic (Rugrats episode) already exists, and it doesn't even follow capitalization conventions. Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 11:59, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

• Keep. Redundancy is not a reason to delete a redirect, and redirects from plausible other capitalisations (such as this) are a Good Thing. Readers are not required to know our capitalisation conventions. Thryduulf (talk) 13:56, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
• Keep. The article itself should follow capitalization guidelines, which is why I moved it, leaving this redirect. There is no such requirement for redirects. Remember redirects are cheap; they shouldn't be deleted unless they're actively incorrect or harmful, which this is not. Hairy Dude (talk) 15:02, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
• Delete since the redirect is redundant to Toys In The Attic (Rugrats episode), and since the word "episode" is not a proper noun or part of a subject named "Rugrats Episode", which doesn't exist. Steel1943 (talk) 16:39, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
• Delete. I think there is reason to distinguish if the miscapitalization is in the disambiguator. No incoming links on Wikipedia. I agree with Steel1943. --Bsherr (talk) 00:43, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
• Nominator comment: Both Toys In The Attic (Rugrats Episode) and Toys In The Attic (Rugrats episode) appear in WP's search suggestions. This redirect with improper capitalization just adds clutter to the search suggestions. Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 22:31, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Once again, search suggestions only exist for some ways of finding Wikipedia content. The existence of a similar redirect is therefore not a reason for deletion. Thryduulf (talk) 14:42, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
• Keep How could it be harmful? The title already capitalises two words that normally aren't capitalised in titles; one might expect "Episode" to be capitalised as well. And there's no possible alternate meaning with which this could get confused. Nyttend (talk) 03:51, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

The tryicycle thief/ rhinoceritis

• The tryicycle thief/ rhinoceritis → List of Rugrats episodes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete as redundant. The Tricycle Thief / Rhinoceritis! already exists. Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 11:58, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

• Keep. Redundancy is not a reason to delete a redirect, and redirects from plausible other capitalisations (such as this) are a Good Thing. Readers are not required to know our capitalisation conventions. Thryduulf (talk) 13:56, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

  This is an implausible typo, though, not just an alternative capitalization. CHEAP might apply, but in no way is this redirect a good thing. Sideways713 (talk) 17:33, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

• Delete, too many errors to be useful. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:06, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
• Nominator comment: If this redirect is fine, but unnecessary (as seems to be the consensus so far), then that opens the door for an endless directory of unnecessary redirects with typos and grammatical errors based on TV episodes. In this case, the proper redirect target would be to a specific episode or at least a specific season. Any time the target's title is modified, all redirects that point to it would also have to be modified to point to the proper target or be broken. I nominated this to lighten the workload. Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 22:35, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
• Delete. Spelling error + lack of spacing + capitalisation variant + missing punctuation = implausible. Any one of those is a good reason for a redirect, but maybe not any pair of them, and definitely not all four at once. Nyttend (talk) 21:31, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Rug Rats (Pilot)

• Rug Rats (Pilot) → List of Rugrats episodes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete. This was never the name of the pilot episode. Edit history is garbage. Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 11:57, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

• Comment. If this were "(pilot episode)" or "(Pilot Episode)" or something like that, then I'd say to probably keep it, but as it is I'm uncertain given the wide variety of meanings "pilot" can have. Thryduulf (talk) 13:59, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
• Delete. Combination of a (1) misspelling by way of separating the compound word, (2) incorrect name for the pilot episode, (3) ambiguous and therefore unlikely disambiguator, and (4) miscapitalized disambiguator. This makes for an undesirable redirect. --Bsherr (talk) 00:48, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

New Kid in Town (Nicktoons episode)

• New Kid in Town (Nicktoons episode) → List of Rugrats episodes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete as redundant because New Kid in Town (Rugrats episode) already exists. Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 11:56, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

• Keep. Redundancy is not a reason to delete a redirect - readers are not required to know our naming conventions. Thryduulf (talk) 13:59, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
• Delete. This is not an episode of "Nicktoons". This redirect is akin to disambiguating by a higher-level topic, which in most cases, is not helpful. For example, there is a topic at Kick (association football), but one would not describe it as "Kick (skill)", or The Pack (Buffy the Vampire Slayer) as "The Pack (The WB)". Steel1943 (talk) 17:41, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
• Delete. This is an unlikely-to-be-mistaken-for disambiguation. --Bsherr (talk) 00:50, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

At the Movies (Rugrats episodes)

• At the Movies (Rugrats episodes) → List of Rugrats episodes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete as implausible redirect. Disambiguation contains "episodes" when "episode" would suffice. Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 11:54, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

• Retarget to At the Movies (Rugrats). Given that this was, according to the lead of the article, a mutli-part episode the search term is not implausible. Thryduulf (talk) 14:01, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
• Delete since the subject At the Movies (Rugrats) is neither a list nor a series of episodes. Steel1943 (talk) 18:57, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
• Delete. This is one episode, not multiple episodes. When I first saw this, I thought it was the name for the series of Rugrats movies. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:11, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Rugrats (Vacation)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:50, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

• Rugrats (Vacation) → Rugrats  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Improper redirect written in an unusual format (series with episode name in parenthesis). Delete as implausible redirect. Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 11:52, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

• Delete. This is an unlikely-to-be-mistaken-for format for the article name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bsherr (talk • contribs) 00:52, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
• Delete. I imagine I created this to deal with a redlink. There are no articles for the individual episodes and no incoming links to the redirect, so a placeholding redirect doesn't seem useful. Josh Parris 00:48, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

THEORY OF SOCIAL RESPONSE: COMPUTERS ARE SOCIAL ACTORS

• THEORY OF SOCIAL RESPONSE: COMPUTERS ARE SOCIAL ACTORS → Computers are social actors  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete Per WP:RCAPS UnitedStatesian (talk) 11:27, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

• Keep as a harmless {{R from move}}. Thryduulf (talk) 14:03, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
• Delete, bizarre phrasing and caps. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:41, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Diet Dark Knight

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy deleted per G7 by Athaenara. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:10, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

• Diet Dark Knight → Arrow (TV series)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Phrase does not seem like a likely search phrase. Has no incomming links, is not mentioned in the article and does not appear in google search results (at least not in the first two pages, not even when adding "arrow". Gonnym (talk) 11:14, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

• Delete per nom, and since the target is not a drink. Steel1943 (talk) 18:58, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

• Delete, it's definitly not a common phrase likely to be searched, and it seems more like a creation of personal opinion.Babspage (talk) 00:04, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete Db-G7 since user:Babspage created the redirect and agrees that it should be deleted. Perhaps Babs can explain why he or she created it in the first place, and now that it is up for deletion has created the equally useless redirect Burp Burp Dunkelsnack, and previously created Iron Man 19 and Poor People: The Musical? Meters (talk) 05:00, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
  • And let's not forget the attack redirect Better Than Bronx Science Meters (talk) 05:05, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mommy Fearest (Powerpuff Girls episode)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 03:49, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

• Mommy Fearest (Powerpuff Girls episode) → List of The Powerpuff Girls episodes#Season 1  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete as implausible. "Mommy Fearest" already exists and points to the same target. The disambiguation is totally unnecessary. Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 10:24, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

• Keep per {{R from unnecessary disambiguation}}. Redirects like this are useful. Thryduulf (talk) 14:04, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
• Keep per Thryduulf. Steel1943 (talk) 20:15, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Geshundfight (The Powerpuff Girls episode)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 03:49, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

• Geshundfight (The Powerpuff Girls episode) → List of The Powerpuff Girls episodes#Season 1  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete as implausible. "Geshundfight" already exists and points to the same target. The disambiguation is entirely unnecessary. EDIT: And it seems I'm actually the one who created this redirect... Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 10:22, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

• Keep per {{R from unnecessary disambiguation}}. A useful redirect. Thryduulf (talk) 16:42, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
• Weak keep per Thryduulf. I say "weak keep" due to the use of the word "The"; it's not inaccurate, but there also doesn't seem to be a precedence for using it either. Steel1943 (talk) 20:17, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Powerpuff Bluff (Powerpuff Girls episode)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 03:49, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

• Powerpuff Bluff (Powerpuff Girls episode) → List of The Powerpuff Girls episodes#Season 1  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete as implausible. "Powerpuff Bluff" already exists and has the same redirect target. Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 10:21, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

• Keep per {{R from unnecessary disambiguation}}. Redirects like this are useful. Thryduulf (talk) 14:04, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
• Keep per Thryduulf. Steel1943 (talk) 20:16, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mommy Fearest...

• Mommy Fearest... → List of The Powerpuff Girls episodes#Season 1  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete as implausible. "Mommy Fearest" already redirects to the episode list. The title with ellipses has never been the official episode title. Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 10:19, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Octi Evil (Powerpuff Girls episodes)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 03:49, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

• Octi Evil (Powerpuff Girls episodes) → List of The Powerpuff Girls episodes#Season 1  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete as implausible. The redirect for "Octi Evil" already exists. Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 10:18, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

• Keep per {{R from unnecessary disambiguation}}. Redirects like this are useful. Thryduulf (talk) 14:04, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
• Keep per Thryduulf. Steel1943 (talk) 20:16, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Powerpuff Bluff(Powerpuff Girls episode)

• Powerpuff Bluff(Powerpuff Girls episode) → List of The Powerpuff Girls episodes#Season 1  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The whole reason this redirect exists is because someone forgot the spacing over 10 years ago. I say it should be deleted as implausible. Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 10:16, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:RDAB. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:38, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:RDAB. Steel1943 (talk) 20:18, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:RDAB. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 06:54, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Mineralogical Magazine

• Mineralogical Magazine → Mineralogical Abstracts  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Mineralogical Abstracts was a supplement to Mineralogical Magazine and Journal of the Mineralogical Society. It makes no sense to redirect the larger organizations to the side-product. This should be deleted per WP:REDLINK. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 06:40, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

I created the redirect in 2013. It's true that Mineralogical Abstracts was a supplement to Mineralogical Magazine and Journal of the Mineralogical Society. However, in WP there is no page (that I know of), that conveys more info on Mineralogical Magazine than the Mineralogical Abstracts page. Therefore I consider the redirect serves a useful function, until a Mineralogical Magazine page is created. DadaNeem (talk) 11:47, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

• Comment my first thought is that the redirect should be reversed and a brief stub written about the main magazine. Thryduulf (talk) 14:06, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Great French War

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 03:49, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

• Great French War → French Revolutionary Wars  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete as neologism unused or little-used outside Wikipedia (criterion #8); see Google Books and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Great French War, where an article on the neologism was deleted. Ribbet32 (talk) 05:24, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Keep. Not a neologism, certainly, since used by 19th-century historians: [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14] and so on. Hits from the Google Books search, but not -wikipedia. No need to be deleting this. Charles Matthews (talk) 05:56, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Interesting, though I notice many of those use lower case (as in, not a WP:PROPERNAME). Google Books indicates the term has been used loosely for various conflicts, most not the Revolutionary Wars (a few more for the Napoleonic Wars, actually). Ribbet32 (talk) 00:12, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

{{redirect|Great French War}} can be used in a hatnote for some further clarification, somewhere. It is forgivable, surely, to ignore the Peace of Amiens and see there as being a single conflict. In any case the term has a certain traditional standing. Charles Matthews (talk) 11:51, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

• Keep per Charles Matthews. Thryduulf (talk) 14:44, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
• Keep per Charles Matthews. If I saw "Great French war" in print, I'd be inclined to think it a typographical error for "Great French War". No prejudice to changing the target if desired. Nyttend (talk) 21:34, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

'Gilets jaunes' protestation

• 'Gilets jaunes' protestation → Yellow vests movement  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unnecessary for the ' B dash (talk) 00:17, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Government shutdown (version 2)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy deleted per WP:G6. -- Tavix ^(talk) 19:21, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

• Government shutdown (version 2) → Government shutdown  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unnecessary and implausible redirect B dash (talk) 00:10, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

• Keep since this redirect is currently a {{R with history}} that needs to be retained per WP:CCC. I would recommend that the nominator check such redirects in the future (per WP:BEFORE) as I ended up moving the edit history in their previous nomination to a different title so that the redirect was safe to delete. At the present time, that is not the case with this one. Steel1943 (talk) 16:44, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete per WP:G6 now that Tavix has moved the edit history elsewhere. Steel1943 (talk) 19:19, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
    •  Done. -- Tavix ^(talk) 19:21, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
• Comment I moved the pre-move history of Government shutdown (version 2) back to Government shutdown, so the edit history thereof now matches the title. This redirect is no longer a {{R with history}}. -- Tavix ^(talk) 19:17, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.