Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Ed Piskor: small addition
Line 107: Line 107:
* {{pagelinks|Francis Scott Key Bridge collapse}}
* {{pagelinks|Francis Scott Key Bridge collapse}}
'''Reason:''' ip vandalism [[User:ToadetteEdit|<span style="color:#fc65b8;">'''Toadette'''</span>]] <sup>''([[User talk:ToadetteEdit|<span style="color:blue;">Let's talk together!</span>]])''</sup> 21:38, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
'''Reason:''' ip vandalism [[User:ToadetteEdit|<span style="color:#fc65b8;">'''Toadette'''</span>]] <sup>''([[User talk:ToadetteEdit|<span style="color:blue;">Let's talk together!</span>]])''</sup> 21:38, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
:[[File:Pictogram voting info.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Already protected'''.<!-- Template:RFPP#ispr --> <span style="font-family:Garamond;">[[User:Goodnightmush|<b style="color: Black">Goodnight</b><span style="color: silver">mush</span>]][[User talk:Goodnightmush|<sup style="color:blue">Talk</sup>]]</span> 01:29, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

=== [[:History of the world's tallest buildings]] ===
=== [[:History of the world's tallest buildings]] ===
* {{pagelinks|1=History of the world's tallest buildings}}
* {{pagelinks|1=History of the world's tallest buildings}}

Revision as of 01:29, 6 April 2024

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Requests for page protection

You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level".
Return to Requests for page protection.

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing of puppy IP. ——重庆轨交18 (talk) 10:08, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please also enforce WP:CT/FG. IanDBeacon (talk) 21:48, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and sockpuppetry. Skitash (talk) 14:02, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and sockpuppetry. Skitash (talk) 14:03, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent incessant target of vandalism as can be seen in the last few days of edits. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 14:30, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temperory Semi- Protection of 6 weeks: constant IP vandalism continuing after previous protection expired. Biased editing by IPs and constant pov pushing. Imsaneikigai (talk) 14:52, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --Another Believer (Talk) 15:51, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IPs inserting stuff that does not follow the article's long established conventions despite repeated explanations Borgenland (talk) 16:20, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Suggested by Ponyo on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ireneirenegoncalves, sockpuppet target. ClumsyOwlet (talk) 17:37, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing from various IPs. Armegon (talk) 17:47, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Since the page protection expired, there have been multiple IP edits from various IPs who keep vandalising the page. Most of these edits have been reverted. Page needs full protection once again, ideally without an ending date. RM-Taylor (talk) 18:22, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeatedly created by multiple users. Palak Sidhwani is already protected, so this, as well as Palak Sindhwani (actress, born 1998), should be protected too. GSS💬 18:58, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – multiple attempted hijacks of article in last 48 hours from different IPs. Funnyfarmofdoom (talk to me) 19:24, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing from numerous IP users; changing the end date to last April, when a new episode actually aired back in November. Unless this page gets protected, the edits from these IPs will continue. BrickMaster02 (talk) 19:40, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I am requesting page protection for this account because of a San Francisco Examiner article published today that highlighted the editorial biases that occur, especially for candidates running for office. This page was mentioned in the article. Here is a link: https://www.sfexaminer.com/news/politics/san-francisco-political-battles-are-being-waged-on-wikipedia/article_5d070c58-f141-11ee-87d2-d33f4b11ba6e.html

The article is entitled "San Francisco Wikipedia Wars" and highlights the tensions and battles between editors. It highlights how users have violated Wikipedia's policy of NPOV. A comment includes "[Wikipedia] is not neutral, and it reflects the editorial biases of people who have the time and skill to edit it ..." Because of the publicity surrounding this article, I am asking for temporary protection of this article and for experienced editors to make this article NPOV. SFHistorian1850 (talk) 20:28, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I am requesting page protection for this account because of a San Francisco Examiner article published today that highlighted the editorial biases that occur, especially for candidates running for office. This page was mentioned in the article. Here is a link: https://www.sfexaminer.com/news/politics/san-francisco-political-battles-are-being-waged-on-wikipedia/article_5d070c58-f141-11ee-87d2-d33f4b11ba6e.html

The article is entitled "San Francisco Wikipedia Wars" and highlights the tensions and battles between editors. It highlights how users have violated Wikipedia's policy of NPOV. A comment includes "[Wikipedia] is not neutral, and it reflects the editorial biases of people who have the time and skill to edit it ..." Because of the publicity surrounding this article, I am asking for temporary protection of this article and for experienced editors to make this article NPOV. SFHistorian1850 (talk) 20:28, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I am requesting page protection for this account because of a San Francisco Examiner article published today that highlighted the editorial biases that occur, especially for candidates running for office. This page was mentioned in the article. Here is a link: https://www.sfexaminer.com/news/politics/san-francisco-political-battles-are-being-waged-on-wikipedia/article_5d070c58-f141-11ee-87d2-d33f4b11ba6e.html

The article is entitled "San Francisco Wikipedia Wars" and highlights the tensions and battles between editors. It highlights how users have violated Wikipedia's policy of NPOV. A comment includes "[Wikipedia] is not neutral, and it reflects the editorial biases of people who have the time and skill to edit it ..." Because of the publicity surrounding this article, I am asking for temporary protection of this article and for experienced editors to make this article NPOV. SFHistorian1850 (talk) 20:28, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry per WP:CITE and repetitive WP:ORIGINAL WP:RS violations Exp691 (talk) 20:30, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Constant disruptive IP edits Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 20:37, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Euryalus (talk) 20:42, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandals keep adding incorrect birth year for no reason despite the fact that it’s sourced properly. Trillfendi (talk) 21:12, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qzd (talk) 21:22, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: ip vandalism Toadette (Let's talk together!) 21:38, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. GoodnightmushTalk 01:29, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Relativity ⚡️ 23:16, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting it again. Article has been target quite frequently and the last 15 edits shown in the page history show a lot of royal family related vandalism, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HH Crown Prince Wayne of Markham. I think protection is needed as Markham is this vandal's prime target, he keeps claiming Markham has some sort of royal family or something. WizardGamer775 (talk) 23:49, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HH Crown Prince Wayne of Markham- this user keeps claiming that cities in Ontario, and more particularly the Region of York have royal families that govern them. If you look in the page history this is a persistent problem. WizardGamer775 (talk) 23:50, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-Protection Piskor was a cartoonist who, two weeks ago, was accused of grooming a younger artist back when she was 17. A second cartoonist told a similar story. Both accusers' identities were public from the start. One week later, on April 1, Piskor committed suicide, leaving behind a note that also mentioned his accusers by name. All of this information is sourced and cited multiple times within the article. Today, an IP address, as well as brand a new account, has been attempting to delete all mention of the accusers' names. Once again, they posted the accusations publicly and multiple news sources have reported this information. NJZombie (talk) 00:19, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]