Jump to content

Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2009/Comments/Fred Bauder: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m subst
Radiant! (talk | contribs)
→‎Comments: forwards, not backwards
Line 12: Line 12:
*I am supporting this candidate because I feel they have the necessary qualifications for the position. Examplevoter, 00:01, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
*I am supporting this candidate because I feel they have the necessary qualifications for the position. Examplevoter, 00:01, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
-->
-->
*The ArbCom has made a lot of progress the last two years, and it would run counter to that to reinstate one of the "old guard" like Fred in his position. Wikipedia needs to move forwards, not backwards, and therefore it is time for the new generation to take up the job. [[User_talk:Radiant!|<b><font color="#0000DD">&gt;<font color="#0066FF">R<font color="#0099FF">a<font color="#00CCFF">d<font color="#00EEFF">i</font>a</font>n</font>t</font>&lt;</font></b>]] 00:21, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
*










Revision as of 00:21, 1 December 2009


This is a public page for voters who wish to comment briefly on the candidacy of Fred Bauder or the way they have voted in relation to the candidate. For extended discussion, please use the attached talk page.

Voting in the December 2009 Arbitration Committee elections will be open until 23:59 UTC on 14 December 2009, at which time this page will be archived.

To cast your vote, please go to your personal SecurePoll ballot page. Only votes submitted through the SecurePoll election system will be counted.

Candidate statementQuestions for the candidateComment on the candidateDiscuss the candidate

Comments

  • The ArbCom has made a lot of progress the last two years, and it would run counter to that to reinstate one of the "old guard" like Fred in his position. Wikipedia needs to move forwards, not backwards, and therefore it is time for the new generation to take up the job. >Radiant< 00:21, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]