Wikipedia:Speedy deletions

If you've come here having recently created a page that has just been marked to say it may soon be deleted, then please understand that we mean no harm in deleting your page. In fact, welcome to Wikipedia. We're delighted to have you, but the page you created seemed to be something other than an encyclopedia article. If it was a test, congratulations – you succeeded in creating a page. Please use the sandbox for further testing, or create a user page for yourself.

If your article was not a test, you may have created a page that met the criteria for speedy deletion. If so, please see our guidelines on writing perfect stubs to see how you could improve the page to something that will not be instantly deletable.

For more information, please read our deletion policy.

Using this page

For articles that need deletion, add {{deletebecause|Reason.}} or {{db|Reason.}} to the top of the page. You should not wipe out the contents as it helps to check the contents to be deleted without having to look at the page history. This expands to:

Replace Reason with the reason why the page should be deleted under the speedy deletion criteria.

Other templates available that give a reason include {{nonsense}} and {{db-bio}}. They may be used where appropriate.

(You can also use {{delete}} or {{d}} if you prefer not to provide a reason, but it is generally a good idea to provide a reason, even where it seems "obvious" to you.)

Note that if you just replace the content with {{db|reason}} the prior content will not be automatically added to the deletion log summary when the page is deleted.

See below for instructions regarding the deletion of personal subpages.

For articles that do not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, please use Wikipedia:Proposed deletion (for deletions likely to meet no opposition) or Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (for controversial deletions). Please do not list pages here that are already listed there.

Advice for administrators

• Review our admin deletion guidelines
• Use Category:Candidates for speedy deletion for a list of pages
• Check talk pages, page history, what links here (especially for potentially controversial user pages), etc. If there is a dispute over whether the page should be deleted, consider first listing it on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion
• If the page to be deleted is directly related to a specific user or that user's activities, consider moving the page to that user's personal userspace (and deleting the redirect) instead of deleting it outright.
• Don't worry too much [1] — new pages patrol is unpleasant, and people will make mistakes. Wikipedia:Speedy deletion patrol goes through the deletion logs to catch stuff that shouldn't have been speedied, without rancor or excessive red tape. Feel free to be efficient!

Deletion of personal pages

Unless you are a sysop, it is not possible to delete your own user pages and subpages, so they must be listed here. If you are a sysop, it is recommended that you also list your pages here so they can be deleted by another sysop. For your main user or talk pages, you must list them here, not delete them yourself, to avoid the appearance that sysops can delete to hide negative comments, while others can't.

Only post pages from your own personal page, and only if you have a genuine reason for requesting a personal page of yours be deleted, please list it here.

Please see Wikipedia:User page for further instructions, and Wikipedia talk:Personal subpages to be deleted for past discussion on this issue.

Requested

Note: For faster response, please add {{deletebecause|Reason.}} or {{db|Reason.}} as mentioned above.

Deletion of Articles

Utilanders

This article's title is spelt incorrectly. The actual spelling is Uitlanders. The page Utilander redirects to Utilanders, it is also misspelt so it also needs to be deleted.

Goody goody gumdrops

Pure nonsense.

I very much wish I could have seen this page before it was deleted. Could someone please tell me what it was about? · rodii · 12:24, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Claiming to be a brand of gumdrops. This has little to do with its actual usage. Dysprosia 12:54, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

What is its actual usage? I know a children's game and a 1910 Fruitgum Company song by that name. Either could conceivably have been the subject of an article. Was there nothing about them in the history? · rodii · 13:07, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Oh, not a game, a joke--I remember now. · rodii · 13:15, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

This sort of things is notable-but more suitable for the wiktionary.

? · rodii ·

Alex Bonin

I propose deletion of: Alex Bonin. Due to the fact that (no offense) he is no person of major importance to the encyclopedic world today.

Gerald "G$" Rawlins

nn prank bio, removed from SD by User:NawlinWiki in apparent edit conflict. Phr 01:48, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

Out-law.com

Copyvio and/or spam. Contrib history shows another article of vaguely similar type. Phr 01:41, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

Deletion of Redirects

Tarot (disambiguation)

This was a redirection target from Tarot and I put its contents there, so the disamb page can be deleted. I hope this is the right thing. Phr (talk) 05:28, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Daisy_Louisa_De_Melker

I have redirected a page called "Daisy_Louisa_De_Melker" to one called "Daisy_de_Melker", as that is how this person is known. My problem is that in the search box, if one types in "Daisy de Melker" one doesn't go straight to that page, but get offered three options of pages with possible info on this person. If one types in "Daisy_Louisa_De_Melker" however, one gets redirected to the correct page. Both pages are identical. The correct search term should be 'Daisy de Melker'. Can someone fix the search engine, or delete the original page please? Marcelle 14:46, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Delete article "Mali33"

Angolan War

Clear Copyvio and a good article already exists on this topic at Angolan Civil War. --Strothra 20:52, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

Questioned speedy deletions

Jodi Jusiak

I would like to contest the speedy deletion because Jodi Jusiak is acclaimed by the school staff and students as a wonderful teacher. She is well-known among the school and district, being mentioned in the school newspapers as the "Teacher Spotlight"(teacher of the month). Although she is not of a political figure, she is highly acclaimed among the school and district. Cjwillwin 23:30, May 1, 2006 (UTC)

Roman Infantry Tactics

I made a mistake when saving the article, please delete it as the actual article I was working on was Roman Military Tactics Sander 21:26, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

UI Design: Edit then List vs List then Edit

This page is not about how to build UIs, is about how UIs are built. This is not a how to, I am not explaining how to build a UIs, I am stating how UIs are built by some people and how the "pattern" used to build the page affects your choice for persistence, until now I have not been able to find a resource that discusses the implications of UI design in the persistence framework used, this article do have list of actions, but only to describe the way the user used the UIs, and how the structure of the UI, and persistence mecanisme affect the actions that the user performs--Luxspes 03:19, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

also AFAIK a how to is: an informal, often short, description of how to accomplish some specific task. They are generally meant to help non-experts, and may leave out details that are only important to experts, and may be greatly simplified from an overall discussion of the topic. See procedural knowledge for a discussion of what sort of knowledge is imparted, and how far it can be imparted, in how-tos.

1. This page does not explain how to acomplish a task, it explains how interfaces are built, now how to build them
2. This page is meant for experts, for people with experience building UIs that can contribuite with ideas about the implications for UI desing in persistence
3. An this is not procedural knowledge, I am describing patterns to build UIs and how the affect persistence, now.. UIs are used by users, and i need to explain how the user uses the ui, and on which steps the support for UI buidling from the persistence mecanism is important, for that, I need to explaing the different ways I thing an UI for data manipulation can be build (but remember I am not saying "how to built it" i am merely describing ways it can be built, if this a how to, then this Singleton pattern or this Model View Controller are also how-tos?--Luxspes 03:30, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

The Infadels

This is a page about a UK band with an album that got to number 1 in the UK dance charts, whose songs have been used in TV adverts and have been played on TV shows such as CSI, Hollyoaks, Newsround and others. I'm happy to re-write the article or for someone else to re-write the article but i can't understand why anyone would suggest the band aren't significant enough to warrant an enty, particularly baring in mind other bands who have been seen fit for inclusion. The Bass player Wag Marshall-Page has his own wikipedia reference already (Banks & Wag) and drummer Alex Bruford is refered to under his father Bill Bruford's entry. (Bill drummed for Yes, Genesis and King Crimson). Type "infadels" into google or google images" to see exactly how big the band are.

Rhyn

This is a page about an English musical group. While I agree that the band themselves have not had the chart success usually necessary for notability, they are unique in being the only band (as far as I know) to release all of their music under a creative commons free distribution licence, essentially permitting and encouraging filesharing, as long as the music is not used for commercial gain. I can rewrite the article if necessary to place greater emphasis on this factor. They have also released one full length album on an independent record label. I also added articles on the members although I would accept deletion of these as they are not really necessary.

Danrhyn 17:08, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Kyle Mullan

This is a page about the photographer Kyle Mullan, who has featured photographs in publications throughout Northern Ireland. Deleting him is acting as making him and his work out to be irrelevent to whom it is actually important.

---

The article has now been deleted. I am arguing against this deletion. I would like to speak with an admin about the deletion of this entry.

IWDN

If someone would like to discuss the criteria for the inclusion of IWDN into Wikipedia, I'd be happy to do so. I saw the Candidate for Speedy Deletion tag on it and saw deletion had taken place, though I could not find any discussion or even a brief explanation for what criterion was not met, unless it has to do with significance. If this is the case, I'm not entirely sure the best way to assert the significance of the IWDN community without sounding like I'm doing a whole lot of horn-blowing, which is not my intent at all.

IWDN is cetainly not fictitious, and it takes only a cursory perusal of its contents to see that its impact on the development industry is far from insignificant, from the communal problem solving that takes place, to the articles members post, much of which involves a good degree of original thought, all of which is done with absolutely no compensation, either on an individual member level or a site level (if commercial gain is in question with this entry).

IWDN

If someone would like to discuss the criteria for the inclusion of IWDN into Wikipedia, I'd be happy to do so. I saw the Candidate for Speedy Deletion tag on it and saw deletion had taken place, though I could not find any discussion or even a brief explanation for what criterion was not met, unless it has to do with significance. If this is the case, I'm not entirely sure the best way to assert the significance of the IWDN community without sounding like I'm doing a whole lot of horn-blowing, which is not my intent at all.

IWDN is cetainly not fictitious, and it takes only a cursory perusal of its contents to see that its impact on the development industry is far from insignificant, from the communal problem solving that takes place, to the articles members post, much of which involves a good degree of original thought, all of which is done with absolutely no compensation, either on an individual member level or a site level (if commercial gain is in question with this entry).

What information is missing from the entry that would fill in whatever gaps wree cause for deletion?

Marc Ecko

I'm not the author of this page nor do I know a tremendous amount about Marc Ecko, so I can't vouch for the explanation on the talk page saying that article was copied from his website. However, the reason given for speedy deletion, "self promotion stunt", I believe is wrong. Ecko has a following which includes a popular, although poorly received, video game (here's the Amazon link [2]) and clothing line (another Amazon link for an example [3]) . He was also in the news this weekend due to an eliborate Internet hoax regarding Air Force One [4]. Again, I can't vouch for the article or add anything new regarding Ecko, but I question the reasoning behind the speedy delete.--Ataricodfish 16:05, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

ICT_In_Education

Its a work in progress. Be a darling and give me a chance to write it. I only started it a few hours ago, and had a meeting. It'll grow over the next few days. Thanks :) AnnabelBuxton 15:58, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Kurshamidoonickilineboonikins

This is a page of a Fictional Story Character, which is expressly in your definition of what is NOT patent nonsense. It doesn't contain much information yet, but that will be worked upon. cheshirecat 6:48, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

I think it's more a case of being non-notable (e.g. we do not have an article for Natasha Szmidt et al and google search for Kurshamidoonickilineboonikins just returns a few deviant art pages) and self-promotion rather than nonsense per se. Shiroi Hane 20:06, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

• Not sure if there's a valid speedy here, but this is such an obvious deletion candidate. Non-notable, original research, vanity, Wikipedia is not a free webhost, vanispamcruftisement, whatever. The image, which has been released as PD, is watermarked "copyright natasha szmidt" with cheshirecat's deviantart URL. Basically, if not a speedy, this is deletable in just about every other way. · rodii · 20:27, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Real Social Dynamics

As you can see from the page itself, this article is one of a series. I created this new page - if you look at my contributions, you'll see I've been very active in trying to grow and maintain the Seduction Community pages, and have worked on most of the related pages. So from this angle, I'd like to make a case that the page isn't spam - I'd say I'm pretty believably not working for Real Social Dynamics, given the amount of work I've put in to growing their competitors pages.

The article is, however, a crap stub. Give me a little while to build it up with help from the other editors. Cheers!

WoodenBuddha 12:30, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Ed Gein (band)

Deleted as 'n n bio'; I browsed this page briefly before the deletion and they seems notable enough to me. They're on Metal Blade Records, and released a demo & 2 LPs. The three album pages should not be recreated, IMO, but the main page should. Colonel Tom 01:26, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Image:Virgin Killer.jpg and Image:BlindFaithBlindFaith.jpg

Fair use album covers. Yes, they are controversial, but should they be censored by Wikipedia? I believe there should be discussion of whether or not their use is justified, rather than speedy deletion. Kaldari 06:04, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Under no circumstances should these album covers be deleted. From what I remember, the girl on the Blind Faith album cover was Ginger Baker's daughter..? --Mal 08:43, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

I'm not sure why this is here but, anyway, clearly and obviously we don't delete album covers of notable albums. Nuff said. --kingboyk 19:32, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

I suppose the reason the images were proposed for deletion was that the images-- particularly the Scorpions cover-- border on kiddie porn. Considering that (according to the article) the Scorpion cover was replaced in a number of subsequent issues, it wouldn't necessarily hurt to use the current cover image instead of the original. WP does need to comply with Florida state law, and I suspect that the only reason that image could conceivably survive review is because it was slapped on an album cover, and prudentially I don't think Wikipedia should strive to become a First Amendment test case. The First Amendment does not cover obscenity, and a provocative photo of an actual child is the easiest thing in the world to ban. I did a Google search a moment ago, and there are several reports that the cover was banned in the US; I'm not surprised. Kaldari may have a point, that it's more of a debate issue than a speedy deletion issue, though Wikipedia may wish to protect itself on this one and delete first, debate later. DCB4W 15:56, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

DELETE DELETE DELETE!!! NOT right, this should NOT be on an online encyclopedia. Kids come here too, you know. GET RID OF IT!

This shouldn't be a online encyclopedia??? Who added that crazy comment :P... Anyway, i think we're all aware of Wikipedia is not censored. However, we must conform to Florida State, and US Federal, Law. If the Scorpions cover is indeed banned in America is has to be deleted. However it should not be deleted on the basis that the content is offensive or inappropriate for some, as outinled in WP: Not Censored. Thethinredline 09:44, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

User_talk:Saito_Hajime

This user has made numerous edits to articles such as Go. While generally good, some of these edits are contested, and Saito_Hajime feels strongly enough about them to revert to his own version. If someone insists on contested edits, he should have a talk page where people can talk with him. Stephen B Streater 09:15, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

See User_page "How do I delete my user and user talk pages" for WP policy on this. Stephen B Streater 09:29, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Drew Derivative

I have made an artist/songwriter bio for this person and tried editing it straight after its completion. Please do not delete this article.

Patton Electronics

I have reworked this content to address the originial objections, and bring it more into line with wiki conventions. I am wide open to being mercilessly edited and am happy to make further revisions as suggested by the editors and wiki community. Also, please consider Patton would compare in many respects with RAD Communications. Patton supplies VoIP equipment to such national telecom carriers as Avantel Mexico, Green Austria, and iNode Switzerland. Patton is well-known among network technicians aand administrators for their countless useful gizmos that solve nasty little interface problems.

Glendonflowers 16:29, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Jonathan Morris (author)

This stub was slapped with a deletion order in the midst of my writing it. While I will admit that it's entirely possible that it doesn't live up to the standards necessary for article retention, its necessity stems from the fact that Jonathan Morris was being mislinked across the Doctor Who project to the more famous priest of the same name. Something had to be done to disambiguate the two, and I was making an honest effort to try to relink the various instances of "Jonathan Morris" in the Doctor Who pages to the correct individual. As the talk page for the author has been deleted, I'd appreciate any comments on how to bring the stub up to standards, here. FWIW, this is my first article about a person, and even basic details about the author are proving somewhat elusive. Nevertheless, his output is of sufficient length, to justify some sort of separate article. Thanks in advance for your help :) CzechOut 07:14, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

After Amen

Yes, it is listed as a band. That is the intention of the article, to give information and background of an up and coming band. Any suggestions on fixing it would be appreciated. Brianm0520 05:51, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Also significance is given. Anybody in north-western Alabama knows the band. Brianm0520 06:07, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not for giving information about up and coming bands. Please see WP:WWIN. It is an encyclopaedia. Bands that have become notable are included. If you can provide documented evidence that the band is notable, I'd like to see it. Stifle (talk) 17:22, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Daniel Hollen Enterprises

It says it is a non-notable company, this is only because i have not made it notable, it's just a local company, without an internet sight or anything. No one delete it.

If it is non-notable, you don't get an article. That simple. We also frown on people writing the articles about themselves/their companies, as they tend to make it all positive and flowery. -M^ask 04:31, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Hitler group

There was an singaporen group who idolized hitler..im gonna add the page and its link to the main neo nazism page....dont anyone delete it.....

Dare Obasanjo

New Wikipedian Terrestrian seems quite intent on getting this one article deleted. Dare Obasanjo is notable for two things: he is a son of present Nigerian president Olusegun Obasanjo -- which was mentioned in that article until Terrestrian deleted it, describing the inclusion of that information as "shameless self-advertising". Obasanjo is also a well-known Microsoft employee, being part of the XML group there, amongst other things. He's also produced software -- RSS Bandit, which, while not well-described on Wikipedia, is fairly well known. "Dare Obasanjo" returns over 800,000 google hits. His personal site has an 85k Alexa rating. "RSS Bandit", over 400,000 google hits; Alexa is 75k on its homepage. There are many less noteworthy and less known people with better articles on Wikipedia; yes, the article needs some work (it didn't help that it didn't have any categorization until very recently), but if this gets deleted now, someone's just going to end up reinstating it down the line anyhow. Warrens 23:05, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Never knew that Dare Obasanjo was related to anyone significant, but he is extremely well-known in the XML/RSS/Web Standards world. · rodii · 23:21, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Chess biographies of Ali Nihat Yazici, Geoffrey Borg, and Julio César Ingolotti.

User:Phr made a request for speedy deletion of these three chess biographies and they were all deleted within a matter of a few minutes before anybody had a chance to react. These are all very well known people both in chess and in their own countries. All of them are the presidents of the chess federations of their respective countries. In no way can they be considered non-notable. Please note that User:Phr has a long history of vandalizing almost every biography I post about chess. Sam Sloan 05:09, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

These pages were all copied from campaign biographies at [5], a site for FIDE officer candidates that Sloan is trying to turn Wikipedia into a PR outlet for. The first such article Sloan pasted into Wikipedia without attribution was Panupand Vijjuprabha and I did a full AfD nomination at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Panupand_Vijjuprabha. After that article was speedied based on CSD A8, I nominated the others for speedy as they appeared based on their similarity with the already-speedied earlier article. I defer to the admins on what best to do with them but my view is that these people are non-notable, and that Wikipedia is not an appropriate venue for political campaigning. Phr 09:05, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Yazici is notable as the organizer of a multitude of FIDE official tournaments (such as the European championships, junior championships...). Borg is the secretary of the Mediterranean Chess Association. They are all Presidents of their own federations. Copyright vio -- maybe. But non-notable? I absolutely defer. _└ ^VodkaJazz/_talk^┐ 22:35, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

I'm ok with Yazici being notable, based on Google hits. Borg gets very few hits and I don't see being a functionary (including president) of a chess federation as notable in its own right. Phr 11:36, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Five-year plans of Nepal

Harro5 deleted this page claiming copyvio from [6]. The text was public domain from the Library of Congress Country Studies and the article's reference section indicated that. The other page happened to have used the text.--Bkwillwm 23:02, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Spring Thomas

Spring Thomas is well known in the Pornography world and she is mentioned in two wikipedia artichles. I'm sorry, but Pornography is relevant in todays world, like it or not. And i am not part of the industry. Be cool, guys!

Really? Any proof of this? I couldn't find any way she was notable. For the record, we do have entries on pornographic actresses (porn star is a highly bloated term, by the way), and I don't think anyone is arguing about the impact pornography has had in our culture. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. ^{Think out loud} 18:11, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Vampygames

Vampygames is extremley well known in our area, and I have heard several complaints that it still does not have a Wikipedia entry. I took the initiative and made it. I just started it, and I don't belive that it is only about individuals that don't add to the topic. I just wrote how it had started, and I was going to add more quickly. Please don't delete this right away. 8:50 EST, 9 March 3006

Keep deleted. Elf-friend 09:22, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

User:Koavf

In my opinion although this article contains many links to others it, itself serves any purpose other than to promote the creator. I feel that this self promtion has no place on wikipedia, as it serves no purpose to other users. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dazwx1101 (talk • contribs)

• ===>Oh, you're adorable They're so cute at that age. Why do they have to grow up? -Justin (koavf), talk 02:36, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
• Yes, it's a little overly-pompous, but it is a user page... That's what it's there for. Ehurtley 18:24, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
• completely non-notable editor of a web based wiki. As edits are open to anyone, this does not impart any special privliages on user. Qualifies under WP:OR as well. Phone numbers and addresses listed for a private citizen leave me wary of legal implications. Delete. ;) -M^ask 04:42, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Old Time Relijun

The article has been updated. It now gives several reasons for importance of band and notability, also including a new disc. and external links. This article has been refered to before I created it, and I am positive it will expand. Zeke73SG, JurjenL and myself are all interested in contributing. I do not believe that the matter of this article being deleted or not is any issue any longer. The0208 02:38, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

I have added Old Time Relijun's exstensive discography which should further establish their legitimacy. Also, a link to the article making reference to de Dionyso's inovative use of overtone singing.Jurjen 02:49, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

This Could Work Records

The label was previously mentioned on List of independent record labels since 6 January but an article was not made until just now. The article is significant to North Dakota culture and will expand in breadth and scope over time. --AlexWCovington (talk) 05:20, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

For small town North Dakota something that can get kids involved is a necessity. This record label has signed several local acts and releases cds periodically. --Lonegunmun 05:44, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

I've never even been to that area of the country (hell, the closest I've ever come to the Dakotas is Eastern Ohio), but I'm a huge, huge fan of Chuck Klosterman. He would want this page to exist, and thus, so do I. Kicking222 19:00, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Seiji Kameda

The reason given for this stub's speedy delete is non-notability. I have since expanded its content somewhat, and linked to other articles on Wikipedia, in an attempt to rectify the situation. I'm also going to repost what I wrote on the article's talk page:

Seiji Kameda is a music producer involved with several albums by Do As Infinity, a popular japanese band. Wikipedia pages that link to this article: Break of Dawn (album), New World (album), Do the Best, True Song (album), Gates of Heaven (album), Do The B-Side, etc, copied straight from What links here. The man appears to be a minor celebrity in Japan. I'd say that's fairly notable - hopefully the Management will see it fit to let this article grow. Tronno ( t | c ) 05:54, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Holy_Cross_Catholic_Church_in_Kalaheo

Trivial, at best needs a line in a list. non-notable. ignored since posted - essentiallyMidgley 17:26, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Speedy D. Too specific of an article. Put in list as nom. --Jared ^[T]/_[+] 21:08, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Paul B. Thompson

I have expanded this page, which includes some details about why this writer is important. He has written eleven books, many of which are Dragonlance novels.

The Jenova Project

The Jenova Project is a very popular name in the Metal scene of Bangladesh, and the mysterious nature of the band and its members adds to its popularity. The band has already achieved a kind of celebrity status among "Metal freaks". As for the band not having an album released yet...an album deal has already been signed with a record label called G-Series. The only reason why it hasn't yet been released is rather simple -- all the band members are students, and they are busy with studies, exams and whatnot, and hence the recording sessions have been put on hold until the end of May 2006. Please, PLEASE don't delete this article. - Parasyte941 11:24, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Swinburne Student Union

Important subject matter covering a controversial organisation with 40,000 members and a multi-million dollar budget. Early version did not explain that very well. Speedy delete should be removed. --2006BC 23:56, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

"Jenova Project" also appears in the computergame Final Fantasy VII

User:Shultz_III/PIHNN

This is my own user sub-page. It's not an article on the mainspace. People on the discussion at this part of Hell's talk page told me that it was a good idea to move the list to a personal subpage instead, so I did just that. It shouldn't offend freakofnurture because he isn't related to anyone on the list, and that list is somewhat of a "hobby list" (or things of that sort, whatever it's called.) --Shultz III 09:58, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Jonathan Burdick

I'm not exactly sure why this was deleted. Jonathan Burdick is the popular writer for Cinema Fusion (http://www.cinemafusion.com), which gets thousands of hits per day, and is widely spoken and discussed about on internet message boards and towns across America. He has two novels in the works, and his short writings have quickly gathered a cult following. --DoobieDoobieDoo 04:29, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

• Don't be disingenuous. Your article was deleted because it was a useless, inane crock of garbage full of lies and stupidity. If someone wants to contribute a real article on Jonathan Burdick, they are welcome to do so (assuming he is genuinely notable). DS 23:32, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

• Don't hold back, DS, tell us what you really think. :) · rodii · 16:22, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Template:Swadesh 163

User:Fourohfour put the template {{nonsense}} in that page, without asking anything to me before. I explained yesterday the reasons why I am creating a series of Swadesh xxx templates to the administrators User:Gurubrahma and User:Shreshth91. User:Fourohfour should go to talk pages BEFORE taking hasty actions. PLS remove this template from my page. Thanks. Croquant 15:00, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Tracey Philips

Shouldn't be a speedy. Article claims notability. Name is mispelled (Tracy Phillips), but, there are a couple of refs [7] including IMDB[8]. The article should be discussed at AfD if deletion considered. -- Samir (the scope) 23:37, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Jean Baptiste Sipido

Let's not speedy this. The person and incident described are real and easy to find in Google and I can see a case for this being a notable event. At most this should be an AfD with an appropriate discussion before we delete it. I don't see this being an obvious speedy, maybe all it really needs is to be expanded and improved? Gwernol 00:42, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Unless there's more that 'interesting' to this guy than this one event, I say delete. I mean, THIS page (Yes, the speedy deletion page) is the number 4 result on Google. Most of the others on the first page are simple one-sentence descriptions. If you can find more information that makes this person notable, then by all means... But otherwise, this deserves to be a footnote in some other article. Heck, I can't even find a (confirmed) birth year or death year. If he's so unimportant that no one recorded when he died, then he's not notable. (I think that's a great new way of deciding if a dead person is notable. Did someone bother to record when he died, other than a standard newspaper-issue obituary? Ehurtley 08:18, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

This has now been moved from speedy to AfD and survived there. "Jean Baptiste Sipido" right now has only 15 Google hits, when the word "wikipedia" is subtracted from the search, but he turned out to have an eighteen-page biography in the Biographie nationale, the Belgian dictionary of national biography. This is an excellent example of why Google may be of some use in indicating the notability of contemporary people but how completely and utterly useless it is in determining the lack of notability of many historical figures. Tupsharru 09:38, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

mad nigger

I redirected 'mad nigger' to Charlie Murphy, since he either invented the term or popularised its use as part of Chappelle's Show. It's been tagged for speedy deletion. What say you all? Go to the talk page and let's discuss it. - Richardcavell 07:33, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

I say delete the redirect. Nigger is a common slang term, we know that, mad is a common adjective, both are usually pejorative attributes given to people, I don't see what's special about using them together. Plus it's an unnecessarily unfortunate association for "mad nigger" to redirect to the bio of a black man. BigBlueFish 15:08, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

I agree with BigBlueFish, this is an inappropriate article to say the least.--Andeee 17:01, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Daniel Sergiacomi

This article should not be deleted as he is a local figure that many people are aware of the in region. Many people see him as a good role model for his charity and leadership skills. He should not be deleted as he is a notable person and not many people today are as worthy. The article possibly just needs to expanded and or improved.

• Being a good role model and having leadership skills does not make one WP-worthy. Wickethewok 02:46, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Charles Betts Galloway

This article should not be deleted. Its creator, User:Pastorwayne is doing great work creating dozens of articles on Methodist bishops, and this appears to be a stub for one of those -- see the list of bishops at List of Bishops of the United Methodist Church, where "Charles Betts Galloway" is listed and linked.

The stub appears to have been saved prematurely and not tagged as a stub, which is bad practice, but it is almost certainly the start of a genuine article. A quick look at User:Pastorwayne's contrib history will show what he is doing. --BrownHairedGirl 17:51, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

yes, BrownHairedGirl is correct. It is the beginning of an article. Sorry if I violated some important rule by not putting everything there right away. However, what's the big hurry to delete, anyway? If you can have a little patience, I'll fill it out. Thanks! Pastorwayne 18:11, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

University GIS Programs

• See its talk page for discussion. -Kmf164 (talk | contribs) 01:13, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Johnson, Christopher Amos

Do not delete this article please. It is in progress. Knowing Christopher Amos Johnson personally, he has done quite a bit of work in reviving the importance of the Pipe Organ. He has competed and won approximately a dozen competitions and is nationally known amongst the organist community. As his life continues, other people will document important highlights which are relevant to the musical community. Please remove the tag marking it for deletion. This is to be a promotion of a new take on an old art. C. A. Johnson 21:29, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

It appears that someone with the username C. A. Johnson knows someone named Christopher Amos Johnson personally! What a fluky coincidence. · rodii · 22:36, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

42:Possible questions

Sorry, I didn't abandond it like the template says, I simply was interupted. I've finished it now, so I hopw it looks better. (I'v also moved it, so it is corect in stating that anybody can put there "questions" down)

Shrek 4

This movie doesn't exist and hasn't been announced yet. The article should not exist.

Actually it should exist because IMdB has it on their site as existing at http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0360985/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.163.118.161 (talk • contribs)

The link you provided is about Shrek 4-D and not Shrek 4, I havn't heard anything about Shrek 4, so i think the article shouldn't exist aswell.

Freshprince 12:21, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

Perhaps make it a redirect to Shrek 4-D.

Lord Sunday

I don't think this meets the criteria for a speedy deletion judging by the article for Garth Nix. Perhaps an AfD notice would be better or even Prod. Speedy just seems a bit too quick. Lord Sunday seems to be the title of one of the books in the series that is mentioned, so it would probably be as significant as, for example, Lazarus Long. Dismas|^(talk) 07:40, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Robeks

Whoever started the article wrote it like a classic speedy-delete candidate, but this is actually a chain in SoCal. I tried turning it into a legit stub. Bobak 00:01, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

The Trolls

PLease do not delete this article. It is still under construction. It is about a real band is not fictionall at all. All facts are true.

Maddox knockoffs

It is a offloaded site of knockoffs for the notable webpage The Best Page in the Universe. The content is clearly not patent nonsense, therefore, not a candidate for speedy deletion--Nick Dillinger 03:04, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Dean Radin

This was nominated for deletion last year, but that was based on a misunderstanding. Dean Radin had written on the Talk page that he holds the copyright for the text in the article, and people thought he had started the Wikipedia article. But what he wanted to say was, "Someone copied this text into Wikipedia, but I hold the copyright. Please delete it". --Hob Gadling 13:26, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

• oppose -- I'm not sure that's the case. There have been 3 posts all claiming to be a Dean Radin (see Talk:Dean Radin#Multiple postings claiming to be Dean Radin), and no verification as yet about the subject text. The original text looks like it was copied from a 2004 document that claims "This artikel Dean_Radin is licensed under the GNU free Documentation License. " This wasn't speedied within 48 hours (A8) and is on about 46 mirrors. --William Allen Simpson 15:26, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

[(Phil Brown (Politician))]

This entry provides information for a blank entry that has already been created for my name under the 2004 Canadian federal election results in Ottawa. Similar entries exist for other persons who were candidates in this election. Why would there be a blank page entitled "Phil Brown (Politician)" if the person in question is not able to provide some basic biographical information to identify who he is. It is unreasonable to have a candidates in a blank entry on Wikipedia without at least some information. People looking up candidates in previous elections should be able to find out more about them than just a name and a blank entry.

Dkts

This article has basically no content, it merely expands a rare acronym. LDan 00:14, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Talk:Ball

Just a vulgar sentence from a vandal created today.--Primetime 14:05, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Fayette County Productions

Previously deleted. - CobaltBlueTony 16:27, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Christina Marie Ritter

This page shouldn't be deleted because this actress is on six other sites and that should be enough evidence. She's on IMdB even. I think that the people that keep deleting this page should give ample reasoning for why they feel it's vain,etc. because they delete without discussion. Doing that with other pages(without discussion), will truely make Wikipedia go nowhere in development. As it occured to me just now I thought of the fact that this user has proof, six web pages in fact, yet the deleting users have absolutely none whatsoever...that leads me to believe the deletion is not justified and therefore the proposal should be abolished. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.163.118.161 (talk • contribs)

Subject added to Wikipedia:List of potential subjects. I endorse the deletion. John Reid 07:35, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Note I've corrected the header to refer to the current article tagged for deletion. Subject was already deleted (and protected after recreate) as Christina Ritter. The author seems very determined. Due to the absolute failure to verify any of the credits, it's not clear if subject is an uncredited extra or has never been in front of a camera at all. Doesn't matter. Fan1967 18:34, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Tomas Pecina, Tomáš Pecina and Ignac Pospisil

Again articles about non-notable persons posted by User:Ross.Hedvicek. His similar articles Ross Hedvicek and Vit Zvanovec was deleted --CHeese 21:42, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Charlotte Mason

I don't believe that this page should be deleted. This is a page to fill in an open link from the Homeschooling page. It is designed to fill in information on both the woman and on her educational philosophy which is widely used by the home schooling families. The author will continue to work on it regularly and more information should be up within the week. (Eventually the woman and her philosophy may be split if enough information is compiled.) (Note the author of the page (user:lfinder is a newbie and the writer of this note will be helping her extensively) Naraht 20:10, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

Très.B

Doesn't fit speedy criteria, as notability is asserted through fesitval appearances (Amnesty International) - take it to AFD instead. exolon 22:55, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

I agree. Moved to AfD. Kafziel 01:08, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

PYCO

This article got deleted recently, with no delete vote, in less than 12 hours . This is annoying as it does not allow ppl to add their thoughts on the issue. PYCO is the explanation of an acronym used frequently in many IRC channels. It is just as notable as many other acronyms here on wikipedia, which alert people to the meanings of acronyms they are not familiar with. The terms existence is able to be confirmed by visiting the website, which is included in the wiki page. Several people have added their support for the pages existence. The article is not incoherent, please look up this words definition. It does supply meaningful content or history, if the editor would read the article they may understand this. --Nambio 02:47, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

• This article is complete rubbish. Pictures of a flaccid and an erect penis have no place in the article for a start. Just because a handful of kids may have adopted this acronym on an IRC channel, doesn't mean it has enough notability to warrant an article in an encyclopedia. Delete it, and the sooner, the better. --Mal 03:19, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
• If someone's "thoughts" are about something as profane (and, in my opinion, idiotic) as this PYCO issue, then he or she has much more to worry about than an article being deleted. Delete. -- Kicking222 20:18, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep this deleted, I've used IRC for years and never heard this. And I hang out with a lot of teenagers. Danny Lilithborne 02:26, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Konigun Ninjutsu

This article has been taken over by someone who refuses to let anyone who doesn't agree with his point of view to make lasting edits to the page. Every time someone changes something, he changes it back within the hour. He has created "rules" for the discussion, and routinely edits posts made by other people on the discussion page WITHOUT THEIR CONSENT. The entire article is speculation by people who don't know anything about the topic, and it is all unverifiable. Some of the people in question are in the middle of civil litigation because of their actions on Wikipedia and other internet forums, so the article should at least be deleted until the legal matters are resolved. The entire article is slanderous and false, and the user TrueGamerOmega is almost singlehandedly assuring that it remains so. Myself and several other people have tried again and again to fix the article, even making it represent both points of view, but again and again it gets changed back to only represent TrueGamerOmega's views. It is not his personal page, and it's causing far more grief that it's worth. Delete it. 70.115.79.240 17:13, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Further proof of this. And I quote from the Konigun Ninjutsu discussion page "If this is not explained then I will remove the speedy deletion tag because it means you do not truly believe it should be changed. Remember, BE SPECIFIC!TrueGamerOmega 17:19, 5 April 2006 (UTC)" This user must be stopped! 70.115.79.240 17:40, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Mall walking

The content of this article is not necessary for an encyclopedia. I'd delete it. --24.247.126.44 14:26, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

• Why in the world does this page exist? Delete this crap! -- Kicking222 17:41, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
• Not a speedy candidate, proposed for deletion. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 20:43, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
• It is a recognised form for exercise, with 140,000 hits on Google. The article itself could do with a lot of work though. Markb 20:46, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep this crap! Google confirms validity. --CelticWonder 06:37, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep At least two professional writers have seen fit to write about it (see external links).--Dhodges 15:55, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Ryan May

• WP:AB and probably WP:BIO Orangutan 14:55, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

The Game (game)

This should not be speedy deleted. Despite concerns about the game being unverifiable, a new source much better than all previous sources has been discovered. Furthermore, there is not strong "consensus" about The Game; every AfD debate has been pretty well split, as has the deletion review debate. It may be aggravating to have another debate about the same article, but speedying it would be out of process. Mangojuice 18:11, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Consensus is strongly in favor of deleting as can be proven through AFD and DRV both of which ended with a strong consensus to delete and protect the page as deleted. The page has been restored out of process and is eligible for speedy. Pegasus1138^{Talk | Contribs | Email} ---- 18:17, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

The ruling of Prodego in the 4th AfD was no consensus. There is now a deletion review about the closure decision. DarthVader 12:23, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kangaroo JAck

This was an improperly created AfD deletion proposal and the AfD tag has been deleted from Kangaroo Jack This article is therefore now an orphan. --Strothra 20:09, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Hollywood Undead

Currently tagged for both AfD and speedy deletion. Reposted after deletion (not by me), but repost is different than original. Suggest letting AfD run its course. It's an interesting case, the first big Myspace band. 4 millon hits in Google, yet no airplay. Probably fails WP:BAND, probably passes WP:WEB. --John Nagle 05:44, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Man, I have no idea what to say about that. That's quite the interesting case. You're probably absolutely correct- I'd think they fail band notability but pass Web notability. -- Kicking222 02:33, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Turned out it only had about 200 real hits; the other 4 million were apparently because Myspace advertised it on Myspace, and millions of Myspace pages showed up as a hit. It's in AfD now. --John Nagle 04:59, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

Matt Brash

This article should not be deleted as the subject in question is relevant to the Village life in Stamford Bridge as a TV personallity that is visible to visitors to the village. This article is not self promoting. Instresting to note that within seconds of the page been flagged for speedy delete and me posting the original entry here TigerShark has deleted it. Looking at the deletion log, along with loads of other entries over the last hour or so... not even giving an opportunity to modify/change. The bulk of the text was taken from a site containing no copyright information, the reason given for the deletion 'breach of copyright' !!!

That was a terrible article. The writer failed to get around to mentioning that this guy is a presenter on Zoo Vet at large. Probably should not have been deleted. DJ Clayworth 17:27, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

As the author of the article, the main thing that was not taken into concideration, was the fact that the article was not yet completed, but just deleted regardless.

Wikipedia talk

there is no cumlative page where to access all the Wikipedia talk pages for questions about specific polcies. If there is one, please leave me a message about it. Masssiveego 01:29, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Impatients

Article is meant to be about Impatiens, which already exists. This short article is filled with misinformation. Say bye-bye to it.Stepp-Wulf 03:31, 18 April 2006 (UTC).

JavaScript Namespaces

See Talk:JavaScript Namespaces for reasons for questioning speedy deletion.--Inonit 16:34, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

The Peacocks

This article is completely pointless. See Talk:The Peacocks. Al17 14:41, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Syed Suhaib Ahmad

Created by mistake. Please delete. Siddiqui 17:50, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Holy Fuck

I'm sorry about the name, but please see Talk:Holy Fuck for assertions of notability which are in the process of being added to this article. They're a well-established 18 month old Canadian indie band made up of other notable members. They meet the notability criteria. I'm not sure why an nn assertion wound up in the speedy queue, but I assume it's because of the band name. Jessamyn (talk) 02:12, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

Talk:Give Me Novacaine

It WILL be delete, because, the talk is not involved with the article. Weirdy 05:16, 21 April 2006 (UTC).

Talk:St. Jimmy

There are 3/3 votes that say this article should be deleted/speedy deleted. There are personal attacks and stupidity going on in that page. Weirdy 09:51, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

• I do not quite understand the above as this has just been put to AfD and strongly kept ([9])- it is a TALK PAGE. Page now seems to have been refactored to clean up chatter anyway. Badgerpatrol 02:41, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Jasper Sadubin

This is a real person who founded and writes for Doobi Inc. Publishing. Many of his works are referenced to on wikipedia as shown below!!! Articles such as Admiralty House, Sydney and Theory of Portuguese discovery of Australia are completely based upon Jasper's works. If anyonw wants to see word document manuscript of these works it can be arranged. √αʑʑρεɾ 00:44, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Doobi Inc. Publishing

This is a real firm and many of it's works are referenced to on wikipedia as shown below!!! Articles such as Admiralty House, Sydney and Theory of Portuguese discovery of Australia are completely based upon Jasper's works, published through Doobi Inc. If anyone wants to see a word document manuscript of these works it can be arranged. √αʑʑρεɾ 00:50, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Takashi Kushida

This page should not be deleted. Takashi Kushida is a prominent Japanese Aikidoka, who studied directly under Gozo Shioda. He is the founder of Aikido Yoshokai, an is well respected in the Aikido Yoshokai community, especially in North America. He's still actively teaching Aikido at a dojo in Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Club Penguin

This page should not be deleted because I am still working on it. I was intrupted while writing and had to go off the computer.

Political_Stew

This page should be deleted. I am the author and give my permission for whatever objections there are to be overriden. After suffering continuous page vandalism yesterday, there is now an argument spreading to the discussion of deletion page. Sorry to have troubled you.

Tourette's Guy

This is a worthwhile addition... the site is visited by thousands daily, and monthly downloads are in the thousands of gigabytes.

There's another one, Tourettes Guy. Both have been voted AfD, non-notable. It is a spoof site, low Alexa rank and hits, and since the person doesn't seem to display legitimate Tourette syndrome, it is construed as an attack site by persons with TS. AfD Feb 13 2006 AfD Oct 24 2005 Sandy 22:34, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

I wouldn't call a site that gets nearly a million hits a day "non-notable." And while he may offend some, he has been diagnosed with TS. David Duchovny 22:41, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

The site says he has been diagnosed with TS, but those who know TS see it as a spoof, tics that are faked, and an attack. Sandy 22:45, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Have you paid attention to any of my comments at all? There are TONS more offensive things on Wiki than this. I have TS as well, and it's blatantly obvious he DOES have it. Not to mention it has 13,000+ Google hits, not 500 as someone referenced on a talk page. Regardless of whether it offends you, this is notable enough to have a page here, and to ignore my hard facts is very poor policy. David Duchovny 22:54, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Hey, wait a minute, you're not really David Duchovny. · rodii · 23:45, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Don't see what that has to do with this debate, which is pretty fitting, actually. Seems Wikipedia really is run on the spoils system and controlled by special interests. I don't think I'll be contributing to this project anymore. David Duchovny 04:58, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

I was just kidding--I thought it was obvious you weren't David Duchovny. (Everything else you wrote seems like pretty much a non sequitur to me. Spoils system? Special interests?) · rodii · 18:52, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Yes, because it seems that the only two reasons people don't want an article on this is because it is supposedly "non-notable" (which I have presented evidence against) and that TS activists want it silenced as a "spoof," which doesn't really qualify it for removal. The facts are pretty clear: it IS a notable Internet humor site, and should be included here. David Duchovny 20:22, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not the place to push points of view, either, Sandy. Whether the majority of people agree or disagree with Tourette's Guy is really not relevant to this debate. David Duchovny 07:13, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

You are correct that agreement with the site is not important: what is relevant is that it has been voted an AfD twice, which renders it eligible for speedy deletion. Wikipedia functions based on consensus among editors. I hope you will continue contributing to Wiki. Best regards, Sandy 11:31, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

You are correct. However, I was not a participant in the AfD debate, and brought new, relevant facts to the table, so I see no reason why the discussion should not be reopened. David Duchovny 16:59, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

How do I go about contesting this, as it was deleted before I could put in much input? Templar34 20:59, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

West London Methodist Mission

The article was created on 9 April 2006 as a stub, and remains a stub today. While I agree that it does not contain sufficient information yet in the body of the article (which is why it is a stub, and why I added the {{expert}} element today), I have enhanced the first paragraph with what I hope is sufficient additional importance to prevent deletion. There is no argument that it requires a subject expert to complete the article, but equally it is of sufficient importance to remain as either an item that provides the answers to some research or as a catalyst for further research.

Google returns decent results (76 or so) for a search on "West London Methodist Mission" and more (797 or so), naturally, on "West London Mission". While I agree that this means the article requires expansion, the lack of information in it currently does not make it a candidate for deletion. Rather it argues strongly for retention for an expert hand to add to.

Were this article to have been on a different topic the initial paragraph of importance might have beendeemed sufficient as it was. While I know I am emphasising it, the article is a stub and was listed as such since creation.

Fiddle Faddle 07:04, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Grateful to the admin who declassifed this for speedy deletion and downgraded to a PROD. I have had time now to perform more substantial editing showing importance and also to invite the WLM itself to be the expert editor on this topic, and as a result of all this removed the PROD (which seemed to be within my acceptaed editing even as originator of the article). Fiddle Faddle 10:49, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Ivar Engan

The article seems to be non-notable, and no references are given. The language used is also unencyclopedic. Ronline ✉ 11:55, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Silian Rail

I created this article but I don't see why it's being deleted. There are other bands out there that have wiki pages. Why can't this band have one?

Keith Marlowe

This page just underwent 5 days of discussion about possible deletion. As there was no clear consensus, the delete tag was removed. Now another tag has been added on. I'd ask that this tag, placed by user Ameria idol1972 be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.206.252.156 (talk • contribs)

The problem was that too many people logged out/moved their computer/used a different one to create sockpuppets for both pro- and anti-deletion. To add to that, too many people lacked proper formatting, making it hard to see who voted for what. In keeping with assuming good faith, the admin decided no consensus and kept the article. The AfD talkpage is still there, for the interested. --M1ss1ontomars2k4 23:02, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

P.S. The AfD became a mudslinging, WP:POINT debate. --M1ss1ontomars2k4 23:05, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Kittenhate.com

This page was just created and is about an online community. Given that other communities (facebook, myspace, etc) warrant wikipedia pages i figured this one did as well, although it is much smaller and has been on and off again. I think if you give the article some time it will flesh out quite nicely. Matterson52 03:23, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Alexa Traffic Rank for kittenhate.com: 537,964; Google says: "In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 115 already displayed."; 7 hits on Google groups Amcfreely 03:30, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Darren Jackson

Essentially an empty article. For some unknown reason, it redirected to Colin Calderwood. --Badmotorfinger 21:19, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Junglebuko

please do not delete this article, the band is currently on verbal agreements with a few local record labels, they have also played with famous bands of the phil., they are really well-known in the underground scene.. pls dnt delete..

Nick karpan

I am dissapointed in your wanting to delete this page. Please do not do so.

I am a Karpanist from Spain (moved here from England in the 80s and am visiting a friend in Canada), and I beleive that this page should not be deleted from Wikpedia, because there are a few of us Karpanists, who believe in this information, and by you calling it "nonsense" and by you wanting to "delete the article quickly" you have made a dire mistake. You have offended us.

It is an article of faith in Karpanism to believe in Nick Karpan, and the information listed on this page. It would be nice if you'd expand on the topic. We believe him to be our hero, our savior, and we whole-heartedly believe that he is made of fire, a visible gin, I suppose. Gins are believed in, in many other religions such as islam. Trust me. I was a muslim before i converted to Karpanism.

Although i did not write this article, i am glad the person who did, did. This is a great site, and after stumbling upon the article on Nick Karpan, I now know it is even better.

For your use:

                             AN ARTICLE FROM THE BOOK OF KARPAN

"Thou rested in the machine he built with thou holy hands, and dreamed upon gazing into the wounds of the satanic vampires, he would one day destroy..."

                                                        -Chapter 3, Verse 23

Raiders drum and bugle corps

Article currently a part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Drum Corps, notable as this is a champion corps for a lower division. Drum corps are nonprofit youth performing arts ensembles, I will assert this is not simply a band or organizational vanity article. Mr Bound 13:12, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Anthony Herron

Noob got it wrong. No big deal, but I'm new at this, too. Rklawton 16:22, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

LegACy

I am a Candian amateur band writer and I wish to publish this article on the bands behalf.

See also

• Articles for deletion
• Speedy redirection - Similar to speedy deletion.
• Speedy deletion patrol - for catching errors in deletion without rancor or excessive red tape