Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Brandon (writer): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
cmt |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*'''Keep'''. I've heard of his work, and it's well-reviewed. I think he's notable enough. |
*'''Keep'''. I've heard of his work, and it's well-reviewed. I think he's notable enough. |
||
*'''Comment''' Well, one person that's "heard of his work" does not notability make. Also does nothing to help discussion or debate here. Moreover, there isn't enough coverage on his books to meet WP:BK and wouldn't meet requirements even for a re-direct never mind an article. Although his work has been reviewed, that in itself is nowhere close to enough "qualifications alone" despite these "fairly substantially reviewed" books you mention, it still doesn't clear the hurtle of notability as none of his books meet any of the 5 criteria, for starters...[[User:Jimsteele9999|Jimsteele9999]] ([[User talk:Jimsteele9999|talk]]) 02:42, 26 November 2014 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 02:42, 26 November 2014
- John Brandon (writer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. Fails WP:BLP. Jimsteele9999 (talk) 05:54, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 08:10, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 08:10, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 08:10, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. A quick search shows that his work has been fairly substantially reviewed by the mainstream press, so he would pass under that qualification alone. Some of it is actually heavy enough to warrant articles for some of his books. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:42, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. I've heard of his work, and it's well-reviewed. I think he's notable enough.
- Comment Well, one person that's "heard of his work" does not notability make. Also does nothing to help discussion or debate here. Moreover, there isn't enough coverage on his books to meet WP:BK and wouldn't meet requirements even for a re-direct never mind an article. Although his work has been reviewed, that in itself is nowhere close to enough "qualifications alone" despite these "fairly substantially reviewed" books you mention, it still doesn't clear the hurtle of notability as none of his books meet any of the 5 criteria, for starters...Jimsteele9999 (talk) 02:42, 26 November 2014 (UTC)