Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2021 July 10: Difference between revisions
→Super Air Jet: tempundelte |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
* '''Overturn'''. Surely was fixable. If not, it is worth a decision to explain promotion, sources, and [[WP:TNT]]. Looks notable to me. Eg https://simpleflying.com/super-air-jet/. —[[User:SmokeyJoe|SmokeyJoe]] ([[User talk:SmokeyJoe|talk]]) 01:57, 11 July 2021 (UTC) |
* '''Overturn'''. Surely was fixable. If not, it is worth a decision to explain promotion, sources, and [[WP:TNT]]. Looks notable to me. Eg https://simpleflying.com/super-air-jet/. —[[User:SmokeyJoe|SmokeyJoe]] ([[User talk:SmokeyJoe|talk]]) 01:57, 11 July 2021 (UTC) |
||
*This doesn't look like a G11 at all to me. I haven't looked at the sources and I don't know that it would survive an afd - it would at best be at the very bottom threshold of past practice for airlines, with only three planes and only just having begun operations - but it's written neutrally. Overturn. —[[User:Cryptic|Cryptic]] 22:25, 11 July 2021 (UTC) |
*This doesn't look like a G11 at all to me. I haven't looked at the sources and I don't know that it would survive an afd - it would at best be at the very bottom threshold of past practice for airlines, with only three planes and only just having begun operations - but it's written neutrally. Overturn. —[[User:Cryptic|Cryptic]] 22:25, 11 July 2021 (UTC) |
||
*'''Temp undeleted for DRV''' [[User:WilyD|Wily]][[User talk:WilyD|<span style="color:#FF8800">D</span>]] 19:14, 17 July 2021 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 19:15, 17 July 2021
10 July 2021
Super Air Jet
Page deleted unjustified, article not promotional. The article concerns an actual airline that has received an Air Operator's Certificate in Indonesia. The entry explains the foundation of the airline as well as its origins. The deleted article also features the fleet information of the airline that with data summarised from an independent and verified database. The deletion of the page only delays the eventual recreation of the page as it concerns an actual publicly accessibly entity. I have also cited numerous journalistic news sources that have significant reputation in the country. There were very few if any statements which may point to the deleted article being considered promotional. The page summarises the numerous information about the establishment and subsequent launch of the airline available freely for the public to see on various databases and news reports. Raymondeuro (talk) 10:30, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
- Allow Creation of Draft - When an appellant says that an article was not promotional, there are two possible reasons. First, the article was not promotional. Second, the article was promotional, but the author has a bias and doesn't see the promotional nature. Let a reviewer review. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:55, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
- Overturn. Surely was fixable. If not, it is worth a decision to explain promotion, sources, and WP:TNT. Looks notable to me. Eg https://simpleflying.com/super-air-jet/. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:57, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
- This doesn't look like a G11 at all to me. I haven't looked at the sources and I don't know that it would survive an afd - it would at best be at the very bottom threshold of past practice for airlines, with only three planes and only just having begun operations - but it's written neutrally. Overturn. —Cryptic 22:25, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
- Temp undeleted for DRV WilyD 19:14, 17 July 2021 (UTC)