Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucknow-Estherton, Pennsylvania: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:16, 12 March 2011

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. kur ykh 00:46, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lucknow-Estherton, Pennsylvania

Article is about two actual places (Estherton, Pennsylvania and Lucknow, Pennsylvania), but merges them into one community for an uncertain reason. There's a claim that they're a census-designated place (CDP) — note that some CDPs are double-barrelled, such as Maple Heights-Lake Desire, Washington — but this isn't a CDP. Look at this Census Bureau map, page 19, where you can see that Dauphin County has no CDP with "Esther"; indeed, such a name doesn't appear in a search of the entire document. Essentially: there's no reason to have this double-place article, and (as we have an article on each of the two communities) no ideal place to redirect it, so it needs deletion. Nyttend (talk) 01:12, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete they are two communities with their own articles, so this article is not needed. Master&Expert (Talk) 02:11, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per New York-New Jersey and France-Germany not being good article subjects.ChildofMidnight (talk) 04:43, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't think that those fall under the criteria for speedy deletion. Nyttend (talk) 12:51, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete BLVUser:Czw217BLV 23:47, 13 November 2008 (UTC) Go ahead and delete. I accidentally hit save wile tying to go back on my browser. Test page.[reply]
Speedy delete please as author-request, per previous comment: I'd do it myself, but I don't want anything to look awkward. Nyttend (talk) 01:08, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 *'''Speedy Delete''' per New York-New Jersey and France-Germany not being good article subjects.[[User:ChildofMidnight|ChildofMidnight]] ([[User talk:ChildofMidnight|talk]]) 04:43, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 **I don't think that those fall under the criteria for speedy deletion.  [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 12:51, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
-*'''Delete''' BLV[[User:Czw217|User:Czw217]]BLV 23:47, 13 November 2008 (UTC) I actually agree, go ahead and delete. I accidentally hit save wile tying to go back on my browser. I actually decided to split it up.
+*'''Delete''' BLV[[User:Czw217|User:Czw217]]BLV 23:47, 13 November 2008 (UTC) Go ahead and delete. I accidentally hit save wile tying to go back on my browser. Test page.
 *'''Speedy delete please as author-request''', per previous comment: I'd do it myself, but I don't want anything to look awkward.  [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 01:08, 14 November 2008 (UTC)