Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Scientologist Perspective: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Luna Santin (talk | contribs) resp |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude> |
<noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude> |
||
{{SPIarchive notice|Scientologist Perspective}}<br />{{SPIpriorcases}} |
{{SPIarchive notice|Scientologist Perspective}}<br />{{SPIpriorcases}} |
||
Line 27: | Line 26: | ||
{{Endorse}}. Obviously not a new user, as per the evidence above. Likely some old troll, but a CU would have to look further here. --<small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">[[User:Kanonkas|<b>Kanonkas</b>]] : [[User talk:Kanonkas|<font style="color:#accC10;background:#0000fa;"> Talk </font>]] </span></small> 23:21, 1 August 2009 (UTC) |
{{Endorse}}. Obviously not a new user, as per the evidence above. Likely some old troll, but a CU would have to look further here. --<small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">[[User:Kanonkas|<b>Kanonkas</b>]] : [[User talk:Kanonkas|<font style="color:#accC10;background:#0000fa;"> Talk </font>]] </span></small> 23:21, 1 August 2009 (UTC) |
||
::{{confirmed}}, also {{checkuser|JustifiedEnduringly}}. – <small>[[User:Luna Santin|<font color="#28f">Luna Santin</font>]] ([[User talk:Luna Santin|talk]])</small> 13:53, 3 August 2009 (UTC) |
|||
;Conclusions |
;Conclusions |
||
Revision as of 13:53, 3 August 2009
Scientologist Perspective
- Scientologist Perspective (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Report date August 1 2009, 17:50 (UTC)
- Suspected sockpuppets
- DianeticsBridgeToKnowingness (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Both users tried to add fluff to L. Ron Hubbard in a similar vein. Scientologist Perspective was blocked for a username violation, while DianeticsBridgeToKnowingness was blocked for disruption and falsely calling myself and Toddst1 trolls. Unblock request from DianeticsBridgeToKnowingness clearly indicates that this is not a new user--requesting sweep to find master account. Blueboy96 17:50, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
- Comments by accused parties See Defending yourself against claims.
- Comments by other users
- CheckUser requests
{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.
- Checkuser request – code letter: F (Other reason )
- Current status –
Endorsed for Checkuser attention. Requested by Blueboy96 17:50, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
- Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Clerk endorsed. Obviously not a new user, as per the evidence above. Likely some old troll, but a CU would have to look further here. --Kanonkas : Talk 23:21, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
Confirmed, also JustifiedEnduringly (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki). – Luna Santin (talk) 13:53, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- Conclusions