Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2021 March 21: Difference between revisions
→Northwest Post-Grunge: close, G4 overturned, should be sent to AfD |
add missing word |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
! style="background-color: #f2dfce; font-weight:normal; text-align:left;" | |
! style="background-color: #f2dfce; font-weight:normal; text-align:left;" | |
||
* <span class="anchor" id="Northwest Post-Grunge"></span>'''[[:Northwest Post-Grunge]]''' – G4 speedy deletion overturned. This can (should?) be relisted at AfD immediately for a full assessment against the notability criteria. I also note that editors removed the 'temporarily undeleted for DRV' tag over a week ago on this article ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Northwest_Post-Grunge&type=revision&diff=1013819492&oldid=1013575386 diff]), which should not occurred. We as DRV regulars should be more vigilant in monitoring this throughout discussions, and reverting to restore the procedural template where appropriate. [[User:Daniel|Daniel]] ([[User talk:Daniel|talk]]) 10:24, 2 April 2021 (UTC) <!--*--> |
* <span class="anchor" id="Northwest Post-Grunge"></span>'''[[:Northwest Post-Grunge]]''' – G4 speedy deletion overturned. This can (should?) be relisted at AfD immediately for a full assessment against the notability criteria. I also note that editors removed the 'temporarily undeleted for DRV' tag over a week ago on this article ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Northwest_Post-Grunge&type=revision&diff=1013819492&oldid=1013575386 diff]), which should not have occurred. We as DRV regulars should be more vigilant in monitoring this throughout discussions, and reverting to restore the procedural template where appropriate. [[User:Daniel|Daniel]] ([[User talk:Daniel|talk]]) 10:24, 2 April 2021 (UTC) <!--*--> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| style="text-align:center;" | ''The following is an archived debate of the [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]] of the page above. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>'' |
| style="text-align:center;" | ''The following is an archived debate of the [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]] of the page above. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>'' |
Revision as of 10:25, 2 April 2021
Northwest Post-Grunge (closed)
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
The original article was deleted because it used trivial sources. The article was recreated from scratch using those two trivial sources to flesh it out (they were still extremely useful and added good content to the article), but I added a third non-trivial source that expanded the article by adding 4 paragraphs that were non-existent in the original deleted version. Yesterday @John B123: nominated the article for speedy deletion using the criteria that it was identical. They also claimed that they never reviewed the deleted article to compare to see if it was identical. John B123 never supplied additional rationale for deletion and refused to engage in the talk page in any substantial way. Now @TomStar81: has deleted the article per the speedy deletion nomination and claims it was because it was identical-G4 (it was not), the article was dependent upon another article-G8 (also, no), and no credible indication of importance-A7, which states "albums" are exempt (this is an album). The article was deleted on false pretenses. This article should be reinstated and perhaps a tag put on it, that it could be improved with more refs, but not outright deleted. As it is, I feel the article was just fine with three references. Leitmotiv (talk) 00:16, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Further comments. The article has two non-trivial sources, one of which is a direct mention of the album in a book in relation to the time period change from grunge to post-Cobain's death. That's what is tackled in paragraph 1 of the new article, and is expanded upon from the old article. The next two paragraphs revolve around the non-trivial newspaper source Northwest Independent Music News, which I may be able to use to add another small paragraph while citing it. The final paragraph gives some context to the label, the previous release, and the the producer advertising the new comp (the article of discussion). The last is certainly trivial, but it helps flesh the article out a bit - its location at the end of the article's body is probably misplaced. It's still possible I will be able to add another source to this deleted article from a run of newspapers called the WOW Hall notes, as well as the Oregon Daily Emerald. I ask for two things in the review during your consideration: acknowledge the previous deletion was done in error, and if need be put it up for AfD, but speedy deletion was hasty and in error. Second, give me some time to find more sources to cite. I think it can be done. Yes this article has been neglected for some time, but coincidentally I have come into a cache of various publications that are highly useful for encyclopedic sources and I haven't fully digitized them for review and use on Wikipedia. I've also created a new band article for Bogwon (AKA Jolly Mon) which are featured on the album at the same time this article was deleted - which was one of the criticisms of the previous AfD's (essentially too many red links). I may be able to do more with my new resources. In fact, I've made a small goal of creating more articles on the music scene of Oregon from the 90s, and recreating the Elemental Records article that didn't have enough sources before. Leitmotiv (talk) 04:26, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
Draft:Mediacube (closed)
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
Hello. The article was deleted by quick delete (G11). It was also pointed out that the article is not significant. I believe that the article was not advertising, and if there were any shortcomings, then in any case this is not a reason for G11. As for the significance, I cited several sources in the article: dev.by and tut.by (well-known Belarusian publications: Tut.By), as well as vc.ru. Plus, the article has a source for a scientific article by the professor, where he examines the company's income, as well as its activities. Also added a link to Nasha Niva magazine - 1. And I found a book where, on page 370, the activities of the company are discussed. This is the information I managed to get from this source. This is an independent review of the history and activities of the company: an independent review of the history and activities of the company: MediaCube appeared six years ago, when TV producer and art manager Mikhail Bychenok left the Belarusian television, where he had worked since the age of 17 and devoted 10 years to it. Mikhail took the starting capital — 50 thousand dollars — from his father, a businessman in the construction industry. The money went to the equipment, the office and the first salaries of employees. According to Bychenko, there were no other investments: the company produced entertainment video content for ONT, BT, STV, including New Year's shows, made commercials and broadcasts for banks, mobile operators and retailers (one of the major projects — "Luck to Boot" for Eurotrade) and grew at the expense of revenue. Four years ago, the company won a tender to select a regional partner of YouTube in Belarus: the partner had to work with Belarusian authors, solving technical and financial issues. Having won the competition, the company became MCN (Multi-Channel Network) — one of about 300 organizations that provide assistance in managing channels on video platforms. Among them are Russian Yoola, Ukrainian Air, Canadian BroadbandTV, American Fullscreen, etc. Having received the MCN status, MediaCube entered the global market. MediaCube has more than 1,000 partner authors. About 50% are from the CIS countries (including about 100 partners from Belarus), the second largest market is Latin America. Among the clients of the Belarusian MCN YouTube-bloggers Vlad Paper (A4), Dima Maslennikov, Pleasant Ildar, Egor Creed, Sergey Lazarev. The total audience of all authors is more than 200 million people. Legally, MediaCube today is a holding company with the Belarusian parent company EmCiEn Global LLC (HTP resident, subject of the transaction with Zubr Capital) and five "daughters" - Belarusian Media Cube Production LLC and FotoVideoPro LLC, Russian Mediacube LLC, as well as Cyprus and Canada MediaCube. The sole owner of all legal entities until recently was Mikhail Bychenok, now the owners of the parent company are also listed as "Zubr Capital". MediaCube employs about 100 people, including about 10 developers, and the rest of the staff provides technical support, works with bloggers, sells, and makes content. Video products account for 10% of the revenue structure (annual revenue-from $ 10 million a year), the main part of the money comes from MCN. Gadagasu (talk) 13:22, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Robert McClenon (talk) 21:07, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |