Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Scientologist Perspective: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Luna Santin (talk | contribs)
resp
Line 1: Line 1:

<noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude>
<noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude>
{{SPIarchive notice|Scientologist Perspective}}<br />{{SPIpriorcases}}
{{SPIarchive notice|Scientologist Perspective}}<br />{{SPIpriorcases}}
Line 27: Line 26:
{{Endorse}}. Obviously not a new user, as per the evidence above. Likely some old troll, but a CU would have to look further here. --<small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">[[User:Kanonkas|<b>Kanonkas</b>]] : [[User talk:Kanonkas|<font style="color:#accC10;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;Talk&nbsp;</font>]] </span></small> 23:21, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
{{Endorse}}. Obviously not a new user, as per the evidence above. Likely some old troll, but a CU would have to look further here. --<small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">[[User:Kanonkas|<b>Kanonkas</b>]] : [[User talk:Kanonkas|<font style="color:#accC10;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;Talk&nbsp;</font>]] </span></small> 23:21, 1 August 2009 (UTC)


::{{confirmed}}, also {{checkuser|JustifiedEnduringly}}. – <small>[[User:Luna Santin|<font color="#28f">Luna Santin</font>]] ([[User talk:Luna Santin|talk]])</small> 13:53, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
;Conclusions
;Conclusions



Revision as of 13:53, 3 August 2009

Scientologist Perspective

Scientologist Perspective (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
Report date August 1 2009, 17:50 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by Blueboy96

Both users tried to add fluff to L. Ron Hubbard in a similar vein. Scientologist Perspective was blocked for a username violation, while DianeticsBridgeToKnowingness was blocked for disruption and falsely calling myself and Toddst1 trolls. Unblock request from DianeticsBridgeToKnowingness clearly indicates that this is not a new user--requesting sweep to find master account. Blueboy96 17:50, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users


CheckUser requests

{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.

Checkuser request – code letter: F (Other reason )
Current status – Endorsed for Checkuser attention.    Requested by Blueboy96 17:50, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 Clerk endorsed. Obviously not a new user, as per the evidence above. Likely some old troll, but a CU would have to look further here. --Kanonkas :  Talk  23:21, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed, also JustifiedEnduringly (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki). – Luna Santin (talk) 13:53, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Conclusions