Jump to content

Wikipedia:Signpost/Templates/Signpost-article-comments-end/commentspage/doc

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Usage

This appears transcluded at the top of talk pages for Signpost articles. These talk pages are themselves transcluded in a couple of places:

  • The Signpost articles themselves
Underneath the article, e.g. Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2022-01-30/Arbitration report.
  • Single-talk pages
All of the talk pages for an issue in a row, e.g. Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/Single/2022-01-30

The idea is that this template gives a little link back to the main article, and explains that it's a comment page, but ONLY on the talk page itself -- in both of the places where this talk page gets transcluded, this is basically unhelpful noise, so it isn't included there.


Code

There is kind of a complicated test going on here, which is kind of complicated, so I will try to excerpt and explain:

{{#ifeq:{{is time|{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}|1|2}}}} {{NAMESPACE}}<!--
        -->|1 Wikipedia talk

This is a bit of fun with parser functions.

Classes and styles

This uses two classes, both styled at Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Templates/external.css and Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Templates/master.css (split out on 22:35, 6 July 2024 (UTC)).

  • signpost-commentspage1
  • signpost-commentspage2

Sample transclusion of this template (includes full Signpost comments page)

Note: original page is Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2022-01-30/Arbitration report.
  • The current scope is "all pages related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan"; the amendment would expand it to cover "all pages related to political or religious topics and closely related people in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, including but not limited to castes". — Isn't that a contraction rather than an expansion? —2d37 (talk) 21:45, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You're right, I believe. I will double-check to make sure. jp×g 22:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]