Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Croatia: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 16:02, 13 July 2017

This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Croatia and anything related to its purposes and tasks.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Shortcuts

Template:Outline of knowledge coverage WPT

Croatia Project‑class

	Croatia portal This page is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
Project	This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/WikiProject used

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Upcoming "420 collaboration"

You are invited to participate in the upcoming

"420 collaboration",

which is being held from Saturday, April 15 to Sunday, April 30, and especially on April 20, 2017!

The purpose of the collaboration, which is being organized by WikiProject Cannabis, is to create and improve cannabis-related content at Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects in a variety of fields, including: culture, health, hemp, history, medicine, politics, and religion.

WikiProject Croatia participants may be particularly interested in the following: Cannabis in Croatia.

For more information about this campaign, and to learn how you can help improve Wikipedia, please visit the "420 collaboration" page.

---Another Believer _(Talk) 21:45, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Free Territory of Trieste

Hi guys, over the past few weeks the article Free Territory of Trieste has been edited to contend that it was never dissolved, and still exists as a sovereign state. This seems to me to be manifestly wrong and a fringe theory (see for example this website), and I don't think the cited sources support this contention at all. Similar content seems to have been previously inserted into the article years ago and subsequently removed, as documented on the article's talk page. I have no expertise on the matter, so thought I would alert potentially interested parties. Portwalrus (talk) 15:57, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Talk:History of Istria#NPOV problems

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:History of Istria#NPOV problems. 72.201.104.140 (talk) 00:05, 1 May 2017 (UTC)Template:Z48[reply]

Popular pages report

We – Community Tech – are happy to announce that the Popular pages bot is back up-and-running (after a one year hiatus)! You're receiving this message because your WikiProject or task force is signed up to receive the popular pages report. Every month, Community Tech bot will post at Wikipedia:WikiProject Croatia/Popular pages with a list of the most-viewed pages over the previous month that are within the scope of WikiProject Croatia.

We've made some enhancements to the original report. Here's what's new:

The pageview data includes both desktop and mobile data.
The report will include a link to the pageviews tool for each article, to dig deeper into any surprises or anomalies.
The report will include the total pageviews for the entire project (including redirects).

We're grateful to Mr.Z-man for his original Mr.Z-bot, and we wish his bot a happy robot retirement. Just as before, we hope the popular pages reports will aid you in understanding the reach of WikiProject Croatia, and what articles may be deserving of more attention. If you have any questions or concerns please contact us at m:User talk:Community Tech bot.

Warm regards, the Community Tech Team 17:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Ante Jelić

Hi, I wonder if a member of this project can help evaluate notability of this subject? K.e.coffman (talk) 05:25, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at both the article in question and its Croatian-language counterpart, I don't see the case for notability w.r.t. WP:GNG or otherwise. If it were nominated for deletion, I'd say "delete". GregorB (talk) 16:01, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 05:25, 12 July 2017 edit K.e.coffman (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 98,319 edits →‎Ante Jelić: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:02, 13 July 2017 edit undo GregorB (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers 185,113 edits →‎Ante Jelić: r Next edit →
Line 61:		Line 61:

	Hi, I wonder if a member of this project can help evaluate notability of this subject? [[User:K.e.coffman\|K.e.coffman]] ([[User talk:K.e.coffman\|talk]]) 05:25, 12 July 2017 (UTC)		Hi, I wonder if a member of this project can help evaluate notability of this subject? [[User:K.e.coffman\|K.e.coffman]] ([[User talk:K.e.coffman\|talk]]) 05:25, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
			: Looking at both the article in question and its [[hr:Ante Jelić\|Croatian-language counterpart]], I don't see the case for notability w.r.t. WP:GNG or otherwise. If it were nominated for deletion, I'd say "delete". [[User:GregorB\|GregorB]] ([[User talk:GregorB\|talk]]) 16:01, 13 July 2017 (UTC)