Jump to content

Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 50: Line 50:
*'''Support''' in the news, decent article. Highly developed countries with strictly enforced building codes have lower death tolls but that doesn't lessen the notability of the event. --[[User:LaserLegs|LaserLegs]] ([[User talk:LaserLegs|talk]]) 23:47, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
*'''Support''' in the news, decent article. Highly developed countries with strictly enforced building codes have lower death tolls but that doesn't lessen the notability of the event. --[[User:LaserLegs|LaserLegs]] ([[User talk:LaserLegs|talk]]) 23:47, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
*:How do we measure the impact of the event if not by its death and destruction? ''<small>[[User_talk:GreatCaesarsGhost|<span style="color:#938f8d">GreatCaesarsGhost</span>]]</small>'' 12:40, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
*:How do we measure the impact of the event if not by its death and destruction? ''<small>[[User_talk:GreatCaesarsGhost|<span style="color:#938f8d">GreatCaesarsGhost</span>]]</small>'' 12:40, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
*::Geographic area, intensity (and frequency of occurrence at that intensity), economic impact, people impacted but not killed, coverage in the news of course and article quality are the most important and that's just what I came up with on short notice. Decrepit shit hole countries always have higher death tolls because even in 2020 they seem either unable or unwilling to organize themselves into a civilized society so that even a routine weather event turns a denuded hillside into a slurry and tragically kills a dozen people living in a tin hut next to a river bank and we lose our minds and post these stubby, inevitably orphaned articles to the main page. --[[User:LaserLegs|LaserLegs]] ([[User talk:LaserLegs|talk]]) 12:58, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
*'''Support''' The equivalent of a Category 3 hurricane. Highly unusual event. -- [[User:King of Hearts|<b style="color:red">King of ♥</b>]][[User talk:King of Hearts|<b style="color:red"> ♦</b>]][[Special:Contributions/King of Hearts|<b style="color:black"> ♣</b>]][[Special:EmailUser/King of Hearts|<b style="color:black"> ♠</b>]] 23:56, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
*'''Support''' The equivalent of a Category 3 hurricane. Highly unusual event. -- [[User:King of Hearts|<b style="color:red">King of ♥</b>]][[User talk:King of Hearts|<b style="color:red"> ♦</b>]][[Special:Contributions/King of Hearts|<b style="color:black"> ♣</b>]][[Special:EmailUser/King of Hearts|<b style="color:black"> ♠</b>]] 23:56, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' Doesn’t seem to be getting front-page coverage on US news websites. '''[[User:Bzweebl|<font color="#D60047">B</font><font color="#F0A000">zw</font><font color="#00A300">ee</font><font color="#0A47FF">bl</font>]]''' ([[User talk:Bzweebl|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Bzweebl|contribs]]) 00:02, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' Doesn’t seem to be getting front-page coverage on US news websites. '''[[User:Bzweebl|<font color="#D60047">B</font><font color="#F0A000">zw</font><font color="#00A300">ee</font><font color="#0A47FF">bl</font>]]''' ([[User talk:Bzweebl|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Bzweebl|contribs]]) 00:02, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:58, 12 August 2020

This page provides a place to discuss new items for inclusion on In the news (ITN), a protected template on the Main Page (see past items in the ITN archives). Do not report errors in ITN items that are already on the Main Page here— discuss those at the relevant section of WP:ERRORS.

This candidates page is integrated with the daily pages of Portal:Current events. A light green header appears under each daily section - it includes transcluded Portal:Current events items for that day. You can discuss ITN candidates under the header.

Srettha Thavisin in December 2023
Srettha Thavisin

Glossary

  • Blurbs are one-sentence summaries of the news story.
    • Altblurbs, labelled alt1, alt2, etc., are alternative suggestions to cover the same story.
    • A target article, bolded in text, is the focus of the story. Each blurb must have at least one such article, but you may also link non-target articles.
  • Articles in the Ongoing line describe events getting continuous coverage.
  • The Recent deaths (RD) line includes any living thing whose death was recently announced. Consensus may decide to create a blurb for a recent death.

All articles linked in the ITN template must pass our standards of review. They should be up-to-date, demonstrate relevance via good sourcing and have at least an acceptable quality.

Nomination steps

  • Make sure the item you want to nominate has an article that meets our minimum requirements and contains reliable coverage of a current event you want to create a blurb about. We will not post about events described in an article that fails our quality standards.
  • Find the correct section below for the date of the event (not the date nominated). Do not add sections for new dates manually - a bot does that for us each day at midnight (UTC).
  • Create a level 4 header with the article name (==== Your article here ====). Add (RD) or (Ongoing) if appropriate.
Then paste the {{ITN candidate}} template with its parameters and fill them in. The news source should be reliable, support your nomination and be in the article. Write your blurb in simple present tense. Below the template, briefly explain why we should post that event. After that, save your edit. Your nomination is ready!
  • You may add {{ITN note}} to the target article's talk page to let editors know about your nomination.

The better your article's quality, the better it covers the event and the wider its perceived significance (see WP:ITNSIGNIF for details), the better your chances of getting the blurb posted.

Purge this page to update the cache

Headers

  • When the article is ready, updated and there is consensus to post, you can mark the item as (Ready). Remove that wording if you feel the article fails any of these necessary criteria.
  • Admins should always separately verify whether these criteria are met before posting blurbs marked (Ready). For more guidance, check WP:ITN/A.
    • If satisfied, change the header to (Posted).
    • Where there is no consensus, or the article's quality remains poor, change the header to (Closed) or (Not posted).
    • Sometimes, editors ask to retract an already-posted nomination because of a fundamental error or because consensus changed. If you feel the community supports this, remove the item and mark the item as (Pulled).

Voicing an opinion on an item

Format your comment to contain "support" or "oppose", and include a rationale for your choice. In particular, address the notability of the event, the quality of the article, and whether it has been updated.

Please do...

  1. Pick an older item to review near the bottom of this page, before the eligibility runs out and the item scrolls off the page and gets abandoned in the archive, unused and forgotten.
  2. Review an item even if it has already been reviewed by another user. You may be the first to spot a problem, or the first to confirm that an identified problem was fixed. Piling on the list of "support!" votes will help administrators see what is ready to be posted on the Main Page.
  3. Tell about problems in articles if you see them. Be bold and fix them yourself if you know how, or tell others if it's not possible.

Please do not...

  1. Add simple "support!" or "oppose!" votes without including your reasons. Similarly, curt replies such as "who?", "meh", or "duh!" are not helpful. A vote without reasoning means little for us, please elaborate yourself.
  2. Oppose an item just because the event is only relating to a single country, or failing to relate to one. We post a lot of such content, so these comments are generally unproductive.
  3. Accuse other editors of supporting, opposing or nominating due to a personal bias (such as ethnocentrism). We at ITN do not handle conflicts of interest.
  4. Comment on a story without first reading the relevant article(s).
  5. Oppose a recurring item here because you disagree with the recurring items criteria. Discuss them here.
  6. Use ITN as a forum for your own political or personal beliefs. Such comments are irrelevant to the outcome and are potentially disruptive.

Suggesting updates

There are two places where you can request corrections to posted items:

  • Anything that does not change the intent of the blurb (spelling, grammar, markup issues, updating death tolls etc.) should be discussed at WP:Errors.
  • Discuss major changes in the blurb's intent or very complex updates as part of the current ITNC nomination.
Skip to top
Skip to bottom

Archives

August 12

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy
Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Science and technology

Sports

August 11

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Health and environment

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Science and technology

Sports

RD: Trini Lopez

Article: Trini Lopez (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Associated Press; The New York Times
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: If I Had a Hammer singer (or at least one of them) and Dirty Dozen actor. COVID-19 CoatCheck (talk) 01:46, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020 Midwest derecho

Proposed image
Article: August 2020 Midwest derecho (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ A rare derecho storm causes widespread damage and affects millions in the Midwestern United States. (Post)
News source(s): The Weather Channel (1)(2); Associated Press (1)(2);The Washington Post
Credits:

Nominator's comments: Large-scale, newsworthy natural disaster caused by rare type of wind storm (derecho). Sources compare damage to hurricane winds, of which the storm's peak matched in wind speed. Gwen Hope (talk) (contrib) 22:04, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose A large tree fell down and crushed half a Subaru across the street from me (in Chicago) due to this. However, this does seem parochial overall. – John M Wolfson (talkcontribs) 22:06, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    John M Wolfson, I'm confused how a massive multi-state weather event which left millions with utility outages, spawned five tornadoes, and destroyed roughly 1/3 of the crops on Iowa's agricultural land is "parochial" Gwen Hope (talk) (contrib) 23:35, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    It's parochial in that it does not appear to have much significance outside of the United States; while that's not fatal to the nomination per the "please do not..." section, there appear to be thankfully zero deaths so far and little long-term impact, so I don't think this suitable for the Main Page. (We also didn't post Hurricane Isaias, another storm doing storm things that was otherwise transitory.) – John M Wolfson (talkcontribs) 23:41, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    John M Wolfson, indeed, the deaths are minimal (only two confirmed so far, mass injuries, however). Regardless I think it could be useful additionally considering these storm types are relatively rare, especially ones that last this long and get this big. However it doesn't really fit a WP:DYK type. Gwen Hope (talk) (contrib) 23:44, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support in the news, decent article. Highly developed countries with strictly enforced building codes have lower death tolls but that doesn't lessen the notability of the event. --LaserLegs (talk) 23:47, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    How do we measure the impact of the event if not by its death and destruction? GreatCaesarsGhost 12:40, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Geographic area, intensity (and frequency of occurrence at that intensity), economic impact, people impacted but not killed, coverage in the news of course and article quality are the most important and that's just what I came up with on short notice. Decrepit shit hole countries always have higher death tolls because even in 2020 they seem either unable or unwilling to organize themselves into a civilized society so that even a routine weather event turns a denuded hillside into a slurry and tragically kills a dozen people living in a tin hut next to a river bank and we lose our minds and post these stubby, inevitably orphaned articles to the main page. --LaserLegs (talk) 12:58, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support The equivalent of a Category 3 hurricane. Highly unusual event. -- King of ♥ 23:56, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Doesn’t seem to be getting front-page coverage on US news websites. Bzweebl (talkcontribs) 00:02, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose I got smacked by a freak derecho once. It was weird and crappy, I survived in an average house and to this day, I still find myself telling people who weren't there how weird and crappy it was. In other words, local story; maybe a legend in time, but never a blurb. InedibleHulk (talk) 04:18, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That said, this one is weirder and crappier than mine, on account of the dead or missing cornfields. InedibleHulk (talk) 04:25, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Ceres

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Proposed image
Article: Ceres (dwarf planet) (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Analysis of the Dawn fly-by of the dwarf planet Ceres (pictured) establishes that it is an ocean world. (Post)
News source(s): Guardian; Nature Astronomy; Reuters
Credits:

Article needs updating
Nominator's comments: The story should be taken with a pinch of salt as there's the usual hype about the prospects of finding life but Nature are making a big splash by publishing seven papers. If we don't list such missions when they launch, we should give them some attention when the results are analysed and reported. The Ceres article seems to need updating but it's a former featured article and vital so I'm not rushing at it. Andrew🐉(talk) 09:43, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Conditional support If as big as it seems. News still seems fuzzy here. Kingsif (talk) 10:33, 11 August 2020 (UTC) Oppose per MG Kingsif (talk) 14:53, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Conditional support - I have to agree with Kingsif here.BabbaQ (talk) 11:50, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Conditional support per all. A cursory glance of the article (via Ctrl-Fing "ocean") doesn't mention it AFAICT, much less explain its significance. – John M Wolfson (talkcontribs) 11:59, 11 August 2020 (UTC) Oppose per MG. I knew it didn't look like an ocean world. – John M Wolfson (talkcontribs) 12:28, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. I'm close to having a CoI here, but will comment anyway. Ceres has long been known to have active geology and subsurface brines, which are responsible for the surface salt deposits and cryovolcanism, both known since 2016. These latest results fill in some of the details, but Ceres having ocean-level amounts of water is not a new discovery. It's also not really an ocean, but a layer of rock which is saturated with brine, so the blurb is misleading (it wasn't a Flyby either). None of the papers were important enough to publish in Nature itself, just three subsidiary journals owned by the same publisher. The source linked to above is from Nature Astronomy, not Nature, and is over-selling the importance because it's advertising work published in the same journal. Finally, the results are so confirmatory that the article itself has received no update whatsoever. Modest Genius talk 12:06, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It's really a good thing we have actual scientists here who can let us know when we're falling prey to pop science journalism.--WaltCip-(BLM!Resist The Orange One) 12:18, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
ITN nominations about Ceres/Dawn
Year Status Blurb
2007 Posted The NASA spacecraft Dawn is launched on a mission to explore mainbelt asteroid Vesta and dwarf planet Ceres.
2012 Posted Dawn leaves Vesta
2014 Posted The dwarf planet Ceres is observed to be releasing water vapor.
2015 Posted NASA's Dawn spacecraft enters the orbit of the dwarf planet Ceres.
2017 No consensus Scientists report the detection of aliphatic organic compounds on dwarf planet Ceres.
So, no results since Dawn arrived at Ceres. Andrew🐉(talk) 15:03, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Let's wait until Elon arrives on Ceres. – Sca (talk) 15:34, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm waiting for The Boat Race on Ceres. Howard the Duck (talk) 15:38, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Zero gravity rowing klaxon!!!!!!! --LaserLegs (talk) 15:40, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Based on how difficult it is to complete 18 to 20 minutes of rowing on the Thames, perhaps "zero gravity" (which of course it wouldn't be zero) is the way ahead. O';;l suggest it. The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 22:43, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Coincidentally, I had a dream about hydrohalite last night. It was terrifying. – Sca (talk) 21:34, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Closed) Gam-COVID-Vac

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Gam-COVID-Vac (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The Russian Gam-COVID-Vac becomes the first registered vaccine against COVID-19. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ Russia registers first COVID-19 vaccine — which will be called ‘Sputnik V’ in foreign markets.
News source(s): [1] (USA Today); [2] (The Boston Globe); [3] (Süddeutsche Zeitung); [4] (The Globe and Mail); [5] (Ouest-France); [6] (Il Gazzettino); [7] (Firstpost); [8] (Anadolu Agency); [9] (Rbc.ru); [10] (Interfax); [11] (Vedomosti); [12] (TASS)
Credits:
Nominator's comments: The first vaccine against COVID-19. Александр Мотин (talk) 10:31, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NOTFORUM.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
...yes, because clearly any country outside the US or UK is incapable of creating vaccines.Albertaont (talk) 14:05, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Albertaont: The country which chose the President for the US people is much more capable of creating vaccines.--Александр Мотин (talk) 16:13, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Holy shit, he actually believes this article! Look at him! Look at him and laugh! --212.74.201.229 (talk) 18:25, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

August 10

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents
Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Sports

(Posted) RD: P. J. Sheehan

Article: P. J. Sheehan (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Irish Times; Irish Independent
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Bloom6132 (talk) 08:44, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Bumped) Lebanese government resigns

Articles: 2020 Beirut explosions (talk · history · tag) and Hassan Diab (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The Lebanese government, including Prime Minister Hassan Diab, resign after the explosion in Beirut that killed over 200 people. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ The Lebanese government led by Prime Minister Hassan Diab resigns after protests, hyperinflation, and the explosion in Beirut
News source(s): BBC
Credits:

Both articles updated

Nominator's comments: Pretty self explanatory, but Diab's speech was an amazing acknowledgement of corruption and giving over to the will of protesters. Kingsif (talk) 18:04, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak oppose for now. The Hassan Diab article contains only a single sentence that says he resigned, and says nothing about his cabinet. I'm fine bumping the blurb and adding more information, but as yet the various Wikipedia articles you are highlighting are very light on relevant information and will need some expanding before we tell people they should read them. --Jayron32 18:08, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Bump This is a continuation of the existing blurb about the explosion. So, just update that blurb and bump it. Andrew🐉(talk) 20:29, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Question Didn't the hyperinflation also impact the decision? – John M Wolfson (talkcontribs) 20:47, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • another question. Is the government really the government? I read somewhere that the political leaders just report to some more powerful people behind the scenes, which was the same people before and after the "revolution" last year. Is that true? If so, we should probably nuance the hook accordingly. Apologies, by knowledge of the full situation is incomplete. Cheers  — Amakuru (talk) 20:51, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Every short-term government overlaps with longer-lasting lobbyists, priests, tribal leaders, bankers, generals, corporate officers and organized crime bosses. But "really" rarely matters here. The titleholders "rule". InedibleHulk (talk) 23:13, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2020 PGA Championship

Article: 2020 PGA Championship (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ In golf, Collin Morikawa wins the PGA Championship for his first career major championship. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ In golf, Collin Morikawa wins the PGA Championship for his first career major.
News source(s): Golf Digest ESPN
Article updated
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: Major championship in golf, fits with ITN:Recurring items criteria. Compy90🐉(talk) 10:04, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose for now on quality. I don't particularly agree with the general objection Andrew makes about the tone of the article - a golfing article would be expected to use golfing terminology. Birdie and Eagle are not jargon because many people such as myself, who don't play golf, nonetheless know what they mean. And the relevant articles are linked, for those who don't know the terminology. Our guidelines suggest targeting articles to those familiar with, but not necessarily expert in, a given subject. But a couple of Andrew's objections are valid. (1) The "Field" section is far too long and detailed, interrupting the flow of the article. It probably belongs in a subpage, with just a brief summary of how the field was chosen, and a few principal players, given here. And (2) the point about spectators clearly is an error, because Curry was a spectator. He wasn't there in any capacity other than to watch the golf. It sounds like that point needs to be nuanced. ITN articles don't have to be GA standard certainly, but they must still conform to basic structural norms. With a bit of tidying up this would be ready to go though.  — Amakuru (talk) 04:46, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • That is how all golf tournament articles are written. The place to challenge that practice is probably at WP:GOLF, not here. It shouldn't be valid to oppose this because of an objection to the way golf tournament articles, which have been posted at ITN many times before without objection, are written on Wikipedia. Regarding your second point, reliable sources reported that there were no spectators. Curry was apparently there as a "guest reporter".[14] Bzweebl (talkcontribs) 06:07, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    (edit conflict) I have no intention of challenging anything at WP:GOLF. WikiProjects don't define the basic rules for article structure, that's the job of the MOS, and it applies everywhere. As an aside, I've checked the stats for golf articles and it lists only two articles as FAs (one of which is Wii Sports, only loosely connected to golf) and nine GAs. There are no tournament pages included in those so we have no point of reference. The figures seem astonishly low for such a prominent subject, and suggest the project may not be very active...  — Amakuru (talk) 06:39, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I wasn't sure what "birdie" and "eagle" mean and so just had to look them up. And I bet if you asked the general public what "bogey" means in golf, you'd get a variety of amusing answers with "don't know" being a strong contender. A "hole-in-one" might be ok because it is self-explanatory but note that the phrase isn't used in the article even though there was at least one. Andrew🐉(talk) 09:09, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • The lead should be accessible, but those terms are in the body. A sports event article should not be expected to teach a newbie about the sport. Linking to common technical terms is generally sufficient.—Bagumba (talk) 11:31, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Switching to support - Following a productive discussion, and new edits by Wjemather, the Field section has now been rewritten to contain just prose, with the other info in a linked child info. My concerns are therefore now addressed, and I am switching to support on this candidate. Thanks  — Amakuru (talk) 12:37, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

*Oppose On article quality and prose. Gotitbro (talk) 05:56, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Appears fine or ITN now. Gotitbro (talk) 22:03, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Gotitbro: Yep, the updated version at the time you wrote this would have been fine, but unfortunately that improvement was reverted so it's now back at the unwieldy poor quality version.  — Amakuru (talk) 05:48, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose The "Field" section is unwieldy, and the bolding with linking is an eyesore. This isn't GA, but it's a large-scale failing of MOS:PSEUDOHEAD: Do not make pseudo-headings by abusing semicolon markup (reserved for description lists) and try to avoid using bold markup. It's screaming to be a table with minutiae moved to footnotes.—Bagumba (talk) 06:30, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per Bagumba. And the summaries for the first three rounds don't really pass muster. The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 07:59, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Seems like some here are trying to push the bar too high. The tone and style may be wanting, and the layout may not be ideal, however this meets the basic quality criteria for ITN – "Articles are held to a minimum standard of quality. Articles should be a minimally comprehensive overview of the subject, not omitting any major items." wjematherplease leave a message... 11:59, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Entirely agree. Not sure why this article has attracted so many pile-on opposes when it's no worse than many other ITN/R sports items we've routinely posted. I thought the standard was sufficiently referenced with prose summaries.-- P-K3 (talk) 13:44, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Nope. Basic compliance with the MOS is also up there. We're showcasing this on the main page of our project, let's at the very least showcase the way articles are actually structured, rather than some bizarre format developed within one project and seemingly copied every year because nobody can think of anything better to do. As ever on this page, if people just made some basic changes, like those proposed by Bagumba above, this could just go straight up.  — Amakuru (talk) 19:45, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    We posted both the Masters and the US Open last year which used an identical format. To suddenly declare that what was acceptable before is now unacceptable smacks of moving the goalposts for me. (Sorry, can't think of an equivalent golfing metaphor.) P-K3 (talk) 21:30, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Seems raising the bar without prior discussion or consensus to do so. I'm struggling to find the passage in the ITN criteria which mentions MOS compliance and to what degree it is necessary. For information, it actually quite closely replicates the format used by the major championships themselves for many years, and is to a degree still used by the USGA & R&A, so attacks on the project in this regard are somewhat unwarranted. wjematherplease leave a message... 22:29, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I have edited the field section in accordance with the criticisms and suggestions of Amakuru, Bagumba, Gotitbro, and The Rambling Man above. Let me know if you have any further objections and I would be happy to work on fixing them. Bzweebl (talkcontribs) 22:01, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Reverted due to making the information much less accessible and also losing several details. Changes in this regard would be better discussed centrally (suggest WT:GOLF), as there are many tournament articles with the same mos/formatting issues (as noted above). wjematherplease leave a message... 22:16, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    I've gotten myself involved in enough inane discussions here lately, I'm not interested in starting a new one over formatting at WT:GOLF. I guess this is the end of golf at ITN unless someone else wants to start working on changing this. Bzweebl (talkcontribs) 22:24, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    We shouldn't sacrifice content on the alter of MOS. It does no service to the encyclopedia. There are many ways of removing the bolding without losing content and accessibility/readability – your solution (moving most content – some would say the most important details – into footnotes) was not one of them. wjematherplease leave a message... 22:56, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    I reasoned that was what everyone objecting here wanted since Bagumba suggested it and most other opposes were on similar grounds. Bzweebl (talkcontribs) 23:09, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    I think calling a section on the field "most content" and even "most important" is really a far stretch, I would say most people which would access this article from the front page would be interested in how the tournament actually played out, which is behind 3 full pages of rather trivial information for a non golf enthusiast. This big section actually hurts the readability. Chaosquo (talk) 07:12, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    It shouldn't need spelling out, but I was obviously referring only to the content of that section. Misuse of footnotes is worse than perceived MOS transgressions. People are welcome to discuss ways of presenting the information better, in collaboration with the editors who do the bulk of the work in this area, but sadly it seems none here are willing (discussion started here). wjematherplease leave a message... 09:17, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    The topic under consideration is the 2020 PGA Tournament, and it should be clear by now from the number of objecters here, that the format of that article simply doesn't conform to Wikipedia guidelines on how to structure an article. I am happy to have a conversation about the details of this page, with a view to getting it listed at ITN, since that's the goal here. We can have that by WP:BOLDly trying different layouts on the page (which both Bzweebl and myself have now done), discussing it at the talk page, and coming up with a sensible compromise. But the starting point has to be that the previous format was not of sufficient quality, since multiple experienced editors have now made that same point here on this page. If we come up with a sensible way to present the info, then no doubt WikiProject Golf can incorporate that into their guidelines going forward, but non-members of that project are not bound by any edicts coming from "those who do the bulk of the work in this area", nor are those editors exempt from following the basic MOS guidelines. Cheers  — Amakuru (talk) 09:44, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    The suggestion was only to engage with the golf project; that way when a format is agreed upon, past and future articles will likely follow the same standards (as it is those active project editors who will likely do the bulk of any remedial work). Otherwise we end up with this article and maybe a handful others being "fixed" and the rest not. wjematherplease leave a message... 10:07, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, sure, engaging with the golf regulars, including yourself, is vital and no doubt they will also have good ideas about how to go forward. The more voices the better. I just think that in the immediate term, we should concentrate on the 2020 PGA as a concrete example that we can work on, hopefully with a view to getting it posted on ITN. If we try to fix everything at once, we won't have time for this one to be featured.  — Amakuru (talk) 10:17, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. There have been numerous heavy changes to the article, but the current version seems fine to me. The information is there, the rounds have brief-but-adequate prose summaries, and referencing appears sufficient. Modest Genius talk 11:08, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose I don't feel comfortable thrusting to the main page an article wherein an edit war is taking place.--WaltCip-(BLM!Resist The Orange One) 11:48, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Indian coal mine auction

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Articles: Coal in India (talk · history · tag) and Hasdeo Arand (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Development of 40 new coal mines in India threatens the virgin forest of Hasdeo Arand. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ The indigenous virgin forest people of Hasdeo Arand feel threatened by the development of forty new coal mines in India.
News source(s): The Guardian
Credits:

Article updated
Nominator's comments: As we're focussing on India, it is interesting to see what else is happening there. Modi isn't just building a triumphal new temple; he's planning to make India into "the world’s largest exporter of coal". Elsewhere, we have record summer temperatures but global warming isn't really news now, is it? Coalgate has been a scandal in India for a while and the focus of the current story now seems to be the threat to this virgin forest and its indigeneous people. The article about it is new and so perhaps needs expansion. We should move quickly because, if we wait, the forest won't be there any more. Andrew🐉(talk) 08:42, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Notability? The other Indian stories which we are featuring are a hotel fire, a religious photo op and a plane skidding into a ditch. Which story is really significant? Andrew🐉(talk) 10:16, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Who needs hotel fires when you've got all that cheap Indian coal? Martinevans123 (talk) 11:39, 10 August 2020 (UTC) [reply]
Oppose ...and if my grandmother had wheels, she’d be a bicycle. GreatCaesarsGhost 14:44, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • The auctions for 41 blocks of land are currently running and the bid deadline was August 18. That's why it's in the news now. But by all means wait until the land is strip-mined and the coal is burnt. In the meantime, let's play more golf, shall we? Andrew🐉(talk) 20:11, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Protests posted) Belarusian election

Proposed image
Articles: 2020 Belarusian presidential election (talk · history · tag) and 2020 Belarusian protests (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Incumbent President of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko (pictured) claims victory in a presidential election considered not free or fair by election observers amid pro-democracy protests. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ Belarus cracks down on pro-democracy protests as incumbent President of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko (pictured) claims victory in a presidential election considered not free or fair by election observers.
Alternative blurb II: ​ Belarus cracks down on pro-democracy protests as President of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko claims victory in a presidential election amid claims of electoral fraud.
Alternative blurb III: ​ In Belarus, President Alexander Lukashenko claims victory in a presidential election amid pro-democracy protests and claims of electoral fraud.
Alternative blurb IV: ​ In Belarus, Protests follow the contested re-election of President Alexander Lukashenko.
Alternative blurb V: ​ Incumbent President of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko (pictured) wins a presidential election amid protests and claims of electoral fraud.
News source(s): Guardian, BBC, AP, Reuters
Credits:

Both articles updated
One or both nominated events are listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: Assuming this is ITN/R, as a national election, but the election is so widely considered a sham that the protests surrounding it are the bigger story. Smurrayinchester 08:56, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How about Alt4, offered above? Short & to the pt. – Sca (talk) 15:13, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 9

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

Law and crime
  • A 17-year-old Chili's hostess is hospitalized after being attacked at a Chili's restaurant in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, after telling a large group of women that they may not share a table due to safety regulations regarding the coronavirus. The hostess has no plans to return to the Chili's restaurant where she was attacked. (MSN)

Politics and elections

(Posted) RD: Martin Birch

Article: Martin Birch (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC News; The Guardian; The Independent
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Bloom6132 (talk) 17:13, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment. Generally all fine, but the discography section contains a cite to discogs which, looking at the RS noticeboard archives, is not considered suitable for citations, only external links. Please could you make sure every entry in the list is verifiable by one or more of the non discogs sources?  — Amakuru (talk) 21:06, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Kamala

Article: Kamala (wrestler) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [18][19]
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 GreatCaesarsGhost 01:10, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - Is there a policy / convention on using stage names vs real names in the RD section? Seems like this post should be referenced as James Harris. But, is there a precedent in this group to use stage names? Regards. Ktin (talk) 02:12, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Where he worked and with whom those four years is in his Cagematch profile (External links), if anyone's feeling citey. Click the Career or Matches buttons. I can't paste links, or I might. InedibleHulk (talk) 05:37, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This is not about being "citey" (whatever that means). It's about following one of our most important policies.These cite tags need to be resolved before posting this. I have amended my comment to make it more clear. – Ammarpad (talk) 06:15, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Feeling citey just means "wanting to cite". Cagematch is considered reliable for results. Resolution's pretty easy. InedibleHulk (talk) 06:34, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You literally just made that up. Spman (talk) 12:57, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Only the first part. InedibleHulk (talk) 20:16, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I see you added those tags about a minute after I called "ready", so I stand by it; it was ready at the time. InedibleHulk (talk) 06:07, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The artist known as "Prince" got a blurb in 2016, no formal address, around the time Chyna got RDed. InedibleHulk (talk) 06:39, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You've got the wrong guy, I tell ya! InedibleHulk (talk) 10:31, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I see one, about why his WrestleMania match was scrapped. Nobody should care. ITN is rigged against wrestlers. InedibleHulk (talk) 20:16, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sheesh... and they don't even carry guns. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:19, 10 August 2020 (UTC) [reply]
I'll put in some cite tags. Does placing a reference at the end of the paragraph mean it's verifying every sentence within the paragraph? It's not clear.-- P-K3 (talk) 20:18, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I usually never use that trick when trying to get an article rapidly posted at WP:ITN/RD. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:27, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It's not a trick, they cover everything, have for years. Staleness is coming. Hulk is dead! InedibleHulk (talk) 20:30, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
They may well cover everything, but in my experience putting multiple links at the end of a paragraph with nothing on the individual lines, makes it very difficult to actually verify the facts. It's somewhat better than just listing all sources at the end of the article, like the old days of Wikipedia, but it's a step in that direction, and I definitely think it's best to be more specific on individual lines. If all the cites cover all the facts, then scatter them around a bit. If some cover some facts and others others, then that's easy. Just put them against the correct ones.  — Amakuru (talk) 21:16, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
(I'm very surprised there is not clear MoS policy on this. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:23, 10 August 2020 (UTC))[reply]
Easy if you can highlight, click, drag and all that luxury. Typing for me is like entering a Nintendo password. Nobody who read his article in life complained about clumps. InedibleHulk (talk) 22:19, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Because nobody read his article until he died. The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 23:25, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Kurt Luedtke

Article: Kurt Luedtke (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Detroit Free Press; The Detroit News
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Bloom6132 (talk) 23:17, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) 2020 Vijayawada fire

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 2020 Vijayawada fire (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ At least eleven people are dead and 22 are injured in a fire at a COVID-19 facility centre in India's Andhra Pradesh. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ At least eleven people are dead in Vijayawada due to a fire in Hotel Swarna Palace.
News source(s): Al Jazeera, BBC, AP, Reuters
Credits:

Article updated
Nominator's comments: Sorry guys, this fire is incident has a wide coverage than the 2020 Czech Republic apartment fire. Abishe (talk) 16:31, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Closed) 2020 Bohumín apartment fire

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 2020 Bohumín apartment fire (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ At least eleven people are dead and ten are injured in a fire at an apartment in Bohumín, Czech Republic. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ At least eleven people are dead and ten are injured in a burning apartment in Bohumín, Czech Republic.
Alternative blurb II: ​ At least eleven people are dead and ten are injured in an apparent arson attack in Bohumín, Czech Republic.
News source(s): BBC, Euronews
Credits:

Article updated
Nominator's comments: The fire incident is regarded as the worst ever fire accident in the history of Czech Republic according to the sources. I know there was another article related to 2020 Punjab alcohol poisoning which killed over 100 people didn't get an inclusion in the ITN section. Abishe (talk) 05:04, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

August 8

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Sports

(Posted to RD) RD: Erich Gruenberg

Article: Erich Gruenberg (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Strad
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Iconic violinist, born in Vienna, studied in Israel, then for life in London, played the Moscow premiere of Britten's concerto, and with The Beatles. The article was practically in place, but - so far - undersourced. - I need to go now. There's more in sources if you want to add. Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:11, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Pere Casaldàliga

Article: Pere Casaldàliga (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): La Vanguardia (Rede Globo)
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Spanish-Brazilian prelate. Missionary to Brazil, where he developed an important and award-winning social work and defense of human rights, especially of indigenous people. Nicknamed "The Bishop of the Poors". Exponent of the liberation theology. Working on updating his article. Alsoriano97 (talk) 16:03, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) 2020 Belarusian protests

Article: 2020 Belarusian protests (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The largest protests since 1995 erupt in Belarus in the run-up to the 2020 presidential elections, which are met with an increasing crackdown by the Lukashenko regime. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ In Belarus, large-scale opposition protests, which erupted in the run-up to the 2020 presidential elections, continue after state-controlled media outlets report a landslide victory for incumbent Alexander Lukashenko.
Alternative blurb II: ​ Incumbent President of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko (pictured) claims victory in a presidential election considered not free or fair by election observers amid pro-democracy protests.
Alternative blurb III: ​ Belarus cracks down on pro-democracy protests as incumbent President of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko (pictured) claims victory in a presidential election considered not free or fair by election observers.
News source(s): BBC, Euronews, BBC (post-election)
Credits:

Large scale significant protests in Belarus, ongoing for some time, gaining significant momentum and coverage in recent days.Abcmaxx (talk) 13:18, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good to know your opinion. – Sca (talk) 13:58, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Just drew 60,000, without incident. Big by Belarus standards, maybe. The election will be bigger. InedibleHulk (talk) 19:42, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • @InedibleHulk Not without incident; given hundreds have been arrested, more threatened, and most of the opposition leaders and activists have been detained in some form or another, that is hardly an accurate statement. Belarus is a secretive police state, so 60000 open protesters is huge by any comparable standard. Abcmaxx (talk) 20:39, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Arrests are normal in police states. Lacks newsworthy incidents. Violence, property crime, clashes like elsewhere; this is a sidebar to an election story. But yeah, good to see a whole 3% of Minsk in the streets. Maybe after tomorrow, a full twentieth will get angry. InedibleHulk (talk) 20:47, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 7

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Science and technology
  • Reddit reports it was hit by a major hack, in which hackers took control of at least 70 of the most-popular subreddits and their respective moderator accounts to spam pro-Trump messages. A site spokesperson said an investigation is underway. (Wired) (CNet)

(Posted) RD: Adin Steinsaltz

Article: Adin Steinsaltz (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [25]
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Prolific scholar and groundbreaking translator of the Talmud. Sir Joseph (talk) 18:09, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) Air India Express Flight 1344

Proposed image
Article: Air India Express Flight 1344 (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ An Air India Express Boeing 737 aircraft (pictured) with 191 people on board crashes at an airport in the southern state of Kerala, India, killing at least seventeen people. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ An Air India Express plane with 191 people on board overruns a runway at an airport in the southern state of Kerala, India, killing at least seventeen people.
News source(s): BBC, AP, Reuters
Credits:

Article needs updating

Nominator's comments: Developing. Sherenk1 (talk) 16:15, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) 2020 Sri Lankan parliamentary election

Article: 2020 Sri Lankan parliamentary election (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Incumbent party Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna led by Gotabaya Rajapaksa claims a landslide victory in the parliamentary election. (Post)
News source(s): BBC, CNN, Al Jazeera
Credits:

Article updated
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: Sri Lanka was the only country in the world without a functioning parliament for months amid COVID-19 pandemic and this is an importamt election to determine the stability of the ruling government. It is also important as Sri Lanka is the only South Asian country to have held election in the middle of a pandemic. Abishe (talk) 02:07, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment This is ITN/R, so I have edited the nom to reflect that. The results section needs a prose update and the results should also be included in the infobox and lede, which incidentally is overly long and some of its material should be moved to the body. Bzweebl (talkcontribs) 02:26, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Just to clarify, the above was intended as an oppose on quality with the hope that the editors currently working on the article will fix the deficiencies I described, but I didn't think it would be necessary to make that explicit because I assumed succeeding !voters would agree that the article needs improvement. Bzweebl (talkcontribs) 03:44, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 6

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Science and technology

(Posted) RD: Frances E. Allen

Article: Frances E. Allen (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NYTimes, WAPost
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: First woman to win Turing award, key comp.sci. figure in the basics of compilers for computers. Died on the 4th but the earliest I can find notice of her death is this date (local paper , local obit), the bigger reports after this. Few small CNs that I will fix up after this. Masem (t) 19:46, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Wayne Fontana

Article: Wayne Fontana (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Guardian, BBC, The Daily Telegraph, Standard
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: British singer best known for "Game of Love." P-K3 (talk) 17:56, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Brent Scowcroft

Article: Brent Scowcroft (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NBC NYT
Credits:
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Article has been updated recently but now has multiple cn tags —valereee (talk) 17:39, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) Ram Mandir, Ayodhya

Proposed image
Article: Ram Mandir, Ayodhya (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Ram Temple construction officially starts after Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi performs the ground-breaking ceremony (pictured). (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ After it was first proposed in the 1980s, construction of the controversial Ram Mandir, Ayodhya temple begins in India, attended by Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
Alternative blurb II: Ram Temple construction officially starts after Prime Minister Narendra Modi lays the foundation stone.
Alternative blurb III: ​ In India, construction of the Ram Temple on disputed land officially begins with Prime Minister Narendra Modi laying the cornerstone.
Alternative blurb IV: ​ *Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi begins the groundwork of the Lord Ram temple at the disputed site which was the former location of the demolished Babri Masjid.
News source(s): (ALT Blurb II sources: CNN, Hindustan Times)
Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: Adding background/context, as requested in the comment section below: The temple construction started on 5 August 2020 in Ayodhya. It was followed by decades of legal and other battles. This is a very major and significant event in India and in the subcontinent. Time (magazine) has explained in an article why it matters. Deccan Herald prepared a note with 10 key facts. To know more about how it unfolded over the years, kindly read this The Times of India article.
Please feel free to suggest alternative blurbs. Titodutta (talk) 03:16, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support in principle. From the links provided above, this is receiving international attention as a prominent and controversial religious matter that has spanned at least the last 30 years just about this temple, let alone the site it's on. Modi's attendance adds to the story. I haven't judged the article, yet, so this !vote could change if it's in poor condition. Kingsif (talk) 05:59, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • leaning Oppose - we did already post this story, when the supreme Court made the decision to allow the temple last November. [26] [27] So in effect this is just another development in the same story, much like the spacecraft returning to earth after earlier launching. Unless I'm missing something?  — Amakuru (talk) 07:09, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • leaning Support with a better blurb. Has shown up on ITN within the last year, but the Ayodhya dispute is an 80+ year saga that's had enormous ramifications on Indian society and politics. Its generally credited with kick-starting the now-dominant Bharatiya Janata Party for one thing. Given the length of time between events it doesn't seem unreasonable to mention again. --RaiderAspect (talk) 08:36, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Major event in one of the greatest controversies in Indian history and society. I recommend linking to Ayodhya dispute in the blurb to provide context for unfamiliar readers. This is at least equally significant to the court decision we posted last year. Bzweebl (talkcontribs) 09:25, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, per Bzweebl. A better blurb is needed, however.—Brigade Piron (talk) 10:02, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support and added another blurb. – John M Wolfson (talkcontribs) 10:47, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Alt III. The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 10:47, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose This seems similar to the Hagia Sophia story which wasn't posted. If this has already been posted once then giving it more exposure again so soon seems premature. The ceremony in this case seems mainly to have been a photo-op for Modi and doesn't seem to be getting much attention outside India. Better to wait until the temple is completed and officially opened when there will be an actual building to report. Andrew🐉(talk) 11:47, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Andrew Davidson "Because x didn't get it, y shouldn't too" has been established to be an INVALID arguement. If you are going to oppose this, you're going to have to look at it on its own. Dantheanimator (talk) 15:22, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per Amakuru this was posted last fall. The "ground breaking" is ceremonial. Nominate again when it's complete. --LaserLegs (talk) 12:12, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - As per above supports. Sherenk1 (talk) 12:20, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. The article states that construction has been underway for four months, so this ceremony does seem like a photo op rather than a substantial step. That doesn't seem major enough to post the same story twice. Furthermore, if the dispute over this temple has had widespread impacts, it really isn't obvious from the article. Modest Genius talk 12:25, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Article looks ok. I'm not a Hindu but this seems to have some importance in the faith so in that way it is significant. (Hinduism is 1 of the 5 major religions of the world). Dantheanimator (talk) 15:19, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose on quality. Neither the article nor any of the blurbs succeed in explaining the event's significance. Alt0 and Alt2 don't even pretend to. —Cryptic 15:23, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - with Altblurb 4 that explains the events broader context. It is getting global coverage outside of India. The date chosen seem to have been the anniversary of the revocation of autonomy of Jammu and Kashmir, but that could be a coincidence.Albertaont (talk) 15:37, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment This is ready to be posted. Dantheanimator (talk) 18:15, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posted Went with Alt 3, which IMHO explain significance best. --Jayron32 18:42, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Post-posting comment For those questioning the significance of this, my understanding from past reading on the dispute is that this is THE most important symbolic flashpoint of Hindu-Muslim tensions in India. The section in the bolded article on the ground-breaking ceremony should give a sense on how big a deal it was in the context of the overall controversy. The ceremony was broadcast and celebrated by Hindus all over the world. Bzweebl (talkcontribs) 19:09, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Post-posting feedback on blurb: Is it right to say "disputed", once the Supreme court gave its final verdict on this matter in November of 2019? My thinking is that prior to this time, it would be alright to say "disputed", but, post the supreme court verdict, we should not be using the phrase "disputed". Also, in perhaps a minor point, we might want to reconsider starting with "In India". This brings up the systemic geographic bias that was being discussed yesterday, and gives the impression that the center of our universe is somewhere in the western world. E.g. we didn't start the post about the Spanish king by saying, "In Spain, ...". I know getting consensus on a blurb is a challenging one, but, AltBlurb2 remains the most neutral. Cheers. Ktin (talk) 19:23, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • As the person who (mainly) wrote the blurb on the page, a) the Supreme Court case did not change that this is still the flashpoint of strained Hindu-Muslim relations, and b) we said that Juan Carlos was the "King of Spain" in the blurb, thereby providing geographical context, and given that most people in the Western world (this is the English Wikipedia, after all) are not privy to this dispute, adding "In India" is a brief yet effective way to provide needed geographic context. – John M Wolfson (talkcontribs) 19:28, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • Regarding a), I have added my notes below to Jayron32's comment. Regarding b), sure, please do what is best. I agree with you that whatever conveys the message in a succinct manner and with brevity, should be done. But, on a minor point, we should just be aware of our biases when we say "in the Western World (this is the English Wikipedia, after all)" -- ~87% of the Wikipedia traffic from India is to the English Wikipedia (source). So, the western world can not be the only preserve of the English Wikipedia, or vice versa. But, to give you the benefit of doubt, only ~10% of all Wikipedia traffic comes from India. So, maybe that is driving your thinking. Cool either ways. Cheers. Ktin (talk) 20:04, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Per John M Wolfson, the dispute exists whether or not any legal conclusion was reached. The end of the dispute happens when there is no longer a significant dispute from opposition groups. The groups who were opposed to the temple construction still do, and the dispute is itself what makes this a major news event. Places of worship are under construction all over the world all the time, what makes this one newsworthy is that this one has been the source of tension in one of the world's largest nations. --Jayron32 19:31, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • Will let you guys decide the appropriate wording. You might know this better than me. But, "disputed" seems wrong, particularly when the it took the courts 28 years to end the dispute by providing a resolution. Now, will some parties to the dispute be aggrieved at the end of a verdict, perhaps yes, but, the whole reason a verdict was announced was to close a dispute, so to speak. Re: the second point, sure, please do what is best. Cheers.Ktin (talk) 19:37, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
        • I'm not particularly tied to one word in particular, if you have a word that better encapsulates the controversy without using "dispute", I'm open to changing it. I'm just not smart enough to think of one myself. --Jayron32 19:51, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
        • Also, I read this once more - the blurb clearly says building "on disputed land", I don't think the law would allow you to build on disputed land. If somoene were to do that, they would be breaking the law, and we don't want to be implying that the folks who are building are breaking the law. Cheers.Ktin (talk) 19:52, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
          • Jayron32, I must admit, I am in the same boat as well. Hence my thinking was that using Altblurb2 was the most neutral way to go about this one. Maybe pop in 'Indian' in between to give the geographical context. Thanks. Ktin (talk) 20:25, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
          • Ktin, in the context of the sentence, it can be reasonably inferred that by "dispute" it means "controversial". Also, consider the fact that "disputed land" is linked to the article, so any reader such as you can just click/hover over the link to learn more about the "dispute". You're interpreting "dispute" to politically, this is more of a socio-cultural thing from what I know (similar to the situation of East Jerusalem). If you want more clarification, just send me a ping and I'll be glad to make this clear for you. Dantheanimator (talk) 20:21, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
          • (edit conflict) Ktin, you just openly accused people of being racists here. You probably don't want to do that if you really are trying to convince people to help you out. Furthermore, I asked you for some help in crafting better wording. Your response was 1) to delete my request for help and 2) to go back to an earlier post of yours and edit it to accuse anyone who doesn't do exactly what you want to be a racist. Good luck with that. I'm done trying to be helpful to you. You can find someone else to do your bidding. --Jayron32 20:24, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
            • @Jayron32: Please let me admit that I am not accusing anyone of anything. There was a genuine edit conflict. Let me be the first one to apologize, if I gave anyone the impression that I was casting aspersions on them. Specifically, John M Wolfson, please accept my apologies, if that was what came out. I will stand down. Thanks everyone. Have a nice day. Ktin (talk) 20:30, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 5

Arts and culture

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Science and technology

Sports

(Posted) RD: Horace Clarke

Article: Horace Clarke (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The New York Times; New York Post; New York Daily News
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Bloom6132 (talk) 13:17, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Hawa Abdi

Article: Hawa Abdi (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The New York Times
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Bloom6132 (talk) 15:13, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Pete Hamill

Article: Pete Hamill (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Associated Press; The New York Times
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Bloom6132 (talk) 11:24, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Hurricane Isaias

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Hurricane Isaias (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Hurricane Isaias brings causes significant damage along the East Coast of the United States, spawning at least 10 tornadoes in an outbreak and killing 13+. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ Hurricane Isaias makes landfall in North Carolina and causes significant damage in much of the eastern United States.
News source(s): [29]
Credits:

Article updated
 ~ Destroyeraa (talk
@Ktin: Damage repairs and estimates are still ongoing. For second question: ni, only if it is notable and causes significant damage/kills people.~ Destroyeraa (talk|Contribs) 20:17, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The hurricane itself is done. InedibleHulk (talk) 20:23, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Got it. Thanks folks @InedibleHulk: and @Destroyeraa:. Hope everyone in the NE is safe. Ktin (talk) 20:39, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Which one is the deadliest storm of this season? We should definitely post that one :) Ktin (talk) 20:31, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Cristobal. Not even sure it got nominated. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 20:32, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Got it. Seems like we missed it. We should not miss this one. Ktin (talk) 20:39, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It was missed because it was non-notable, just like this. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 20:45, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Very Interesting. Is there a numerical threshold to being 'notable'? Ktin (talk) 20:51, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Well history tells us that around 30 to 40 deaths is the usual threshold for such storms to be considered worthwhile posting (I've only gone back as far as 2015 mind you). Setting the bar this low on a hurricane season would literally open the door to monthly postings of regular weather patterns in the US which fade away almost immediately. Perhaps we could add a new line to ITN during hurricane season in the US alone to publish all the various storms there for our audience. In the meantime, floods in India and China with far more impact on much less-developed countries are routinely dismissed as "standard weather for this time of year". Double standards anyone? The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 20:56, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
2020 Pacific typhoon season has caused 6 fatalities all year. China hasn't been hard hit by typhoons recently, there only having 1 fatality from that country in 2020.
2020 China floods were posted to ongoing last month for 11 days with no opposition.
2020 Assam floods weren't posted because the article wasn't updated enough. (It still is!) Only IndelibleInk opposed based on importance grounds. Howard the Duck (talk) 21:07, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, and that's just this year. How many over the last five years ridiculed and objected to through systemic bias? Yet people support this trivial storm, the like of which happens several times per year in one isolated part of the world? Amazing. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 21:09, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Howard. This is good to know. So, seems like with all of this, we should go ahead with posting this one. Let's move forward. Also, at the risk of stating the obvious, I do not think we should trivialize the less developed countries and their suffering as "standard time of the year". I am onboard that we should be posting those in a timely manner. Ktin (talk) 21:37, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yep. Typhoon Jebi (2018) killed 17 surely non-Caucasians and was posted. Good work, Wikipedia! Howard the Duck (talk) 21:16, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That is outstanding research. Meantime in 2019 there were something like eight notable floods in India alone with death tolls in excess of 50, none of which were posted, most of which weren't nominated. Let's just run a US weather ticker under the Covid banner, that's much easier than all this silly debate. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 21:19, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Without wishing to get into the debate above about deaths, as not every significant tropical cyclone causes a significant amount of deaths. We are currently trying to examine the way forward with meteorology articles at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Meteorology and User talk:Jason Rees/Flood articles. Comments are welcome while suggestions are vital.Jason Rees (talk) 21:33, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with Ktin. Cristobal didnt get posted bc we didnt know it caused 15 deaths till laye July! Always thought it caused only 5. ~ Destroyeraa (talk|Contribs) 20:54, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Technically, the United States are 51 sovereign states, hence the name. And only seven people have died in mass shootings this month, from just six counties (encapsulating Mulholland Drive). There was one in a federal district, most recently, everyone lived. InedibleHulk (talk) 21:29, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly! 7 is 6 less than 13. The Rambling Man, you can keep Rambling about how it's not notable and that 13 deaths are nothing. This is notable. ~ Destroyeraa (talk|Contribs) 22:25, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I don't follow you at all, but please stop trying to canvass votes. The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 22:26, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
And sure, mass shootings in August in the US amount to seven dead, but it's only 4 August. More than 60 in July. The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 22:29, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
(I clarified here, but it was destroyed, now TRM's pissed, so forget it. InedibleHulk (talk) 23:39, 5 August 2020 (UTC))[reply]
Um, if you mean "upset" then no, I'm just saying people killed in mass shootings in August (it's the 4th) nearly equates to the death toll here. And if you meant "drunk" then also no. I don't think your comment is very helpful at all and I'd urge you to strike it/explain it/apologise for a borderline NPA. Cheers. The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 23:44, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If it weren't going on after a whole lot of buildings (and people) were blown right away in Beirut, it'd be impressive; timing matters in the news. InedibleHulk (talk) 21:24, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. While 13 deaths and loss of property etc is certainly tragic, it seems like that is not at the level which it would make sense to post, bearing in mind the frequency of expected events at that level. As an aside, re "Setting the bar this low on a hurricane season would literally open the door to monthly postings", I'm curious where this door is, which will be literally opened if we're not careful? Might be worth putting anotbet padlock on it.  — Amakuru (talk) 22:05, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you don't mind my asking. What is that 'level' where it would make sense to post? Re: your latter question, I am tagging The Rambling Man to give you the location of that door. Ktin (talk) 22:15, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Standard door, it's got "systemic bias" just above the knocker. Cheers Ktin! The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 22:18, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
oh, that door. I know it well, and I've seen many people going through it in the past. It has a big red warning sign on it but is still left wide open for all to pass through.  — Amakuru (talk) 22:33, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I think on this one, I am on the same page as you The Rambling Man. However, the way to fix it is not to oppose everything else, but, instead when we see systemic bias denying an action for a under-represented region, we should speak up. Cheers. Ktin (talk) 22:43, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just close this discussion bc the consensus is clearly against me. ~ Destroyeraa (talk|Contribs) 22:52, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was running against the wind. InedibleHulk (talk) 23:01, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Seems like we are trending toward yet another "Unable to reach consensus" closure. This is not bad in and of itself. Speaks to the vibrancy of our debates. But, sometimes we should remind ourselves that this is "In the news" and not "In the olds" and show some bias to action. After all this section is not a "This day in history!". Cheers folks. Ktin (talk) 22:55, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Nice thought, but given this has been nominated twice, it's been tortuous and unnecessary. Probably worth knowing when a dead duck is a dead duck. The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 22:57, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose I don't see this in any news outside of the US. Doesn't seem like a very deadly or notable storm. Albertaont (talk) 23:14, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Not even close to the biggest story in the US. 160,000 dead from COVID now, is it? Black Kite (talk) 23:23, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose This actually ended up being less of a story than I was expecting, which I suppose is probably for the better. Pie3141527182 (talk) 00:37, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose The impact of the storm in the Caribbean was mild enough to not post then, and in the US and Canada... a few COVID-19 testing centers closed (something which couldn't happen at any other time). Basically, it rained heavily for half a day in a few states. Suggest close based on the strong opposes above and the fact it's not a story, it's a minor weather pattern. Storms just exist, only their effects really give notability over other wind, and this had none. Kingsif (talk) 00:52, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

References

Nominators often include links to external websites and other references in discussions on this page. It is usually best to provide such links using the inline URL syntax [http://example.com] rather than using <ref></ref> tags, because that keeps all the relevant information in the same place as the nomination without having to jump to this section, and facilitates the archiving process.

For the times when <ref></ref> tags are being used, here are their contents: