Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Puerto Rico: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
Tags: Manual revert Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 51: Line 51:


:That's great! Thank you for sharing this. [[User:Yarfpr|Yarfpr]] ([[User talk:Yarfpr|talk]]) 02:24, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
:That's great! Thank you for sharing this. [[User:Yarfpr|Yarfpr]] ([[User talk:Yarfpr|talk]]) 02:24, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
:@melba [[Special:Contributions/35.146.78.123|35.146.78.123]] ([[User talk:35.146.78.123|talk]]) 15:44, 2 May 2023 (UTC)


==How to subcategorize Puerto Rico articles==
==How to subcategorize Puerto Rico articles==

Revision as of 22:21, 2 May 2023

Dr Morales Carrión and his role during the Cuban Missile Crisis

Article fails to mention Dr AMC’s role during the Cuban Missile Crisis, perhaps his greatest diplomatic achievement. AEMAC1949 (talk) 20:21, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Fuerzas Armadas de Liberación Nacional Puertorriqueña has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 00:02, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Project-independent quality assessments

Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.

No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.

However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 20:59, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good to me. Mercy11 (talk) 18:19, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That's great! Thank you for sharing this. Yarfpr (talk) 02:24, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How to subcategorize Puerto Rico articles

I have been working on standardizing the subcategories under which Puerto Rico-related articles appear. There was a mix of ways under which Puerto Rico articles were being subcategorized, yet the natural thing to do seemed to be to have a one common systematic way of subcategorizing them. For example, in categories about museums, the subcategory “Category:Museums in Puerto Rico” could had been subcategorized under (1) Category:Museums in insular areas of the United States, (2) Category:Museums in the United States by location, or (3) Category:Museums in the United States by dependent territory, (and perhaps a few others). I chose the first format (“XYZ in insular areas of the United States”). It seemed natural: most subcategories of Puerto Rico articles already appeared to be using that format. What do you all think? Mercy11 (talk) 01:14, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since Puerto Rico is an unincorporated territory of the United States, I agree with the use of the insular area category since it is a fairly common term in the United States to refer to its dependent territories. Yarfpr (talk) 01:30, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It was time someone did this. Thanks Mercy11. "Category:... in insular areas of the United States" is a good bucket and it fills up with other US insular areas, as well. i.e. USVI, and the other less populated ones - the ones no one seems to speak of hardly. Let me know if you need help with this project and I could try to make some time but I've just been so busy with life. Thanks again. --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 15:04, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]